For the benefit of Unclemonkey

[the_gloaming]

Evolution is anti-science. It opposes the observational evidence. Is this the way my request for empirical support of goo to you evolution going to be treated in this forum? Ignore it and no one will notice that evolution doesn't have the proclaimed scientific support without which it is obviously religious dogma in the guise of science.

I didn't want to go off on a complete tangent on the original thread. So....

If you were shown the overwhelming evidence of human common ancestry with chimps and other apes, would that be enough "empirical support of goo to you evolution" ? Or do you require evidence of every single step from the first organism to humans ?

 

[Nathan Poe]

I'd settle for his giving "empirical evidence" of an evolution alternative.

 

[michabo]

Sounds like someone wishes to overthrow geology, archeology, foresic science, and cosmology, any science where you can't observe everything happen in the lab.

 

[Infinity]

.