Abbadon said:
And also look out for people that play Dungeons and Dragons. Some of them tend to get into philosophy.
Oh that's great!!! Haha.
Alright, I'm a 19 year old college student majoring in philosophy, and my favorite philosopher is, without competition, Nietzsche. I've also played Dungeons & Dragons for as long as I can remember. Your guess is probably right on. I suppose us geeks have a tendency to not be part of the "herd".
Nietzsche's importance as a philosopher is probably not as great as it should be. I think he deserves even more credit than he's given, and that credit is, as has already been said, misapplied. Fortunately all the baloney associating him with the nazi party seems to be fading away as he's had sort of a "revival". I'd like to see that trend continue, as I think Nietzsche has a lot to offer. He's "the philosopher with a hammer", but people often forget that hammers are used for building, and not merely destroying. He wanted to oust the apathetic confirmist inclinations in man, but he didn't merely wish to plunge us into nihilism. Nihilism was the result of a loss of God, not the end. We must erect "new gods", in a sense. Find new direction, after the demise of the creator.
I do understand though, most people in my generation seem not to be too interested in philosophy, but they're around if you really seek them out. I've met a few. And actually Nietzsche said "Plato was a bore", himself, and I tend to agree. Being a philosopher doesn't preclude boredom with some of the classics.
He's popular with the teenage population because it is the teens who are often the most idealistic, hoping to be movers and shakers in society. Nietzsche appeals to the rebellious side of people, the side that still wants to break free from the mold. Older folks are often too entrenched in society to have any desire or will to break from it. One could definitely write an entire paper on why he appeals to the younger crowd, though.
I wouldn't try to place him in philosophy. You might say there's existentialism/pre-existentialism or something of the sort in his writing, but I think pigeonholing him would do an injustice to the unique nature of his philosophy.
I wrote a paper on his concept of the ubermensch. Not sure if I'm allowed to post links here but it is available online. I suppose you can PM me if you want the link, or it's cool I'll post it up here.