Fnly, they killed String Theory!

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

I'm not suggesting changing the science of what is observable. I'm suggesting the origin of what is observed is beyond the reach of science.

Sure, you can make up whatever story you like to explain how it all got here - but unless the story has some firm basis in what we already know, or you have some way to test it, it's just mythologising.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

If is written Voynich Manuscript and the author is dead, so he can not explain. One still can not say, that it is nonsense. Any nonsense must be proven nonsense. Until the opening discovery, it is a mystery.

No, what you posted was nonsense.

 

[joinfree]

No, what you posted was nonsense.

Atheists say, that nothing exists (because from nothing only nothing comes), but atheists do not say, that nonsense does not exist.

 

[TerryWoodenpic]

I wonder what they will do when they discover the interface between energy and spirit (I predict the mass suicide of scientists. )

why would they do that..? It would just be more things to investigate.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

Atheists say, that nothing exists (because from nothing only nothing comes), but atheists do not say, that nonsense does not exist.

Atheists don't believe in a god. That's all.

 

[joinfree]

Atheists don't believe in a god. That's all.

But you have the idol. Idol is not God.

 

[Jimmy D]

I know even less about String Theory than I do about raising armadillos. (I know enough to have characterised it as mental masturbation for mathematicians. [That's string theory, not armadillo husbandry]). But I did find this comment online:

Gravitational waves, in general, present no problem to string theory. It's specifically gravitational waves in the CMBR that present a problem because of the limit they would impose on the inflation field. See this paper:http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/9606387v1.pdf.

The comment was found here. I found that using this search {gravity wave string theory conflict} on DuckDuckGo, where there may be further informative links.

You can't explain it to me in simplistic terms in a short forum post? In that case String theory is obviously garbage, stop wasting my time.






Seriously though, thanks, I'll check out your links.

 

[Jimmy D]

"Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen (observed) were not made of things which do appear (which are observable)."

This is the only logical explanation for the origin of matter and energy.

What!? An tetchy old diety who gets angry when someone eats his fruit? Not convinced sorry.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

But you have the idol. Idol is not God.

What idol?

 

[joinfree]

What idol?

John is answering:
- I do not know Him, I can not disprove Him, but there is no Him. The Loving (etc) Trinity is Not Existent.
Bob:
- Here you get it: Non-existent Loving God. It is your idol now, a mental idol is defined as demolishes thoughts about God of Theism. But my Trinity is perfectly Existent. Moreover, the Existence and Reality is defined as His Creation.
John:
- prove then the Trinity.
Bob:

The war of Gods: idol of Atheists vs. God of Theists

 

[joinfree]

What!? An tetchy old diety who gets angry when someone eats his fruit? Not convinced sorry.

do not simplify the problem of death.

 

[Larniavc]

Is that good news or bad news for you?

Bad news for all scientists everywhere, more like.

This is proof, if proof be need be, that no scientist anywhere knows anything about anything, ever.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

The war of Gods: idol of Atheists vs. God of Theists

Lol! More nonsense.

 

[joinfree]

Lol! More nonsense.

If something makes no sense to you, is it necessarily wrong? Let us check, does the 500 pages long proof of Poincare Conjecture make sense to you or doesn't?

 

[DogmaHunter]

If we are so good in Science, why there are so many mysteries there? UFOes, Dark Matter, lack of antimatter in Big Bang?

I love how you mentioned "ufo's" in the same list as dark matter and big bang / antimatter.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

Sure, you can make up whatever story you like to explain how it all got here - but unless the story has some firm basis in what we already know, or you have some way to test it, it's just mythologising.

Supernatural creation is a common myth worldwide.

 

[OldWiseGuy]

why would they do that..? It would just be more things to investigate.

They would just add it to the pile of the many wacky theories they are now investigating.

 

[bhsmte]

"Then said I, Wisdom is better than strength: nevertheless the poor man's wisdom is despised, and his words are not heard." Ecclesiastes 9:16.

Scripture in a science forum, tends to fall flat.

 

[bhsmte]

Atheists say, that nothing exists (because from nothing only nothing comes), but atheists do not say, that nonsense does not exist.

Another strawman.

 

[ViaCrucis]

The String Theory or any other multi-dimension esoteric is totally disproven in 2018:
[1801.08160] Limits on the number of spacetime dimensions from GW170817

No? At least they have ruled out the esoteric terms: "let us enter parallel dimensions", "Big Foot is coming out parallel dimension."

Good, because I was tired of all the leading physicists saying that Sasquatch was invading earth through extra-dimensional portals. Everyone knows Sasquatch is a native to the Pacific Northwest, and lives on a diet of tree octopi.

-CryptoLutheran