• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

For me, it's either theistic evolution or nothing.

abysmul

Board Game Hobbyist
Jun 17, 2008
4,498
845
Almost Heaven
✟67,990.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
For me, it's either theistic evolution or nothing.


For me, it's "God did it", after that my opinion on exactly how doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things. None of us with an opinion on the matter were there to witness the event. We have our scripture, and science to help us form an opinion... that's about it.
 
Reactions: roasthawg
Upvote 0

Willtor

Not just any Willtor... The Mighty Willtor
Apr 23, 2005
9,713
1,429
44
Cambridge
Visit site
✟39,787.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
There is absolutely no proof whatsoever of evolution.

"Proof" is a slippery term.

The point regarding evolution is that it is just about as well supported a theory as exists in science. There is shockingly overwhelming evidence for it. And if you have programming and algorithm skills, you can verify quite a lot of that evidence for yourself without leaving your living room.
 
Reactions: Ada Lovelace
Upvote 0

Messy

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2011
10,027
2,082
Holland
✟21,082.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

I don't believe theistic evolution, but who cares if someone's brain can't accept YEC or GAP.
 
Upvote 0

random person

1 COR. 10:11; HEB. 1:2; HEB. 9:26,28; 1 PET. 1:20
Dec 10, 2013
3,646
262
Riverside California
✟21,587.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Once the believer realizes that the creation account and the flood are stories not scientific articles of faith.

What did this ancient writer(s) of these two pieces of Genesis, know about biology, know about astronomy, know about geology, etc?

So this writer(s) say if they were literally resurrected today, should they immediately enter our academia and reteach us all? Educate us all?

They could teach us the distance of the stars and how fast star light moves?
 
Upvote 0

roasthawg

Newbie
Dec 4, 2014
22
5
✟22,672.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Great post. Ours is a faith based religion. The world is at odds with Christianity, always will be. The devil uses many devices to try to weaken faith... Science has definitely been a great weapon of his for quite awhile now. That said, if a Christian believes in a very literal creation and is drawn into conversion about it I don't believe they need to hold back in expressing their views at all. The Bible is not mistaken in anything it says. Whether or not the creation account is an allegory will be up for debate until Jesus returns I imagine but that won't keep those chosen from coming to Christ.

"No one can come to me unless the father who sent me draws him."
 
Upvote 0

Hoghead1

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2015
4,911
741
78
✟8,968.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Can't say as I agree, Roasthawg. First of all, science is not some weapon of the Devil here. To start with, science is not at all equipped to deal with questions of God. Scientific discoveries are actually neutral on this question. Evolution per se is entirely mute on whether there is or is not a God. Many Christians believe in evolution. I, for one, believe evolution would have been impossible without God. When the Bible enters the picture, the issue is how exactly you want to interpret the biblical geophysics. From the 16thecentury on, science debunked the biblical cosmology, with its flat earth and geocentric view. Yet, that did not stop Christians from honoring the Bible or believing in God. Calvin, in his commentary in Genesis, stressed that God did not intend to give us an astronomy lesson, for example. If you examine the Sitz and Leben of the biblical world, that makes sense. Divinely inspired as it may be, the Bible is the product of a semi-barbaric, prescientific culture. Under those circumstances it would be ridiculous to assume the biblical writers had any knowledge of advanced scientific truth. Also, God is like a careful carpenter. God works with the grain, not over and against it. God can move only as fast as we are ready and able. Hence, God was not about to reveal scientific truths to the writers, anymore than God would have been willing to give Columbus a nuclear sub.
Much comes down to how you want to interpret Scripture. Everyone views Scripture through some sort of lens. With many, especially the laity, the lens is that provided by the teachings of their church, which they generally assume to be without question. They go to the Bible, then, with the idea firmly fixed in their heads that it is inerrant. The way things happened is exactly the way the Bible says they did. Nothing else will do or even be considered. From the standpoint of modern biblical studies, however, that is about the worst thing you can do. You should come to Scripture, with an open with. You should come with the lens provided by a healthy skepticism about traditional teachings. Maybe Genesis is accurate, maybe not. Maybe the Bible is inerrant, maybe not. Let's do some thorough research and then base our conclusions on that.
 
Upvote 0

roasthawg

Newbie
Dec 4, 2014
22
5
✟22,672.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Science in and of itself is fine. God surely gave us intuitive minds for a reason. But believing in something at the expense of God's word is a snare... And I doubt you'd disagree that when it comes to science vs the word many have fallen into this snare. So science is not bad in the same way many of the other weapons in the devil's arsenal are not bad. But any idol in place of the Lord is where the problem lies... And science surely is an idol above the Lord for many. What those who choose science over the word fail to realize is that "those who think they know something do not yet know as they ought to know."

For those of you who wholeheartedly love the Lord and trust in his word and enjoy science as a means to understanding, in part, the Lord's amazing creation I say more power to you. But as with anything keep your guard up lest you think you know something you don't.
 
Upvote 0

Merlin

Paradigm Buster
Sep 29, 2005
3,873
845
Avalon Island
✟24,937.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
Personally I reject evolution without regard to the bible.
Consider, for instance, the muscles for the fingers.
To give us good grip strength the muscles are very big.
They will not fit in the fingers, so, somehow they mutated themselves into the arms.
Then, there are strings attached to the fingertips and go back to the arm muscles.
I just cannot accept somehow we mutated in such a way (10x, once for each finger)
That a string mutated somehow for each finger, snaked its way up the finger, across the hand, through the wrist, and attached itself to a muscle in the arm.
It just seems too fantastic for me to believe.
And there are many more examples.
 
Reactions: JacksBratt
Upvote 0

Hoghead1

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2015
4,911
741
78
✟8,968.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I'm not sure you quite grasped my point, Rosathawg. it is not a matter of science pitted against the Word. My Old OT professor liked to shake up everyone, all the juniors, first-year seminarians, first day of OT class, by bodily walking into class and dramatically flinging the Bible in the wastebasket and saying in a loud voice, "The Bible is not the Word of God. The Bible is the Word of Man. The Word of God is contained in the Word of Man." That is my view. We must not make an idol out of the Bible, fall into bibliolatry. Actually, the Bible never refers to itself and the Word of God, as that title is reserved exclusively for Christ, period. So, as I tried to indicate in my previous post, I do not accept the Bible as some inerrant repository of truth or some kind of answer book for every and any problem. Again, I think that is bibliolatry. Hence, I think it is an abuse of Scripture to pit it against science.
 
Upvote 0

Papias

Listening to TW4
Dec 22, 2005
3,967
988
59
✟64,806.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married


So do you say this when people talk about the earth being a sphere, or germs causing disease? What about that infernal theory of gravity? Is that a potential snare?

In Christ-

Papias
 
Reactions: Jipsah
Upvote 0

roasthawg

Newbie
Dec 4, 2014
22
5
✟22,672.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok, I did miss your point. We have differing views on the Bible then... I believe in its inerrancy.
 
Reactions: JacksBratt
Upvote 0

roasthawg

Newbie
Dec 4, 2014
22
5
✟22,672.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So do you say this when people talk about the earth being a sphere, or germs causing disease? What about that infernal theory of gravity? Is that a potential snare?

In Christ-

Papias
It goes back to the verse I quoted... "Those who think they know something do not yet know as they ought to know.". Whether you believe the earth is round, flat, or a triangle really makes no difference. We know things in part now we are told. Based on that my advise is to take all knowledge with a grain of salt and invest your time and energy into grasping the word of God instead. Pray earnestly that you might be given the knowledge you need to live a useful life to the Lord. Anything else is worthless at best and a possible snare at worst.
 
Upvote 0

Hoghead1

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2015
4,911
741
78
✟8,968.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I gather you are saying, Roasthawg, that the Bible should take precedence over our experience, right? If so, sorry, I don't go for that at all. I don't think any book, Bible or otherwise, is really a substitute for direct, immediate experience. Books are of course vitally important and helpful, but I the end, its your experience that counts. Also, I feel studying history is important. Don't get me wrong. But it is also important to focus in on today. If you are going to try and go exclusively on Scripture , then your faith because a static, backward-looking affair.
 
Reactions: jamiec
Upvote 0

roasthawg

Newbie
Dec 4, 2014
22
5
✟22,672.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I view the bible as the word of God so that's where I'm encouraging faith to be placed. And it's not so much our experience rather than our intellect that I feel we should guard against. We all struggle with doubt but in the end I have faith that when the resurrection comes and we know in full what we know now in part God's word will be vindicated.

The exact mechanics of these things are what we obsess on and that is where our present views and understanding of science can cause us to stray. Creation, the sun standing still for Joshua, Jesus's ascension into heaven, etc. U don't know the mechanics behind any of these events. I'm curious as to the explanations others come up with and I think about them myself yet in the end it
I believe it comes down to us knowing now only in part rather than in full. We will get our answers but in the meantime we must rely on faith. That is how things are... So pray for faith is the route to take imo.
 
Upvote 0

Hoghead1

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2015
4,911
741
78
✟8,968.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Be careful here, Roasthawg. You havve no idea what I do or do not know. I am very familiar with classical theism or the classical Christian model of God, for example. Although you may no realize it, many Christians and most laity view Scripture through the lens of classical theism.
 
Reactions: jamiec
Upvote 0

Not_By_Chance

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 25, 2015
813
176
71
✟84,806.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
That's nothing compared with the working of the eyes, living cells and the brain (watch one of Professor David Mentons lectures on the eye and you'll get a tiny idea of what I mean). To me it makes no sense at all that all this organised itself and makes much more sense that God made everything with His infinite power and wisdom. Our most complex systems are nothing compared to those of the creator and neither is our knowledge.
 
Reactions: JacksBratt
Upvote 0