• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Geologic Proof of an old earth creation.

SavedByGrace3

Jesus is Lord of ALL! (Not asking permission)
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2002
20,561
4,339
Midlands
Visit site
✟725,796.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Looking at this cross section of a location in the Grand Canyon.
  1. What we are looking at first, at the bottom we see limestone, which is rock that is formed by the bodies of early life falling to the bottom of deep oceans.
  2. This rock is covered by other sedimentary layers.
  3. The surface raises above sea level. It is then covered by lava formations that were laid down on dry land by volcanic activity.
  4. Then, the volcanic rock was worn down and shows evidence of vegetation.
  5. Then the volcanic rock was covered over by more sedimentary layers.
  6. The next occurrence would be a crustal uplifting causing the layers to become diagonal.
  7. The diagonal rock was in the form of mountains which were then eroded away leveling the formation.
  8. Then more sedimentary rocks were laid down, some of which were limestone indicating the surface has again submerged below the ocean.
Many young earth creationists will state that all these formations occurred over a couple months during Noah's flood.

Here is the issue.
We see layers of sedimentary rock including limestone(life), followed by a dry-land layer of lava, followed by erosion and vegetation, followed by more sedimentary layers, followed by crustal upheaval forming diagonal layers, followed by the erosion of those layers down flat, followed by more sedimentary layers (including limestone, again life beneath an ocean), and finally back to the current dry earth of southwest USA. There is simply no way that this history could be formed during a 120-day flood. We can only conclude that all of these formations were made over a very long period of time, long before Adam and Eve were made in the Garden of Eden.

 
Last edited:

Irkle Berserkle

Active Member
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2021
210
224
Arizona
✟16,236.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Sure, but does your explanation factor in that the Earth is actually flat?

I live close to the Grand Canyon and visit several times a year. I think it pretty well speaks for itself that the earth is extremely old. I have a soft spot for Young Earth Creationists, but their "science" might be more accurately described as "desperation." Fortunately, salvation doesn't hinge on how old we believe the creation is.
 
Upvote 0

jesuslover811

Active Member
Dec 3, 2021
154
146
Nowhere
✟6,993.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Atheists act like evolution and earth formation is the end all be all for Christianity. Like I do not really care how God did it he could do anything he wants.
 
Reactions: SavedByGrace3
Upvote 0

Irkle Berserkle

Active Member
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2021
210
224
Arizona
✟16,236.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Atheists act like evolution and earth formation is the end all be all for Christianity. Like I do not really care how God did it he could do anything he wants.
That's why I'm always perplexed by Christians who are troubled by the biblical accounts of miracles and the Resurrection. If you believe God created everything, which is pretty much Christianity 101, why would you be troubled by miracles or the Resurrection or anything else?
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
29,835
8,383
Canada
✟856,016.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Back in biblical days, a 360 day calendar was used, today we use a 365 day calendar based on changes to the way things appear over a period of time.

If we're talking about billions of years, there's no way of knowing how long a day or a year was back then anyway.
 
Reactions: SavedByGrace3
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
10,902
8,957
64
Martinez
✟1,087,065.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Why is it so difficult to belive that Moses only recorded His lineage ? And those thereafter followed suit?
 
Upvote 0

SuperCow

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 14, 2018
650
302
58
Leonardtown, MD
✟278,025.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Why is it so difficult to belive that Moses only recorded His lineage ? And those thereafter followed suit?

Actually, the question should be: Ancient Sumerians, Egyptians, and Babylonians recorded their lineage, and we have examples in museums all over the world that other civilizations did so as well. Why would it be so difficult to believe that Moses, Abraham, and other patriarchs would do the same thing?
 
Reactions: Job 33:6
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
10,902
8,957
64
Martinez
✟1,087,065.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Except Moses starts from Adam and Eve. The rest ?
 
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
9,109
3,079
Hartford, Connecticut
✟347,743.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I think the key here is that as Christians, we ought to reclaim the science and proclaim the science in the name of the Lord.

Historically the church opposed the idea of heliocentrism. But the ultimate solution wasn't to burrow our heads and to reject heliocentrism, rather the solution was ultimately to come to terms with our developing understanding of the nature of the Lord and how He spoke to and through mankind.

Now we take heliocentrism for granted. We just say, oh yes, well of course God made it this way. And the glory goes to Him.

And concepts involving an old earth, really should be no different. And we must love on our fellow brothers and sisters in Christ, even those that are YECs. But at the same time, we ought to be aware that rejection of heliocentrism was never really destined to succeed.

Some YECs are essentially retaliating against science in response to the growth of mankind's understanding of creation. But God's train won't stop moving. So we either climb on board or get run over.
 
Upvote 0

SavedByGrace3

Jesus is Lord of ALL! (Not asking permission)
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2002
20,561
4,339
Midlands
Visit site
✟725,796.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
When I talk to flat earthers, I come away thinking that I am not really going to be able to relate with them. I respect them as people and wish them the best, but they come across as ignorant and stubborn. I do not mean that as insulting or I am not trying to be cruel or dismissive. I am just saying if I was going to hire a geologist to complete a million-dollar survey, I would certainly not hire them. And if I am having a similar discussion and they introduce that they are believers in the gospel, what am I supposed to think of their testimony? Please believe me, I am not being condescending toward them or dismissive of them as people. But there is a problem.
I know that faith is evidence of things not seen, i.e. the invisible God. I can say that and so can you because we are not claiming to base that belief on anything scientific. We admit that it is a faith. Nobody can really refute it.
But some believe that faith is the denial of things that are. For instance the subject at hand. There is simply no logical way that the earth can only be 6000 years old. There is no way that the geologic formations on the earth were all generated during the 120 days of the flood. There is no way the flood created all the fossil evidence. If the creation is only 6000 years old, then there is no way we can see stars that are further away than 6000 years. The rest of the universe would be invisible to us because the light from those stars has not reached us. We now see multitudes of galaxies and other celestial formations that we should not be able to see. These objects are billions of light-years away and we should not see their light yet. The only conclusion we can make is that the universe is very very old. But when people insist the universe is only 6000 years old, they come across very much like the flat-earth believers. I know they are well-intentioned and I am sure they love God. But if they deny reality and believe in leaps of illogic, then should I trust them to make life decisions about my faith and living? If they make no sense regarding things that are visible, how can we trust them regarding things that are invisible? It would be better if they just said nothing at all. I can trust the poster who said they just believe God created it all and do not need proof. I agree. I take it as a matter of faith and I do not deny the reality that we see around us. But those who make statements like "the universe is only 6000 years" old lose me because evidence and common sense refute this. If you deny reality... how can we trust your testimony?
So God and all the truth we know about Him and the spiritual is both logical and makes perfect sense. I totally refute the idea that God does not make sense and His creation is full of confusion and (apparently) lies. In the end, it is difficult to relate to people who do not make sense, and demand that you not make sense either.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

coffee4u

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2018
5,002
2,819
Australia
✟166,475.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

I think you mean "I can only conclude" Not we.

1 Corinthians 3:18-19
Let no one deceive himself. If anyone among you thinks that he is wise in this age, let him become a fool that he may become wise. For the wisdom of this world is folly with God. For it is written, “He catches the wise in their craftiness,”

I would rather have faith in scripture than faith in the knowledge of men. So while you go around basing what you believe about scripture from the knowledge that men spout; atheistic, humanist secular people at that, people who weren't there, I will continue to find truth in scripture from scripture.


Exodus 20
And God spoke all these words:
11 For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.

You do realize other experiment have shown that limestone can start forming after 400 days? Not that this is important either, but there are far more opinions and differing 'facts' than what you stated. You simply gathered the ones you happen to like that suit your world view.
 
Reactions: AdB
Upvote 0

SavedByGrace3

Jesus is Lord of ALL! (Not asking permission)
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2002
20,561
4,339
Midlands
Visit site
✟725,796.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Thanks for the input. I would rather hear information that pertains to the subject at hand. Feel free to include any information you like! I am not afraid of facts. None of us should be. God is not the author of confusion. So help us out with some facts about the OP.
Thanks!
 
Upvote 0

SuperCow

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 14, 2018
650
302
58
Leonardtown, MD
✟278,025.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Except Moses starts from Adam and Eve. The rest ?

They also start from Adam and Eve, or sometimes from Noah or Shem, Ham or Japheth, though they are in their own native languages, with native cultures and often with native nicknames. Those before the flood might have full names you do not recognize, but have been transliterated multiple times between the flood (complicated by Babel) and Moses.
 
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
9,109
3,079
Hartford, Connecticut
✟347,743.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

One thing I find interesting is that YECs oftentimes might suggest some alteration of the speed of light to explain how we can see objects in space. Like maybe light was millions of times faster in the past, then it slowed down.

And, of course there isn't any evidence for this response. But I like going a step further and looking at galaxies that have tails like the tadpole Galaxy. The tadpole Galaxy has basically left matter behind it and the galaxy itself has stretched and moved hundreds of thousands of light years in distance. And the galaxy itself, in order to have formed in 6,000 years, would have had to travel faster than the speed of light.

So the topic even goes beyond light traveling faster than the speed of light, but matter travelling faster than the speed of light too.
 
Reactions: SavedByGrace3
Upvote 0

Aussie Pete

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 14, 2019
9,082
8,298
Frankston
Visit site
✟773,725.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced
Get a clear container, part fill it with dirt, preferably a sandy soil that mixes readily with water. Stir well and leave to settle. It will form layers remarkably like the Grand Canyon. I've read research that suggests this happened during Noah's flood. The argument includes a statement that there is no significant vegetation between layers.

This technique was popular for a while with ornaments. They were usually flat glass with the sandy layers between two pieces. They looked interesting enough but it seems to be a fad that has passed.

We do not know what was under what is now the Grand Canyon. Perhaps the sedimentary layers are on top of existing rock. If you want a complete explanation, look up Dr Walt Brown. He has been researching this for decades. I've been to the Grand Canyon, but my geological skills are about zero. It's truly amazing, so I just enjoyed the wonder of it all.

Having said all that, I believe in the old earth, pre Adamic creation theory myself. No one can prove it one way or the other. It just makes much more sense to me than YE.
 
Reactions: SavedByGrace3
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
9,109
3,079
Hartford, Connecticut
✟347,743.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

One thing that the sand in a box with water experiment doesn't account for are striations, slickenlines and brecciated fault gouge between bedding planes of unconformities.

The above features demonstrate not rapid deposition of lose unconsolidated sediment, but rather dense structural uplift and motion of consolidated rock, then proceeded by further deposition.

For example, if sediment was deposited rapidly by water, then how or why would fault gouge or striations or slickenlines exist between layers of unconformities?

Like if someone takes a brick, and grinds that brick against the sidewalk, it would leave a linear scrape or gouge or striations in the sidewalk. This same thing happens when massive layers of rock scrape past one another during the formation of things like angular unconformities. Which is how we know that they werent deposited as soft sediment. Rather they formed by the motion of dense solid rock layers moving over one another.

And then, much like in the OP here, you have these features as an angular unconformity then further overlain by flat non-deformed layers, suggesting that the unconformity formed before the layers above were ever deposited (else the layers above would be tilted too).

Ie, the OP interpretation of deep time more accurately represents the evidence.
 
Reactions: SavedByGrace3
Upvote 0