Well here's another sweeping claim, man has never been or walked on the moon. Amen
Nothing like calling Christians liars.Well here's another sweeping claim, man has never been or walked on the moon. Amen
we know this, but there are the gullible masses to consider.No, there is no possibility that might happen.
There is no proof or aliens, or other life anywhere.
Nothing like calling Christians liars.
But you're still publicly calling them a liar.Well I'm sorry but if Christians believe all this hog wash, I feel for them & will pray for them to come out of their strong delusion.
But you're still publicly calling them a liar.
Well here's another sweeping claim, man has never been or walked on the moon. Amen
You're calling the Christians that state they've walked on the moon liars.No - I'm calling NASA liars.
You're calling the Christians that state they've walked on the moon liars.
They say they walked on the moon, you say they didn't.No - I'm not, I'm saying they are delusional for believing this.
They say they walked on the moon, you say they didn't.
They are delusional for believing THEY walked on the moon?No - I'm not, I'm saying they are delusional for believing this.
I just don't think the creation account is making any claim about it being flat or sphere-like. I'm convinced that the description given is not clear enough for us to know either way. I mean if you're pointing out that the firmament must be a solid dome couldn't that work either way? whatever shape it is, on a flat earth or sphere-like.
No one demands it of creation. We accept it for the poetic description that it is.
And you've now chosen to ignore someone who's calling you out on it.
I do not know how many times i have been told on this forum The Bible is not science book.
For me that is an easy to believe in The Bible/s creation account, i like the narrow road or the road less traveled.
My view is that I'm mostly persuaded of the young earth creation (YEC) view but recently I've heard some teaching by Dr. Michael Heiser that I've not heard before until recently. I had no idea that some conservative scholars who are not out to disprove the infallibility of scripture nevertheless hold to a view that's described as non concordist. It's the idea that ancient near eastern (ANE) culture used the best language they knew at the time to describe cosmology and the best they could do with the limited knowledge was to describe a flat earth model. Yet he would tell you the point is not to say God did something wrong in allowing this view which is believed to be false into the text. The point he would make in one of his lectures is that it's not making a scientific observation, but the point is to show all the other nations it was their God that created all things not the false gods the other nations worshiped and he did not need help from lesser gods as the other cultures would claim in their creation accounts.-The creation account is more than just being a flat earth (which The Bible never outright states God created a flat earth).
The account science gives as scientific fact. Nothing from science agrees with The Bible, nothing.
The Bible plainly states God created two great light (sun and moon) i believe this. That the sun and moon are created lights giving off their own light. There is not a single verse giving any indication the moon reflects the suns light.
It is also plainly stated these lights are placed in the raqia (dome, expanse, sky) by God to give light on the earth. No mention of God placing these light out in an outer space thousands to millions to billions of mile/light years away from the earth.
There is absolutely no way to get from The Bible that planets orbit the sun and the sun lights up these planets and moons orbiting the sun.
I can go on and on The Bible creation accounts and creation description are given in The Bible. So you can either believe them or not, if not i guess science is your choice. But these accounts are not compatible, one is a lie and the other is the truth. For me that is an easy to believe in The Bible/s creation account, i like the narrow road or the road less traveled.
Reminder: the Christians who believe in a flat Earth are an itsy bitsy teeny tiny percentage of Christians. The percentage, in fact, rounds out to zero. You're going to have to pray for more than two billion people.Well I'm sorry but if Christians believe all this hog wash, I feel for them & will pray for them to come out of their strong delusion.
These guys use the same kind of arguments against evolution as they do against the globe earth. Quotes from the Bible aren't going to convince atheists, so it requires a bit more in depth knowledge of biology to argue against evolution, whereas flat earth is trivial to debunk.However, I don't know why more YEC believers side with you against theistic evolutionists.
Reminder: the Christians who believe in a flat Earth are an itsy bitsy teeny tiny percentage of Christians. The percentage, in fact, rounds out to zero. You're going to have to pray for more than two billion people.
So get prayin'. Ya got a lot of work to do.
Quotes from the Bible aren't going to convince atheists,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?