• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

For asylum, whites need not apply: The Left

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
183,345
66,643
Woods
✟5,980,292.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It looks like your liberal neighbors will have to take down their “refugees welcome” signs now.

A small group of South African refugees arrived in the United States on Monday bearing American flags.

They came to the U.S. after President Donald Trump signed an executive order in February designating them as in need of asylum.

One would think the Left would be happy about this. After all, Democrats are allegedly the party of refugees. All are welcome, right? Wrong.

Left-wing media commentators and Democrat politicians are apoplectic.

Continued below.
 
  • Prayers
Reactions: Vambram

PloverWing

Episcopalian
May 5, 2012
5,228
6,220
New Jersey
✟409,914.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
It's not that the South Africans aren't welcome. It's that they shouldn't get preferential treatment over other refugees. From the Episcopal Presiding Bishop's letter:

Since January, the previously bipartisan U.S. Refugee Admissions Program in which we participate has essentially shut down. Virtually no new refugees have arrived, hundreds of staff in resettlement agencies around the country have been laid off, and funding for resettling refugees who have already arrived has been uncertain. Then, just over two weeks ago, the federal government informed Episcopal Migration Ministries that under the terms of our federal grant, we are expected to resettle white Afrikaners from South Africa whom the U.S. government has classified as refugees.

...

It has been painful to watch one group of refugees, selected in a highly unusual manner, receive preferential treatment over many others who have been waiting in refugee camps or dangerous conditions for years.

Source: Letter from Presiding Bishop Sean Rowe on Episcopal Migration Ministries
 
  • Like
Reactions: john23237
Upvote 0

Lukaris

Orthodox Christian
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2007
8,905
3,253
Pennsylvania, USA
✟959,145.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
I believe many of these people are farmers and we need farmers in this nation. There is a pragmatic aspect to this.


 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
9,065
4,768
✟360,169.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
It's not that the South Africans aren't welcome. It's that they shouldn't get preferential treatment over other refugees. From the Episcopal Presiding Bishop's letter:



Source: Letter from Presiding Bishop Sean Rowe on Episcopal Migration Ministries
I do not believe the Episcopalian Church would care about certain groups getting pushed to the front of the line. If this were a bunch of Palestinian Muslims your church would be more than happy to help them migrate.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: lismore
Upvote 0

Tuur

Well-Known Member
Oct 12, 2022
2,681
1,429
Southeast
✟91,902.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If the Episcopalians would rather not take the grant money than to help settle Afrikaners, that's their business. No one requires them to do so; no one requires them to give a reason. Just as no one requires individual Episcopalians to remain Episcopalians. If individual Episcopalians are fine with their church's actions, so be it. If not, there's no reason to remain. There are already break-away Episcopal churches, and those are an option, just as moving to another denomination entirely is an option.
 
Upvote 0

Yarddog

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2008
17,009
4,311
Louisville, Ky
✟1,029,353.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
It looks like your liberal neighbors will have to take down their “refugees welcome” signs now.

A small group of South African refugees arrived in the United States on Monday bearing American flags.

They came to the U.S. after President Donald Trump signed an executive order in February designating them as in need of asylum.

One would think the Left would be happy about this. After all, Democrats are allegedly the party of refugees. All are welcome, right? Wrong.

Left-wing media commentators and Democrat politicians are apoplectic.

Continued below.
The article is incorrect and just right wing propaganda. Democrats would welcome these people if they were truly being terrorized in their country. Trump has been spouting lies about what has been happening.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: john23237
Upvote 0

rebornfree

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
May 5, 2007
8,686
14,470
NW England
✟941,754.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Divorced
Yes, we don't take kindly to a rich, egotistical, wannabe monarch hurting people to stroke his ego and pad his bank account. If that's a problem, I am happy to be a problem.
"Wannabe monarch"! In an absolute monarchy maybe. In a constitutional monarchy, such as the UK, he'd lose all his power.

Charles III, and I suspect other monarchs in democracies, really just 'rubber stamp' what their parliaments approve. After all, how can one person have absolute power in a democracy? Also, they have to be polite, not express their own opinions (except perhaps on 'good causes'), treat everyone equally and adhere to their Parliaments' agenda without political bias. I'm not sure that Trump would like that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: sanderabeer
Upvote 0