Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What kind of credentials are you talking about? Like having a seminary degree? That does not count as merit to being a Christian.
I agree. I'm curious tho... have you seen the sign on the door? The one up there that says 'Christians Only'. Because when I see a sign like that you can bet your life that you'll find me standing outside with the 'undesirables'. That's why it says agnostic over there. I wonder though... where would Christ be... inside with the so-called Christians or outside with the undesirables like me?
You still have not answered my question though about your "credentials."
Let me know when you figure that one out.
Do they though? Absent anecdotes what evidence is there that that is ever the case? Your vid is chock full of claims and nothing else.Some of them do do that.
That is terrible advice. In peer review examining how the study is carried out is a vital part in determining whether it is valid research.Read the studies rather than asking how the studies are done is my advice.
This has been claimed but where has it been verified?I think you missed the part about these people knowing things it is impossible for them to know.
This just shows you are not viewing the evidence fairly. In the case of these NDEs, they are literally trying their hardest to find a natural cause and not finding any.
Do they though? Absent anecdotes what evidence is there that that is ever the case? Your vid is chock full of claims and nothing else.
When asked your are reluctant to point to any specific example and cite trust in the interlocutor as a good enough reason to believe.
The guy on the vid’s website takes one straight to his storefront; he makes money by selling books to people who believe him. That alone should tell you that he has a vested interest in people buying in to his ideas.
Well people need to eat too, especially when they’re dedicating their whole life to researching something. And they’re not making a whole lot of money off these books.
Meanwhile a lot of materialist junk science that atheists cite has a lot of influence/backing from major corporations. Such as manipulating research/data, threats against scientists who go against the common ideas, etc.
His net worth is estimated at $1-5 million. That’s a whole lot of merch.And they’re not making a whole lot of money off these books.
Why is that a problem for you?
Why should we assume there is a naturalistic answer for everything? I honestly would love to hear your reason for that. And don't say, "because the supernatural cannot be demonstrated," because it literally can be. There are so many stories of answers to prayer and healings for no apparent medical reason that to say there is a naturalistic answer for these things just shows your commitment to naturalism more than anything. When people are healed in the name of Jesus, that's an indication of supernatural power, not just that a naturalistic answer is unknown. Saying there is a naturalistic answer for these healings is simply incredulity towards the supernatural.
At this point they’ve completely run out of naturalistic explanations. And these are neuroscientists with years of experience. If it was a natural thing they would’ve figured it out easily years agoI'm going to copy and paste the part of my comment that you left off because I feel it answers the incredulity you have easier:
Yes, that is true. But that does not necessarily preclude that a supernatural cause is the answer. A lack of evidence for one thing does not equal evidence for something else. If we assume that the world operates by natural laws, then there has to be natural explanations for everything. And that is the only assumption that science of any kind can and will make.
At this point they’ve completely run out of naturalistic explanations. And these are neuroscientists with years of experience. If it was a natural thing they would’ve figured it out easily years ago
AT the point of death
That's literally how they do the studies.
No, asking people their experiences of NDEs is not the same as studying people who are at the point of death
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?