From land animal to ocean-dweller

Jfrsmth

Active Member
Aug 13, 2015
362
51
Philippines
✟8,740.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
No, they wouldn't. Any fossil of any species group found under rocks that are 65 million years old are accepted as being at least 65 million years old.

You haven't shown that it is unrealistic for these features to have been preserved for 65 million years. You are begging the question.

The facts are this. Dinosaurs are ALWAYS found below rocks that are at least 65 million years old. It is the ROCKS that give the fossils their age.

They are accepted as 65 million years old based on an evolutionary worldview of millions of years. Of course that makes sense to someone thinking like that. They would never think that the fossils were laid only a few thousand years ago as a result of a worldwide flood.

"Begging the question" ... hmmm, sounds like somebody has been studying "logical fallacies"? How am I begging the question?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,141
Visit site
✟98,005.00
Faith
Agnostic
They are accepted as 65 million years old based on an evolutionary worldview of millions of years.

It has nothing to do with evolution. The age of rocks are determined by radiometric dating which uses the ratio of isotopes in the rock itself to establish its age. It is completely independent of evolution or any fossils found above or below the rocks.

They would never think that the fossils were laid only a few thousand years ago as a result of a worldwide flood.

Just like astronomers will never think that the Sun orbits the Earth. It's kind of hard to ignore the evidence demonstrating that there was no recent global flood.
 
Upvote 0

-57

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2015
8,699
1,957
✟70,048.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It has nothing to do with evolution. The age of rocks are determined by radiometric dating which uses the ratio of isotopes in the rock itself to establish its age. It is completely independent of evolution or any fossils found above or below the rocks.

Then the scientist found soft dino tissue...which upset the apple cart.
dont_upset_the_apple_cart_iphone_plus_6_tough_cas.jpg
 
Upvote 0

Astrophile

Newbie
Aug 30, 2013
2,277
1,519
76
England
✟233,273.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Widowed
There are a lot of young people in schools who see representations such as this in textbooks:

11419321426_351855d846_n.jpg

(Image also attached)

We have a lot of pretty pictures in the textbooks and lots of fossils, being used to discourage, raise doubts, and destroy the faith of Christians, young and old as well as indoctrinating the public at large with the religion of evolution. It's everywhere!

However, the pretty pictures and fossils are just that: select pictures presented in a progression that favor and give apparent transition from one creature to another, based on where they find these creatures in the fossil record, i.e. "geologic column."

These pictures present natural selection as a "forward thinking" entity, "selecting future function instead of actual function", causing changes with an intended goal in mind; as opposed to the random, independent changes that natural selection is supposedly to be.

The only science here however, is that yes, there are fossils of these creatures, but that is as far as it goes. Everything else is conjecture, but not bona fide science. Transition from one creature to another cannot be verified or falsified, because it is based on interpretation and worldviews. That is, evolutionists look at the bones and say, "something is changing into something else"; while creationists look at the bones and and say, "something died."

I would like to invite Christian forum members more eloquent than I to provide encouraging remarks that might help Christians, young or old, as well as others who may be seeking answers, understand the fallacy of evolutionism as it relates to these images.

I can't read the names of the animals in your image. However, to come to the point, do you think that these animals form a temporal sequence, or do you think that they all lived at the same time?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Tbarjr

Member
Sep 18, 2015
10
7
35
✟7,685.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Do you have any speciation where DNA information has been increased via beneficial mutations?

Information increases as a result of copying errors, where an extra chromosome or section of a chromosome is accidentally passed to the next generation. A common version of this in humans is Down Syndrome, where the person is born with a whole extra chromosome and has certain differences in physical and psychological traits than a normal person. It is not necessarily a positive or negative change. It is simply a change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0