You mean peer review like the IPCC does. Sends out a brief to scientists for a response on their theories and then includes every person on their mailing list as co authors or people in agreement with their theories. This is just plain deceiptful and shows truly evil intent.
You're showing how little you understand the peer-reviewed process. Any decent physics lab on the planet can show how CO2 traps heat. It's an established fact, like the boiling point of water. Do you deny this?
Or maybe peer reviews where scientists are not even allwed to analyse the models and study the data but must simply nod in agreement.
You need to go buy some Prozac and calm down a little.
And in the same way desert weather is being dumped on other areas. Lets at least have some consistency in your views even if they are bizarre.
No, the worldwide heating is NOT just desert heat blowing across the ENTIRE PLANET making it warmer. Warming shows up at night and in winter, so it's not the sun either. It's the atmosphere, and the increase of methane and CO2 in the atmosphere, that is doing it.
Are you absolutely serious??? Its takes half a brain to recognize this scam. And why should a group a wicked people be allowed to set up a system which they can manipulate and manage to extract huge profit for themselves. Markets do not have their own life, they are manipulated and managed by those that have the power through their collarboration and their vast resources. And this is true of all commodities and currencies .Seriously I can only imagine you are in on this scam before you are frankly acting too naive to be anything else.
China and India are building 400 coal fired power stations so they obviosuly know something about carbon reserves that you and the IPCC dont. Let the market really decide without this wicked plan of self enrichment. Long before carbon energy runs out, entrepreneurs would have devised ways to create more carbon fuel or other technologies would have replaced them. Thats how a free market functions.
1. I did not say coal would run out in our generation, but it may peak and become more expensive within the next few decades. See peak coal.
2. Global warming increases
national security risks as identified by the Pentagon.
However, In a stunning rebuke to climate change nay-sayers who routinely malign the United Nations and, most especially, its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (
IPCC), the ICA cites several U.N. studies and especially relies on the IPCC's 2007 Assessment Report for dire predictions on the impact of climate change on water resources globally. In typically understated, cool and detached bureaucratese -- even when predicting potentially horrendous global implications -- the ICA
concluded that "climate change will cause water shortages in many areas of the world" (including the western U.S.) that will "suffer a decrease in water resources due to climate change" and that, if left unaddressed, "water challenges worldwide will pose a threat to U.S. security interests."
Just as right wingers insist a government funded military is a good thing, they should also be consistent and insist that the government analyse and respond to other issues that might damage the viability of their nation.
Also, coal particles kill tens of thousands of Americans every year, pollutes cities, coal mining destroys landscapes, and it can all be replaced with an American owned, home-grown mix of renewables, nuclear energy, and TODs. (Transition Oriented Developments / Aka New Urbanism).
Yeah well they didnt make wild assumptions about what happens to those CO2 traps. The IPCC onclusions that are quite frankly presumtuous and incorrect and do not even match reality.
Incorrect, and again, just flaunted as your opinion.
You are a laugh a minute.... Anti science? I just have to read the IPCC evidence and your links to get a load full of anti science disinformation.
Incorrect, and again, just flaunted as your opinion.
The bible speaks of unjust scales in the end times. Look no further than this massive scam of deceipt and deception for confirmation of the times.....
1. I'm amil. Revelation doesn't PREDICT any specific end-times table that anyone can interpret. It roughly describes the general condition of the period from Jesus Ascension to Jesus Return. It's descriptive, and applies to all Christians across all time. It's written to John's generation describing the tribulation that HE shared with his brothers in that first Christian generation! It's theology, not timetables. It's encouraging, not some scary end-times thriller. It's generic. It's the gospel dressed up in fancy imagery.
2. If it WERE a time-table ordained by God (and it isn't a timetable, just look at all the mutually contradictory and entirely silly 'predictions' in these forums!, all based on Revelation), then your fight against the 'unfair' carbon tax is a fight against God himself. He's ordained it. So put up with it! It's all good, because you don't have to worry about anything. It's all in your 'timetable' of Revelation. You know it is going to happen, so don't worry! You know what happens next, so don't worry.
3. In fact, why not just
join me! in getting a worldwide carbon tax implemented to hurry along whatever timetable schema you imagine you see in the book of Revelation?
4. But a carbon tax that helped fund clean energy research and the actual building out of nuclear-waste-eating GenIV reactors like the Integral Fast Reactor would actually be a very fair, very compassionate, very
Christian thing to do. It would ensure a viable climate for our children and grandchildren, and help increase national security at the same time.
Be a man for once, and admit you just didn't know about this group being funded by big coal because you only watch Fox News for your world-view shaping daily misinformation digest.
