• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

Just realized reification is probably not a word everyone is familiar with...

 
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

A2SG

Gumby
Jun 17, 2008
9,846
3,839
Massachusetts
✟172,055.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Except that Trump was not prohibited from commenting on the trial itself, or his defense. The only prohibition was on personal attacks of court personnel.

He could still proclaim his innocence all he wanted to.

-- A2SG, and did...often....
 
Upvote 0

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
41,675
16,772
Fort Smith
✟1,428,973.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Personally attacking courthouse personnel is not "defending oneself." And in the case of a defendant whose followers have stormed the Capitol, broken windows and furniture, threatened to hang the VP, caused the deaths of Capitol police, etc. a personal attack could unleash a wave of violence on the victim.
Didn't two Georgia poll workers just win $100 million+ because Guiliani personally attacked them?
When defending oneself, facts should be used--if available.
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Personally attacking courthouse personnel is not "defending oneself."

Well....

It is if it's a kangaroo court.

Though the expression is largely gone, we have a victimless "crime" with the judgement predetermined so I think it fits.



And in the case of a defendant whose followers have stormed the Capitol, broken windows and furniture, threatened to hang the VP, caused the deaths of Capitol police, etc.

I think if they could have hoped to charge him with insurrection they would...

It's DC after all, solidly Democrats, wouldn't be difficult to find a grand jury.

Harder to find a judge who wouldn't throw it out. It has to be rather clear.

a personal attack could unleash a wave of violence on the victim.

Or worse....legitimate scrutiny. That's destroying the Georgia case rather quickly and I'm more inclined to believe he's guilty in that one.

Didn't two Georgia poll workers just win $100 million+ because Guiliani personally attacked them?

Well he spread an unsubstantiated rumor. I don't know if there was a personal attack.


When defending oneself, facts should be used--if available.

The fact is its a sham trial. Civil fraud?

Real estate is a speculative market. Market values are haggled but not completely detached from supply/demand. Unless there's some wild changes in real estate under Biden....this case seems to be a sad attempt to remove a political opponent.
 
Reactions: ralliann
Upvote 0