• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
13,761
5,824
60
Mississippi
✟322,509.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Which is why they would be different accounts using different information to build their points. Even if you do look at them as the same accounts there still is a problem. Gen 2 doesn't have plants sprouting before man and Gen 1 does.

Show one verse in Genesis 2 where it is stated that man was created before the plants.

Also show a day (first,second,thrid,etc..) given for the creation of man in Genesis 2 and while you are doing that, show a day that the plants were created. It is not there because Genesis 2 is not giving an account of creation order, that was done in Genesis 1

Verse 5 in Genesis 2 tells why there was no plant or herb yet, because God had not water the earth to make these plants and herbs to grow. There is nothing about verse 5 and an order of creation.

The next verse tells how God created Adam, because in Genesis 1 God does not tell how.
So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

But in Genesis 2:7 we see some of how God created Adam.

And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.

Again noting in that verse about an order of creation just a little detail of Gods creation method.
 
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
11,203
9,245
65
Martinez
✟1,149,756.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What translation are you using? I do not see humans or mankind in the KJV. I see man.

26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.


The reason male and female creatures are not separated is because this account was not written to them, it was written to us. Men and women.
 
Upvote 0

DamianWarS

Follower of Isa Al Masih
Site Supporter
May 15, 2008
10,143
3,442
✟999,988.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
the hebrew word is "adam" strongs says "aw-dam'; from H119; ruddy i.e. a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.)". NIV uses "mankind" others say "human" or "human being", the most common is "man"
 
Upvote 0

DamianWarS

Follower of Isa Al Masih
Site Supporter
May 15, 2008
10,143
3,442
✟999,988.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

if they are different accounts one is built up using days and the other is not so there is no need to speak of days in Gen 2. In the Gen 1 account Day 3 plants are created and would appear to be in full bloom, seed, fruit etc... the order of plants here probably is important because many creatures depend on them for food such as birds and fish (day 5) and insects and many other land animals (day 6). If there were no plants because the rain hasn't come yet or because they weren't tilled yet this would present a problem for the creatures that depend on plants to survive. many insects have a very short life cycle and wouldn't survive the wait. But if these are two separate accounts there really is no conflict because they are not meant to be reconciled together and just stand as separate accounts of a creation both with a different focus.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
13,761
5,824
60
Mississippi
✟322,509.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single

You are overlooking a major point there was no death yet, Adam had not sinned until he ate of the fruit. So death was not in/part the creation.
 
Upvote 0

DamianWarS

Follower of Isa Al Masih
Site Supporter
May 15, 2008
10,143
3,442
✟999,988.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
You are overlooking a major point there was no death yet, Adam had not sinned until he ate of the fruit. So death was not in/part the creation.
death is implicit pre-fall (like the death of seed for new life to grow) I also might add a strict no death before the fall is not a widely accepted position and typically even literal creationist accept death, just not the death of creatures with a soul (man). don't believe me? See for yourself. You may still claim there was no death you just do so largely alone and perhaps it's best to start a new thread discussing it if it's something you are passionate about.
 
Upvote 0

-57

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2015
8,701
1,957
✟77,658.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
There is no conflict of the order of creation.
...I haven't been through the entire thread yet, perhaps you will present the conflicts.
 
Upvote 0

Ronald

Exhortations
Site Supporter
Jul 30, 2004
4,620
981
southern
✟111,578.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

He created on all six days. "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth."
Day One
He created Earth. It goes on to describe it being formless and void, with water, just like a floating bubble, like a lava lamp. Evidently since there was no stars, planets or moon yet with the physics, gravitational forces, it was a basic lump that He then worked on. He created light on the first day as well - this was light that was a physical light with waves, particles, the color spectrum - very complex, but notice it did not come from the sun, created on the 4th day. It radiated from Himself onto a physical earth.
Day Two
Separating the waters, was an act of creation as well, our breathable atmosphere, the clouds, the upper atmosphere, a protective barrier from space and this of course involves gravity.
Day Three.
He gathered the waters onto seas rivers and lakes and allowed dry land. And then created all the botanicals.
Day Four
Sun, moon, and the rest of the universe.
Obviously the botanicals could not survive too long without the sun. This proves 1 day equals 24 hours, not epochs of time.
DAY FIVE
Sea life of all kinds.
Day Six
Animals of all kinds and finally Man.
Notice, God finished all His work by the end of the sixth day. Therefore, all events, order and creation of Eve in chapter 2 are details about the first six days.
Day Seven
He rested
What you seem to be confused about is the style of writing. The Hebrews have a style of outlining their thoughts, introducing the basic information in a paragraph or chapter first, then going back and filling in the details in the next paragraph or chapter. This is what Genesis 2 is, details about Genesis 1.
You will see this style throughout the Bible.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

-57

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2015
8,701
1,957
✟77,658.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

The account presented in Genesis is literal account of how the Word that became flesh created and how mankind fell in Adam.

In fact this view is strongly supportrf in Pauls letter to Timothy he explains how women should act in church....and Paul provides a reason based upon a literal interpretation of Genesis.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

-57

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2015
8,701
1,957
✟77,658.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
"Now no shrub had yet appeared on the earth and no plant had yet sprung up,..." NKJV

Genesis 2:5 doesn't say that plants weren't created, yet. In fact, the highlighted parts tell us that plants were present (just not yet visible).
These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created,
in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens. When no bush of the field was yet in the land and no small plant of the field had yet sprung up

When you take out the verse numbers and simply read what it says...it says there was a time when the heavens and earth were created and there was no plants. The verses are a sort of transition into the creation of Adam and Eve.
 
Upvote 0

DamianWarS

Follower of Isa Al Masih
Site Supporter
May 15, 2008
10,143
3,442
✟999,988.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
can you give me some biblical examples of this style? Hebraic block logic may also have two opposing thoughts side by side that creates a tension. This tension is meant to be left unanswered and simply exist in tension.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

JacksBratt

Searching for Truth
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2014
16,294
6,495
63
✟596,843.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
can you give me some biblical examples of this style? Hebraic block logic may also have two opposing thought side by side that creates a tension. This tension is meant to be left unanswered and simply exist in tension.
People are talking to you.... just stop..... read.... comprehend.... and learn.
 
Upvote 0

DamianWarS

Follower of Isa Al Masih
Site Supporter
May 15, 2008
10,143
3,442
✟999,988.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Who told you it was literal? Paul takes from the account in the same way one would take from a non-literal account. Non-literal doesn't mean "make believe" it is truth presented in extremely precise words that has a greater focus then the literal. We may take the same approach using the parables which are also non-literal accounts.
 
Upvote 0

-57

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2015
8,701
1,957
✟77,658.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

The bible in several places presents Genesis as a literal and historical event.

Why would Paul instruct the women of the church and base it upon something that never happened?

1 Tim 2: 13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve; 14 and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.

If the above verse never happened....then what did happen?
 
Reactions: Ronald
Upvote 0

DamianWarS

Follower of Isa Al Masih
Site Supporter
May 15, 2008
10,143
3,442
✟999,988.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It does say...8 And the LORD God planted a garden in Eden,
It also tells us that there was no plants because it hadn't rained yet and because man was there to cultivate it. Then immediately after God makes man, then he makes a garden.

It is important to show that a punishment for man was being thrown out this garden and to laboriously work the soil and eat of the very plants that haven't shouted yet. The garden seems to be a gift for the hardships life offers.
 
Upvote 0

DamianWarS

Follower of Isa Al Masih
Site Supporter
May 15, 2008
10,143
3,442
✟999,988.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Why would Paul instruct the women of the church and base it upon something that never happened?
Because God ordained the words. If this is true it doesn't matter if it happened, what matters is what God says.

If the above verse never happened....then what did happen?
I am agnostic to what happen, except that God did it so I have no replacement theories for you. I wasn't there so I don't know.
 
Upvote 0