Slander and libel is protected to a point by the first amendment. There is established law guiding how slander and libel work in conjunction with the first amendment.Yep. And slander or libel have never been protected by the constitution, either.
Seems a valid comparison to me.
Well that's the judges excuse anyway. His gag order has been overturned. Which means at least another judge disagrees with him. We'll see how it all turns out in the end.For that specific instance, I'd agree with you. But Trump's case is different. Judge Engoron is trying to ensure Trump gets a fair trial, and his using social media to personally attack members of the court staff could impede that, so he imposed a gag order. This isn't a blanket restriction on criticizing government officials, but a specific one, and only on those specifically and directly involved with the trial in which he is the defendant.
Trump getting a fair trial is the goal here. And, let's face it, a fair trial is the last thing Trump wants.
I think Trump want a fair trial, but he also wants to speak his mind when he doesn't feel like he's getting one. Let's face it, Trump wants to be able to speak his mind on everything. And he will use his wild bombastic approach that so many can't stand.
So he can't criticize THIS public official. Well gee then we can can certainly extrapolate that it would be okay to punish anyone for criticizing the president. AND our answer would be, the order doesn't prevent you from criticizing any other governmental officials just THIS one involving his decisions on THIS particular issue. Yeah I'm not seeing your logic here.do. And the gag order doesn't prevent Trump from criticizing the president or any other government officials. Just the specific court personnel involved in the trial for which he is the defendant.
Upvote
0