durangodawood
re Member
- Aug 28, 2007
- 27,699
- 19,371
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What do you make of this?...........Do those "prior causes" make decisions for you, or do you make the decisions? If you make the decisions, then your will is not outside of your control, and the prior causes merely form an influencing factor in your decision. Influence is not equivalent to control.
And what "prior causes" do you mean anyway?
...The soul might not be physically determined, but that doesn't mean it isn't psychologically determined. For example, I might consider reasons X,Y, and Z, when choosing to do action M. If reasons X,Y, and Z fully explain why I chose to do M, then I am determined. If they don't fully explain why I choose to do M (and nothing does), then my choice to do M is random.
Again, there doesn't seem to be any possibility for anything other than determinism or randomness.
Do those "prior causes" make decisions for you, or do you make the decisions? If you make the decisions, then your will is not outside of your control, and the prior causes merely form an influencing factor in your decision. Influence is not equivalent to control.
And what "prior causes" do you mean anyway?
What do you make of this?...........
I make decisions. But what does it mean to make decisions? It is to look at the current situation and use my reasoning and desires. Where do my reasoning and desires come from?
They come from what I am. What I am is the product of prior causes: things that make me and are in the past. If we trace the causal chain back, we find that all of what I am is given to me from causes outside of my control: my biology, my early childhood, etc.
The fact that you make decisions means that you are exercising your own will. The prior causes you mention are only factors that affect your will, but it does not override the will or render it non-existent. In fact, how your childhood is like, how your biology is are also determined by the will of others. Nothing can be determined in your life apart from your will or the exercise of other people's will on your life.
What is a "will"?
The conscious part of the mind that allows you to make decisions, just like you claim you can do.
Where does this conscious part of my mind come from? Why is it different from someone else's?
Arguably not a science? Then you certainly know nothing about psychology. Psychology as a whole has certain scientific elements to it (including studying how the brain works), which probably you have not even heard of. Your idea of science is probably so narrow much of this universe will not even be explainable.
If you desire to remain in your secluded scientific world I have no objections, just don't try to make everyone agree only with your notion of reality.
If you believe in God, then you know the source is God. What do you mean by different? In substance, will is the same for all, it is an ability to make decisions, there is no difference in substance.
The fact that you can ask two human brains if there is free will and get two different answers seems to me good evidence for free will.
Even better, has a philosopher ever changed from believing to not believing? Has a Calvinist ever become orthodox, or vice versa? I'm sure it happens.
Then you can will yourself not to submit to the effects of drugs, alcohol, sedatives, etc? Amazing.Yes, nothing can override it unless you willingly submit it to obey something else's influence.
I do not think that the OP or the article I linked made that argument.My point here was to refute the argument that free will does not exist.
Free will that you cannot exercise? Is that like the smaller sizes of jumbo shrimp?I believe free will exists, independently of whether we can exercise it or not.
In what way does this offer more explanatory power than having the mind as an emergent property of the brain?It is simply an invisibly conscious part of our mind, which relies on proper functioning of the brain to actually materialise in our decisions or actions.
Determinism doesn't mean static or that everyone will think the same.
Your argument is based upon belief. I heavily doubt the ability to honestly change your beliefs at the flip of a switch. Belief is not a free choice. I can't actually choose to be convinced by something.
Then you can will yourself not to submit to the effects of drugs, alcohol, sedatives, etc? Amazing.
Free will that you cannot exercise? Is that like the smaller sizes of jumbo shrimp?
In what way does this offer more explanatory power than having the mind as an emergent property of the brain?
Are you a dualist?
One could argue that if determinism were true it would mean that. Ergo, it's not true.
...
Determinism mean prior conditions are 100% of the reason for future outcomes.I do not see how determinism (as you guys call it) mean the non-existent of free will. In fact, how can determinism even exist if there was no exercise of will in the first place to determine what should be?
One could argue that if determinism were true it would mean that. Ergo, it's not true.
It happens all the time, probably not at the flip of a swith, but it happens.
If that were the case, why can my wife drink two glasses of wine, when, after half a glass, I must go lie down and sleep it off? Are you saying I should be able to will myself free of those effects?Did you read what I said? I said nothing can override your will UNLESS you willingly submit your will to that thing's influence. Isn't submitting to the effects of alcohol etc the exact same thing as "willingly submit your will to that thing's influence"? Amazing lack of understanding.
I am not arguing for the non-existence of free will. However, free will that you cannot exercise is effectively non-existence, which is what you are describing, are you not?Is that a surprise? Cannot exercise does not equate non-existence. Is that an impossibility to you?
This is a philosophy forum, and the order of the words does have importance. That the "mind" affects the brain, or is an emergent property of the brain, are two fundamentally difference concepts.Lol? I see no argument provided here other than an attempt to create confusion by the use of words that essentially refer to the same substance of things.
My questions are tailored to the context in which they are placed.And by your repetitive mindless question on the other thread
"Actively", when what was asked for was "directly".despite the fact that I actively answered it multiple times,
Your answers have not amounted to much anyway.I see no need to answer you any further.
Must you throw insults at those you disagree with?If you are a troll, just say so.
I do not dispute that it happens - I have experienced such things myself.One could argue that if determinism were true it would mean that. Ergo, it's not true.
It happens all the time, probably not at the flip of a swith, but it happens.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?