• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Get rid of 39 books of OT - or accept all as scripture - the Word of God for the saints?

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
15,596
8,227
50
The Wild West
✟763,279.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate

Really it seems to me your own denomination by omiting important books, included in the KJV, like Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus and Tobith, is among those that could be charged with omitting portions of the Old Testament, some of which were held as extremely important by the early church.

And of course, Flavius Josephus and his biased Pharisaical opinion of the OT canon will be brought up in defense of the Adventist denominations and perhaps certain other Protestant denominations, such as Calvinist Baptists, but Flavius Josephus was not a Father of the Early Church but one who rejected Christ, as far as we know, and he was also an unreliable historian. I don’t seek to mention this for your benefit but rather that people are aware of what the early church taught and what traditional Christians still teach. And one thing they did not teach was that there existed any kind of “intertestamental period.”

I would also criticize the Adventist denominations for at times prioritizing the OT and taking it out of context, ignoring the revelation of its prophetic nature at the end of Luke in favor of a legalistic literalist interpretation which clashes with important parts of the new Testament. Indeed the entire Lukan and Pauline corpus seems to be subject to an eisegetical hermeneutic among the various Adventist denominations.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,910
Georgia
✟1,094,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Really it seems to me your own denomination by omiting important books, included in the KJV, like Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus and Tobith,
I don't have those books in my KJV nor do other protestant denominations nor is it in the Hebrew Bible NOR can it be said that those books you reference were authored by Christians or that Christians were the custodians of those books as they were written.

So your "your own denomination" statements seems to be pointless. What am I missing?
I would also criticize the Adventist denominations for at times prioritizing the OT and taking it out of context, ignoring the revelation of its prophetic nature at the end of Luke
Looks like little more than t a false accusation on your part against a POV that you do not agree with. Not particularly compelling. I prefer "the details"/

in favor of a legalistic literalist interpretation which clashes with important parts of the new Testament.
Not true - but you have free will and can choose those pejoratives as it pleases you.
Indeed the entire Lukan and Pauline corpus seems to be subject to an eisegetical hermeneutic
Only if you insist on doing that. I recommend against it.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,366
11,910
Georgia
✟1,094,287.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
As instructions to Timothy to bring Paul his coat and some books are not specifically to you - AND YET cannot be construed to imply that this means the New Testament does not apply to a Christian today - it seems your argument above fails at that point.
 
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
13,831
5,604
European Union
✟236,159.00
Country
Czech Republic
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
If you say that the law given to Jews applies to Christians, because "All Scripture is inspired", its your logic that fails.

"All Scripture is inspired etc" is not an argument for the Jewish law being for us. It was given to a specific group of people and for a specific period, which is also said in the same Scripture.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0