Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You obviously can’t address my points so you cop out and deflect. Just repeating your claims means nothing. I addressed them & you can’t answer. End of.God created two lights, is all that is need. Just as simple as believe in Jesus for Eternal Life.
need a verse for each.
Then God made two great lights: the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. He made the stars also
Most assuredly, I say to you, he who believes in Me has everlasting life.
You do not make any point worth addressing, just repeated statements that you do not believe The Bibles creation account about the sun and moon
You obviously can’t address my points so you cop out and deflect. Just repeating your claims means nothing. I addressed them & you can’t answer. End of.
I understand your point (that Genesis cannot be used as a technical description of the process), however, Genesis says how, too:My point was that Genesis does not say how God created the world; only that he did.
You are right about one thing - there are really creation accounts (two, not just one) which are from different authors and partly inconsistent with each other. Some Genesis editor/s put them together, but they have, most probably, different origin.Believe what you want, just the way you do about The Bibles creation accounts.
No, learning requires you to pay attention and to reflect what is written in my posts, either with a proper argumentation or acceptance.
How can you "secretly know" the truth about firmament. Based on what experiment, what observation or on what math?This Psalm 19:1 is on Wernher von Braun (head of NASA) gravestone & I think he secretly knew the truth about the firmament & it was his subtle way of getting the truth across.
Not automatically. You should reason properly, though, and learn from solid, credible sources, not from youtube videos of various weirdos who have some mental problems, likely.So in other words I should accept what you say ?
Yes.I understand your point (that Genesis cannot be used as a technical description of the process), however, Genesis says how, too:
- by word
- from waters
- in six stages
- etc
Also, similarly, Genesis 2 says how God made a man - from dust, with breath - how God made a woman etc.
So, Genesis says how, its just not literal. Its obviously much more similar to a theatrical play with six scenes than to a science book.
Show me - and us - where the shape of the earth is stated in Genesis 1 and you will put an end to 2,400 posts and many pages of arguments.-Sure it does, it pits what science states is reality to what The Bible states is reality about God's creation.
You should reason properly, though, and learn from solid, credible sources
The ancients had advanced technological knowledge and capabilities which Tesla
uncovered once again.
The moon landings were very clearly staged as anyone that watches the remnants we have of the original
Apollo footage or looks at any of Nasa’s photos with with a keen eye can discern.
But God has not given us scientific details of HOW his world/universe works.Which I do - God
Perhaps you will understand the NIV better:King James Bible
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
What are these invisible things ? Is it;
1. The Aether
2. The Demons
3. The Angels
4. The Firmament
5. The Heavens
6. The Air
7. DNA
8. Our Senses
9. The Foundations Of The Earth
I reckon it is the Aether
(PDF) Dynamic Theory of the Aether [DRAFT] - Unifying
Show me - and us - where the shape of the earth is stated in Genesis 1 and you will put an end to 2,400 posts and many pages of arguments.
You are still making the error of thinking that Genesis was dictated by God in a literal manner. It was written by ancient Hebrews and the genre is mythological.Then God said, “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.” Thus God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament; and it was so.
The language of divided/separated (badal) shows God is speaking about His creation as a flat plane. When something is divided, it is language that would be used of a plane, the waters were divided.
You are still making the error of thinking that Genesis was dictated by God in a literal manner. It was written by ancient Hebrews and the genre is mythological.
The flat earth idea behind Genesis 1 is not of God, but of those Hebrews. It was a common concept in the bronze-age Mesopotamia. Therefore, all your work is not defending God (or whatever you think you are doing here), but defending the bronze-age human concepts.
When you repeat bronze-age ideas, I will repeat those are bronze-age ideas. Easy as a pie.You have long ago lost any credibility, with me, so why keep repeating your misunderstanding of The Bible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?