• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Free Will: Yea or Nay?

WoundedDeep

Newbie
Oct 21, 2014
903
38
33
✟16,443.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
What would you say, a schizophrenic who is disconnected from the concept of his will to do much about it? Or a dementia patient who is all that a schizophrenic is but with even less will to control their body?

You raise a good point. But I believe there is a difference between saying that will does not exist and saying that something prevents/hinders the exercise of our will. Does the schizophrenic or dementia patient have no will at all? Definitely not, but they might be hindered from exercising that will due to their condition.
 
Upvote 0

Inkfingers

Somebody's heretic
Site Supporter
May 17, 2014
5,638
1,547
✟205,762.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
What about free will as a cause?

Will is also an effect of previous causes; and so not free.

If something is caused it is not free.

If something is not caused it is random and not will.

The whole universe is evidence that every event happens as an effect of causes (that includes our thoughts, beliefs, feelings, etc). Special pleading for a subjective feeling that is based in ignorance of how we fit into a wider order, and which offers zero actual evidence, does not challenge that in any way.

I'm not going through this again. We've had multiple threads on this recently and a great many people simply do not understand the concepts.
 
Upvote 0

WoundedDeep

Newbie
Oct 21, 2014
903
38
33
✟16,443.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Are you having trouble understanding the question? Do you have some science to substantiate that opinion of yours, or is it just opinion?

I have raised psychology as the "science to substantiate" twice already, do you not understand my simple English?
 
Upvote 0

Star Adept

Active Member
Feb 8, 2015
329
17
✟541.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Will is also an effect of previous causes; and so not free.

I'm not going through this again. We've had multiple threads on this recently and a great many people simply do not understand the concepts.

First time I've seen it, I understand. Valid answer.
 
Upvote 0

Star Adept

Active Member
Feb 8, 2015
329
17
✟541.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

I didn't say free will didn't exist. But you did claim that nothing could override it. That's what I was responding to.

However: what is will if not something we can exercise? Does will exist to you, because you know you have it? How do you know you have it, because you exercise it?
 
Upvote 0

Davian

fallible
May 30, 2011
14,100
1,181
West Coast of Canada
✟46,103.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
Married
I have raised psychology as the "science to substantiate" twice already, do you not understand my simple English?
Simple indeed.

Hand-waving towards a field of study that is arguably not a science fails to substantiate your opinion.

If you have no scientific citations to support your opinion, just say so.
 
Upvote 0

WoundedDeep

Newbie
Oct 21, 2014
903
38
33
✟16,443.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Simple indeed.

Hand-waving towards a field of study that is arguably not a science fails to substantiate your opinion.

If you have no scientific citations to support your opinion, just say so.

Arguably not a science? Then you certainly know nothing about psychology. Psychology as a whole has certain scientific elements to it (including studying how the brain works), which probably you have not even heard of. Your idea of science is probably so narrow much of this universe will not even be explainable.

If you desire to remain in your secluded scientific world I have no objections, just don't try to make everyone agree only with your notion of reality.
 
Upvote 0

WoundedDeep

Newbie
Oct 21, 2014
903
38
33
✟16,443.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Yes, nothing can override it unless you willingly submit it to obey something else's influence. My point here was to refute the argument that free will does not exist.

I believe free will exists, independently of whether we can exercise it or not. It is simply an invisibly conscious part of our mind, which relies on proper functioning of the brain to actually materialise in our decisions or actions.
 
Upvote 0

lesliedellow

Member
Sep 20, 2010
9,654
2,582
United Kingdom
Visit site
✟119,577.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Science, philosophy and theology all seem to point to the answer no. At least if what you mean by free will is the power of contrary choice.

If you mean only the ability to act in accordance with your wishes, then that is compatible with both determinism (science/philosophy) and with predestination (theology).
 
Upvote 0

WoundedDeep

Newbie
Oct 21, 2014
903
38
33
✟16,443.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Science, philosophy and theology all seem to point to the answer no. At least if what you mean by free will is the power of contrary choice.

Can you explain the bolded part in greater detail, preferably with an example? Thanks in advance.
 
Upvote 0

WoundedDeep

Newbie
Oct 21, 2014
903
38
33
✟16,443.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
You said I would have to willingly submit to the influence that influences me to lose my will.

Yes you have to willingly stop the exercise of your will for the influence to overpower you (provided you have a functioning brain that is completely healthy), but I didn't say you will ever lose your will.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Star Adept

Active Member
Feb 8, 2015
329
17
✟541.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Will myself to stop the exercise of will? Isn't willing myself to stop exercising my will? And clearly it's not a permanent loss of will, but if gone too far, I can lose concept of my will. If the influence is overpowering me, how do I get back to a state by which I can will again? I can't will it back with no concept of will.
 
Upvote 0

quatona

"God"? What do you mean??
May 15, 2005
37,512
4,302
✟182,802.00
Faith
Seeker
Personally, I don´t like the idea that my thoughts are uncaused, i.e. random.
Since this wouldn´t be very plausible, either, I don´t care much about this version of "free will".


Personally, I am tending towards the notion that our reactions are way more "impulsive" than it seems to us (not withstanding the post-hoc rationalizations we come up with).

Neurologically speaking, free will or lack thereof is an unproven hypothesis at best, so for now we're just going to have to settle with somewhat educated philosophical speculation.
I have never really understood what people actually mean when saying "free will".
What limitations would their will have to be free of in order for them to call it "free"?
Also, I find the idea that my will is free to will what it wants a little scary. It would mean that I am not free, in that I am a slave to my will.
 
Upvote 0

Chany

Uncertain Absurdist
Nov 29, 2011
6,428
228
In bed
✟30,379.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

My decision-making process is determined by prior causes. So, I think about the options and pick one, but my will and the way I think is outside of my control, in that they are formed by prior causes.

Why do I desire to go back to sleep?
 
Upvote 0

WoundedDeep

Newbie
Oct 21, 2014
903
38
33
✟16,443.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
My decision-making process is determined by prior causes. So, I think about the options and pick one, but my will and the way I think is outside of my control, in that they are formed by prior causes.

Why do I desire to go back to sleep?

Do those "prior causes" make decisions for you, or do you make the decisions? If you make the decisions, then your will is not outside of your control, and the prior causes merely form an influencing factor in your decision. Influence is not equivalent to control.

And what "prior causes" do you mean anyway?
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,739
19,402
Colorado
✟541,707.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Does this mean free-will cannot arise from some highly complex arrangement of matter?
 
Upvote 0