If you were in the place of Christian Slater a priest that went against the church when he felt that he had a cause to do it, would you do the same thing?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If you were in the place of Christian Slater a priest that went against the church when he felt that he had a cause to do it, would you do the same thing?
If you were in the place of Christian Slater a priest that went against the church when he felt that he had a cause to do it, would you do the same thing?
The story was a bit complicated, there was another priest first that was accused of a murder because he was with the murdered person in the crime scene and because of the Seal of confession the good priest did not disclose why he was at the crime scene to the police, rather he called after any priest in case he could help him or understand him and the priest was Christian Slater. Later the other priest was said that he killed himself in the prison and the bishops had a small statement about the case and that was it but Christian Slater wanted to investigate because he did not believe that the priest was innocent and the bishops ordered him to go to serve in another town but he refused and they fired him so he was no longer priest, Christian Slater continued the investigation with the help of a reporter and they uncovered the truth about the real murderer and he returned to his duty as a priest.
So what do you think about what Christian Slater did:
do you go against direct orders from who run the church if you believe that you are called for a righteous case even if the results are not guaranteed?
And what do you think about the priest that was accused of the murder? should the priest betray a confessor and violate the sacred sacramental seal of confession to save himself?
It was a long shot - and he disobeyed.The story was a bit complicated, there was another priest first that was accused of a murder because he was with the murdered person in the crime scene and because of the Seal of confession the good priest did not disclose why he was at the crime scene to the police, rather he called after any priest in case he could help him or understand him and the priest was Christian Slater. Later the other priest was said that he killed himself in the prison and the bishops had a small statement about the case and that was it but Christian Slater wanted to investigate because he did not believe that the priest was innocent and the bishops ordered him to go to serve in another town but he refused and they fired him so he was no longer priest, Christian Slater continued the investigation with the help of a reporter and they uncovered the truth about the real murderer and he returned to his duty as a priest.
So what do you think about what Christian Slater did:
do you go against direct orders from who run the church if you believe that you are called for a righteous case even if the results are not guaranteed?
And what do you think about the priest that was accused of the murder? should the priest betray a confessor and violate the sacred sacramental seal of confession to save himself?
In real life many priests have died because they would not break the seal of Confession
St.John of Nepomuk choose to be drowned rather then betray that trust.
John of Nepomuk - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was a long shot - and he disobeyed.
Hollyweird as i said - creates this because it causes confusion.
I doubt something would happen like that... for one thing.
Secondly, no you cannot break the seal of confession.