Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Fish finger fossils show the beginnings of hands
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Subduction Zone" data-source="post: 74818457" data-attributes="member: 321072"><p>But you are back to the realm of abiogenesis. That is moving the goalposts. Now I could correct some of the errors that you made in even this short little post. Once again, evolution deals with life after abiogenesis. </p><p></p><p>You are not lying, your lack of knowledge is what makes you unable to see how you moved the goalposts. </p><p></p><p>But here is a freebie. RNA was probably first, in fact almost certainly first. It can form on its own and self replicate. After that genes would have probably have been the next step and lastly DNA. DNA is not needed for genes even today. There are viruses that are RNA based, not DNA based.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Subduction Zone, post: 74818457, member: 321072"] But you are back to the realm of abiogenesis. That is moving the goalposts. Now I could correct some of the errors that you made in even this short little post. Once again, evolution deals with life after abiogenesis. You are not lying, your lack of knowledge is what makes you unable to see how you moved the goalposts. But here is a freebie. RNA was probably first, in fact almost certainly first. It can form on its own and self replicate. After that genes would have probably have been the next step and lastly DNA. DNA is not needed for genes even today. There are viruses that are RNA based, not DNA based. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Fish finger fossils show the beginnings of hands
Top
Bottom