Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Possibly - if the preachers/teachers don't believe in prayer, study or inspiration of the Holy Spirit, or have God's Spirit living in them.There is a fair chance it could possibly tell us more about God than preachers and teachers do.
So you take one phrase of mine out of context and then ask a computer what it means, rather than asking me?webnoted:
"God and Our Actions
The quote “I don’t think God minds too much what we do” suggests a perspective that God is not overly concerned with the specifics of human behavior or actions.
That is exactly what happened.Nope. Non sequitur.
Nope.webnoted:
"God and Our Actions
The quote “I don’t think God minds too much what we do” suggests a perspective that God is not overly concerned with the specifics of human behavior or actions.
Nope.
- Relaxation of moral expectations: This quote implies that God may not be as strict or particular about human behavior as traditional religious teachings might suggest. It may be seen as a more lenient or permissive view of God’s nature.
I wasn't talking about that, though Jesus himself said that bad/evil words come out of our mouths and reflect what's in our hearts. He also said that a good tree cannot bear bad fruit.
- Focus on inner transformation: Instead of focusing on external actions, this perspective might emphasize the importance of inner transformation, such as a person’s thoughts, feelings, and motivations. According to this view, God is more concerned with the heart and intentions behind our actions rather than the actions themselves.
It's essential to note that I was talking ONLY about a Christian saying, "is it God's will for me to get this job/study at this college, go to this church?" etc etc. Within that context; I don't believe God minds whether we choose to be a nurse or a teacher. WHAT we do - have a specific career, get married etc - is, I believe, not as important to God as the kind of people that we are.It’s essential to note that this perspective may not align with traditional Christian teachings, which often emphasize the importance of obedience to God’s commands and the moral implications of human actions.
Understood. Your comment about who we are is covered by the second commandment, that we focus on the needs of others rather than our selfishness. If that is who we are then all else follows accordingly and we end up like the example of the original Way. The best way to be His holy, thankful, prayerful children is to follow His will as commanded in that second commandment. The second is to follow Jesus' commandment that we spread this way of life, this counter-culture among the worldly oriented.That's the point I was making.
It certainly seemed to sum it all up rather nicely, condensing all the data available online. Are the denominations resentful of losing their identities to neutrality?You think a programmed computer tells us more about God than his holy word?
There is a fair chance it could possibly tell us more about God than preachers and teachers do.
Daniel 2:43-44 KJVI wonder at what point AI will seek its own will and the cycle continues when it becomes gods like us?
Daniel 2:43-44 KJV
And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay. [44] And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.
View attachment 360779
View attachment 360780
As a 20 year veteran I can assure you that soldiers who are killed by AI powered technology on the battlefield do not consider AI anything to do with marketing at all, nor do their comrades who remain think they have been killed by illusions.AI is a marketing illusion based in computer programming; the intelligence part is where the code makes decisions instead of a human brain, as though it were a human brain, which is similar to the definition of blaspheme.
GibberishAI is a marketing illusion based in computer programming; the intelligence part is where the code makes decisions instead of a human brain, as though it were a human brain, which is similar to the definition of blaspheme.
As a 20 year veteran I can assure you that soldiers who are killed by AI powered technology on the battlefield do not consider AI anything to do with marketing at all, nor do their comrades who remain think they have been killed by illusions.
For thousands of years dogs have been trained in warfare and when they are trained to make decisions in place of humans in the defence of their handlers or in killing the enemy it has nothing in common with the definition of blasphemy.
AI is not making decisions as though it is a human brain for it is simply a sequence of elaborate interlinked programming determining whether a switch is on or off in a binary system, from which computers have really not advanced significantly for decades."
AI does not think at all and even though it may do one day, currently it is almost as far from that capacity as a Texas instruments calculator from 40 years ago.
Admittedly, computers are so much more powerful than they used to be 50 years ago and we are a lot closer to generating machines that do think for themselves, but AI as we know it is far from that place.
The electrochemical transmissions between the synapses in the brain facilitating ideas and thoughts and memories and impulses and stimuli and sensations would not be possible without the cerebral mass, just as the AI code would be nothing without the hardware whose foundation is currently silicon.
Silicon has no conscience or intelligence or capacity regardless of whether it is powering AI software or computer code or machine code.
Machines cannot blaspheme God.
You are trying to connect dots that do not exist.
Yes, with the ability to make mistakes faster than we.Admittedly, computers are so much more powerful than they used to be 50 years ago
When TimothyU said he wondered where AI would go and how it would develop you might notice that I did not talk about or define the technology in any way at all because that is an irrelevance to the body of Christ.Your response confuses me, as I try to understand what AI means to you. There are two things relating to AI, there is the process and there is the application: there probably multiple processes each having multiple applications. AI or artificial intelligence is a misnomer, it is not arificial, nor is it intelligent; but tis depends on conext and on definitions.
As I hear AI spoken of, all I hear is rhetoric that seems to be derived from buzz word and buzz sentences generators. What you seem to indicate as AI, I probably would call something else, like automation.
Most things depend on definition, blaspheme is where a man considers himself equal to God, in place of God, as though he were God; not only would the machine need to be defined but also God.
As a future possibility could a machine blaspheme God, yes, could the anti-Christ be a machine, no.
When TimothyU said he wondered where AI would go and how it would develop you might notice that I did not talk about or define the technology in any way at all because that is an irrelevance to the body of Christ.
All I did was post a prophecy directly out of scripture that could be relevant to his consideration and the meanings of two words that occurred in, or were possibly relevant to the prophecy.
It is prophecy that edifies and you going off track and detracting from that prophecy was of no value in edifying anyone.
My response in large part was framed in order to try and gently persuade you that your response had descended into meaningless vanity.
You might also want to look at your definition of blasphemy because anyone who thinks that it is acceptable to claim that God can be defined is walking on dangerous ground.
If I might be honest, with all these things in mind, I can see why you are confused.
Well that certainly reveals how little you know the Bible.I take my meaning for blaspheme from the Bible; when Jesus said, before Abraham was, I AM, the Pharisees relied, blaspheme, I assume the Pharisees got that right as well as the Bible translators. I would never arive at this conclusion from my dictionary.
Isn't it interesting that today the golden rule, based on Jesus' second commandment and half the gospel we were to spread, is either outright denied or limited to one's own splintered divisive tribe, self-defining who gets to be their neighbour. They have effectively given away acting responsibly towards all to instead seeking personal rights. Immature adults and youth stuck in the high school clique mentality.Are you a disciple of Christ, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?