Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sun's revolution. Not to be confused with the daily rotation of the universe.I would like you to explain how the rotation rate of the universe changes with seasons and how it can be instantly changed out to the farthest star by massive earthquakes.
If they are unrelated, why do they take the same period of time?Sun's revolution. Not to be confused with the daily rotation of the universe.
If they are unrelated, why do they take the same period of time?
Actually a sidereal day is slightly shorter than a "solar day" because the earth revolves around the sun in a prograde manner.If they are unrelated, why do they take the same period of time?
Yes, but Occam's Razor rejects such a conclusion, and I presume he goes on to argue something similar shortly thereafter.In your airplane example, there is no known mechanism for how the earth can go around the plane. There is a mechanism for why the plane would be moving relative to the earth.
As E. Mach, H. Thirring, J. Lense, P. Gerber, A. Einstein et. al. have shown, there is really no known mechanism for the earth's motion which cannot be taken as the universe's rotation.
- A. Einstein
Parallax doesn't respond to an up/down motion. It's a motion perpendicular to that direction.
How does it work?
Orbits don't behave like that. It is called an orbital plane for a reason.Revolution of the sun takes 365 days. Parallax measurements are taken 6 months apart.
The following is an .avi video of the yearly / daily motions. At first it will show you the yearly motion, then it will show you the yearly / daily motions combined.
http://www.geocentricity.com/bibastron/research/orrery/mechano/motion.avi
Orbits don't behave like that. It is called an orbital plane for a reason.
Dr. Bouw said:It is generally believed, without evidence, that in the geocentric model the sun, moon, planets, and distant stars all orbit the earth once per day. There is no orbiting involved. What is happening is that the firmament is rotating. Now the nature of the firmament is such that it defines all the physics of the universe, both the local and the universal, protophysics (Chapter 11, page 116). This means that all the “laws” of physics are part and parcel of the firmament and that the firmament acts like a medium for the laws of science. So it is that in a geocentric model the sun, moon, and stars do not gravitationally orbit the earth daily any more than that a molecule in a top gravitationally orbits the center of the top. In the case of the spinning top it is the fibers and material of the top which carry the molecules around the axis of the top. By the same token, in the geocentric model it is the fabric of the firmament which carries the universe about it. A second common misconception is related to the first and that is that the geocentric universe requires that the sun orbit the earth once per year. Again, this is not the case. In a geocentric universe Newton’s (or Einstein’s) laws must be fulfilled just as in a heliocentric universe. Newton’s law of gravity states that from the sun’s perspective, the earth must be seen to revolve about it once per year. It matters not to the sun whether the earth actually does so or appears to do so; remember that we are talking about relative motion, not absolute. If the firmament were to possess a wobble (about which we will say later) which carries the sun, planets, and stars about the earth once a year in such a way that the earth seems to describe an orbit around the sun, then the sun and the universe are content that the law of gravity is being satisfied. Remember, the physics of the universe which specify the law of gravity is fastened to the firmament, not the earth or sun.
If it is not gravity holding the sun in place, then what force is?Of course orbits don't behave like that. When did I say Geocentricity had to resemble orbits?
If it is not gravity holding the sun in place, then what force is?
Answer the question"A second common misconception is related to the first and that is that the geocentric universe requires that the sun orbit the earth once per year. Again, this is not the case. In a geocentric universe Newton’s (or Einstein’s) laws must be fulfilled just as in a heliocentric universe. Newton’s law of gravity states that from the sun’s perspective, the earth must be seen to revolve about it once per year. It matters not to the sun whether the earth actually does so or appears to do so; remember that we are talking about relative motion, not absolute."
I'd have to understand massive superstrings to respond properly to that question.
No, it doesn't. If the stars were "focused" on the Sun as you say, and the Sun moved as you claim, then parallax would be in the north/south direction. Instead, parallax occurs in the east/west direction.
Yeah, that's exactly how I was thinking you were claiming it was. It's wrong. The yearly parallax in that model would, indeed, be in the north/south direction. It's not, it's in the east/west direction, so you're wrong.You simplify it way too much. Watch the following video, it demonstrates the yearly motion, then the yearly and daily motions combined.
http://www.geocentricity.com/bibastron/research/orrery/mechano/motion.avi
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?