Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
They leave evidence that we can see. (Also really not much missing from the branches linking humans to chimps and other apes).Yes, I know.
If you can't see it in your telescopes or microscopes, it doesn't exist.
Missing links though?
No problem.
Just gloss over them with a blue line.
Pluto is a dwarf planet, a planet is defined as a wandering star.They've already been named.
But you wouldn't understand.
But for those who would:
Psalm 147:4 He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names.
So name one, or admit that it's just another unsupported claim.They've already been named.
...
Psalm 147:4 He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by their names.
Am I in God's stead?So name one, or admit that it's just another unsupported claim.
Post 39 please.There is no edge or vertices.
Post 39 please.
That isn't a term used in geology and no one, ever, has suggested that every single layer observed in nature represents long periods. Ice core layers represent seasons and years, same with varves. The supposed "polystrate trees" aren't even found in differing deposits. They're just layers of the same material.Polystrate Trees
As expected, just another empty claim.Am I in God's stead?
God named them, I didn't.
Deuteronomy 29:29 The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.
Interesting word choice.As expected, just another empty claim.
The usual M.O. - pointless semantic distraction.Interesting word choice.
Luke 1:50 And his mercy is on them that fear him from generation to generation.
51 He hath shewed strength with his arm; he hath scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts.
52 He hath put down the mighty from their seats, and exalted them of low degree.
53 He hath filled the hungry with good things; and the rich he hath sent empty away.
Rich in information, but empty of understanding.
Revelation 3:17 Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:
Interesting word choice.The usual M.O. - pointless semantic distraction.
'Word salad' is more apposite.Interesting word choice.
Another poster here calls it "posting a wall of blue text".
We call it, "getting the Gospel out."
I'm sure that's what many see when they read the Bible.'Word salad' is more apposite.
You can go see polystrate fossils being formed in Cook Inlet Alaska.That isn't a term used in geology and no one, ever, has suggested that every single layer observed in nature represents long periods. Ice core layers represent seasons and years, same with varves. The supposed "polystrate trees" aren't even found in differing deposits. They're just layers of the same material.
Yep. There is a series in Dinosaur National Park that records 1.2 million years worth if I remember correctly. And they are corroborated by ocean floor varves and ice layers in Antarctica. There is no question that the Earth is older than the creation account claims. I read about that Japanese lake several years ago. Lake vares record all sorts of things including the plants that were present, droughts, dust storms, forest fires, meteor impacts, and volcanic eruptions. They used carbon dating to date the layers and it correlated exactly and this validates Carbon dating back long before the flood is supposed to have happened and yet there is no evidence of it in the varves. Anyone who believes in the creation and the flood does so in the face of incontrovertible evidence.Through an interest in rock collecting, I learned about the geology of varves. These are sediments such as were deposited where a river flows into a lake or the sea. In the summer the sediment is darker with carbon from plant blooms. In the winter the sediment is lighter as plants do not grow in cold winter temperatures. Geologists found records of tens of thousands of years of deposition of the varve sediments in river deltas.
This is one article. There may be others.
A 60,000 Year Varve Record from Japan Refutes the Young-Earth Interpretation of Earth’s History
Ha. All that's needed to crush all of that isYep. There is a series in Dinosaur National Park that records 1.2 million years worth if I remember correctly. And they are corroborated by ocean floor varves and ice layers in Antarctica. There is no question that the Earth is older than the creation account claims. I read about that Japanese lake several years ago. Lake vares record all sorts of things including the plants that were present, droughts, dust storms, forest fires, meteor impacts, and volcanic eruptions. They used carbon dating to date the layers and it correlated exactly and this validates Carbon dating back long before the flood is supposed to have happened and yet there is no evidence of it in the varves. Anyone who believes in the creation and the flood does so in the face of incontrovertible evidence.
Not without dropping reason and logic. But we already know that they do this. The arbitrary is inadmissible as evidence.Ha. All that's needed to crush all of that is
to say SEDI! ( Same Evidence Different Interpretation)
Okay.And why would they be mixed and matched?
Surely you don't expect to find mans' bones with dinosaur bones, do you?
If a man even got close to a T. Rex, he wouldn't be around to fossilize, would he?
Do you expect to find elephant bones in the cemetery closest to you?Nice.
What's your point?
There are no antediluvian bones on the earth, in my opinion.
Any bones we find came after the Flood.
All the ones before the Flood were removed from the earth for sanitary and safety reasons.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?