Former President Donald Trump Indicted for willful retention of national defense documents, obstruction of justice and conspiracy

Whyayeman

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2018
3,971
2,581
Worcestershire
✟164,952.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
“I’m having a hard time seeing how this work can be accomplished realistically in this period of time,” Cannon said.
Easy-peasy. Hire new lawyers. I have never heard of a case postponed because the defendant's lawyer was 'too busy'. This judge is either stupidly incompetent or biassed. This is an abuse of the judge's power.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,671
36,997
Los Angeles Area
✟837,900.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

Attorney warned Trump 'it's going to be a crime' if he didn't comply with subpoena for classified docs: Sources


One of former president Donald Trump's current attorneys told special counsel Jack Smith's team that, within days of the Justice Department issuing a subpoena last year for all classified documents at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, she "very clearly" warned Trump that if he failed to fully comply -- but then swore he did -- "it's going to be a crime," according to sources familiar with the matter.

She wanted to explain to Trump that whatever happened before with the National Archives "just doesn't matter," especially because Trump never swore to them, under the penalty of perjury, that he had turned everything over, sources said. But whatever happens now has "a legal ramification," Little said she tried to emphasize to Trump, according to the sources.

"Once this is signed -- if anything else is located -- it's going to be a crime," sources quoted Little as recalling she told Trump.

The former president said something to the effect of, "OK, I get it,'" the sources said she recalled to investigators.

Before Little and Corcoran left Mar-a-Lago, Trump agreed that Corcoran, as Trump's lead attorney on the matter at the time, should return to Mar-a-Lago in the coming days to search for any classified documents.

But over the next two weeks, before Corcoran searched a basement storage room he was directed to, Trump's two co-defendants in the documents case, Mar-a-Lago staffers Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, allegedly removed dozens of boxes from the storage room -- all "at Trump's direction"
 
  • Informative
Reactions: wing2000
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,671
36,997
Los Angeles Area
✟837,900.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
  • Informative
Reactions: wing2000
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,671
36,997
Los Angeles Area
✟837,900.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

Donald Trump Tried to Corrupt Attorney in Classified Docs Case—Prosecutor

Former President Donald Trump tried to corrupt his own attorney into hiding classified documents, prosecutors alleged.

When the attorney refused, Trump got two of his own assistants to hide the documents from the attorney and cover up the CCTV video evidence, according to the latest filing in Trump's classified documents case in Florida.

"Failing in his effort to corrupt the attorney, Trump enlisted his trusted body man, codefendant Waltine Nauta, in a scheme to deceive the attorney by moving boxes to conceal his [Trump's] continued possession of classified documents. As a result, Trump, through his attorney, again returned only a portion of the classified documents in his possession while falsely claiming that his production was complete," the document states.

Trump, Nauta and De Oliveira then allegedly tried to destroy the CCTV footage that proved they hid the boxes.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,671
36,997
Los Angeles Area
✟837,900.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

How legal fights and stalling by judge could push Trump documents trial after election

A criminal case that was once viewed as the most open-and-shut prosecution against former President Donald Trump has been mired in delay, unresolved logistical questions and fringe legal arguments that appear to have hijacked the judge’s attention.

US District Judge Aileen Cannon, who was appointed to the federal bench by Trump in 2020, has drawn out the case with an unusual, eyebrow-raising approach in her nearly 10-month oversight of the case, delaying rulings on what experts say are routine legal questions that must be resolved before the case can go to trial.

The longer it takes for Cannon to decide these issues, the more likely a trial would need to wait until after the November presidential election.

Cannon has yet to decide more than a dozen motions that have significant – and potentially fatal – implications for the criminal case, and legal experts are flummoxed by the massive amount of work she has left to do.

“I can assure you that in the background there is a great deal of judicial work going on,” she said at a March hearing for considering a new trial date. “So while it may not appear on the surface that anything is happening, there is a ton of work being done in the background.”
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
21,028
17,470
✟1,442,067.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Trump’s defense team argued that the Presidential Records Act (PRA) took priority over the Espionage Act when it came to highly classified documents that went to his private residence in Florida after his presidency. On Thursday, Cannon shot down that argument, saying the PRA “does not provide a pre-trial basis to dismiss” either the mishandling charges or the related obstruction charges against Trump.

...nor does the PRA have any place in this case - pre-trial or during the trial. Trump is charged under a criminal statute - Espionage Act.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0