Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Fish finger fossils show the beginnings of hands
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Qwertyui0p" data-source="post: 74849640" data-attributes="member: 424867"><p>I don't agree that God uses evolution, because that would go against his nature.</p><p>“The problem that biological evolution poses for natural theologians is the sort of God that a Darwinian version of evolution implies … The evolutionary process is rife with happenstance, contingency, incredible waste, death, pain and horror … Whatever the God implied by evolutionary theory and the data of natural history may be like, He is not the Protestant God of waste not, want not. He is also not a loving God who cares about His productions. He is not even the awful God portrayed in the book of Job. The God of the Galápagos is careless, wasteful, indifferent, almost diabolical. He is certainly not the sort of God to whom anyone would be inclined to pray.”</p><p></p><p>—David Hull, The God of the Galápagos, <em>Nature</em> <strong>352</strong>:485–86, 8 August 1991.</p><p></p><p>And also because the Bible says differently <a href="https://creation.com/genesis-according-to-evolution" target="_blank">Genesis according to evolution - creation.com</a></p><p>And also because there're scientific problems with evolution. <a href="https://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j16_2/j16_2_118-127.pdf" target="_blank">https://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j16_2/j16_2_118-127.pdf</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Qwertyui0p, post: 74849640, member: 424867"] I don't agree that God uses evolution, because that would go against his nature. “The problem that biological evolution poses for natural theologians is the sort of God that a Darwinian version of evolution implies … The evolutionary process is rife with happenstance, contingency, incredible waste, death, pain and horror … Whatever the God implied by evolutionary theory and the data of natural history may be like, He is not the Protestant God of waste not, want not. He is also not a loving God who cares about His productions. He is not even the awful God portrayed in the book of Job. The God of the Galápagos is careless, wasteful, indifferent, almost diabolical. He is certainly not the sort of God to whom anyone would be inclined to pray.” —David Hull, The God of the Galápagos, [I]Nature[/I] [B]352[/B]:485–86, 8 August 1991. And also because the Bible says differently [URL='https://creation.com/genesis-according-to-evolution']Genesis according to evolution - creation.com[/URL] And also because there're scientific problems with evolution. [URL]https://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j16_2/j16_2_118-127.pdf[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Fish finger fossils show the beginnings of hands
Top
Bottom