For those wondering what "macroevolution" actually is...

[Job 33:6]

How do you falsify the theory that the history of life on earth is due to a process of natural selection acting on mutations?

You could show that mutations don't cause morphological change.

 

[AV1611VET]

Why not? Theories have been falsified before,

Mainly because I think the theory of evolution is going to get even stronger as time goes along; culminating in the Tribulation period.

 

[Buzzard3]

By finding a creature, or the fossilized remains of one, whose morphology cannot be explained by the theory. The classic conversational example is finding a fossilized rabbit amongst the other fossilized creatures of the Cambrian.

What's finding a rabbit fossil in the Cambrian got to do with falsifying the theory of selection acting on mutations?

 

[Astrid]

.

 

[Buzzard3]

Question for you: if life did not evolve through mutations and natural selection, what is the alternative?

I don't offer explanations for what was responsible for the history of life on earth. No one will ever know, so your question is pointless.

 

[Astrid]

How do you falsify the theory that the history of life on earth is due to a process of natural selection acting on mutations?

Demonstrate that the creationidts are correct in
" after its kind " , a set limit to possible change.

 

[Buzzard3]

You could show that mutations don't cause morphological change.

How would you show that?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I don't offer explanations for what was responsible for the history of life on earth. No one will ever know, so your question is pointless.

No, it kind of is a meaningful question.
If life did not evolve through mutations and natural selection, then what is the alternative? There has to be an alternative.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

What's finding a rabbit fossil in the Cambrian got to do with falsifying the theory of selection acting on mutations?

Because mammals are not found in the Cambrian layers of the fossil record.

 

[Buzzard3]

Mainly because I think the theory of evolution is going to get even stronger as time goes along; culminating in the Tribulation period.

The Catholic Church teaches that atheism is the last great heresy of mankind. The "religion" of atheism is evolution.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

The Catholic Church teaches that atheism is the last great heresy of mankind ... and the religion of atheism is evolution.

Atheism is to be without a religion.
Therefore, atheists cannot have a religion.

 

[Astrid]

The Catholic Church teaches that atheism is the last great heresy of mankind ... and the religion of atheism is evolution.

The catholic church calls atheism and evolution religion?

 

[AV1611VET]

Demonstrate that the creationidts are correct in
" after its kind " , a set limit to possible change.

Take a male from one genus, and a female from another genus, and see if they can produce a viable offspring.

If they can't, let's go with:

Kind = Genus

 

[AV1611VET]

If life did not evolve through mutations and natural selection, then what is the alternative?

Creatio ex materia.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Creatio ex materia.

I am not asking you. I want Buzzard's answer. Not yours.

 

[AV1611VET]

The Catholic Church teaches that atheism is the last great heresy of mankind ...

And guess Who is going to put an end to this heresy when He returns?

 

[Astrid]

Because mammals are not found in the Cambrian layers of the fossil record.

Thats a very inadequate explanation

 

[AV1611VET]

Atheism is to be without a religion.
Therefore, atheists cannot have a religion.

So atheists don't believe in God? or atheists don't believe in religion? which is it?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Thats a very inadequate explanation

It's really not. It's a simple one, but not inadequate.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

So atheists don't believe in God? or atheists don't believe in religion? which is it?

Again:
Atheism is to be without a religion.
Therefore, atheists cannot have a religion.