Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Your excessive sensitivity betrays you.
Why would any chemical want to self replicate?
That would go against entropy and the trend toward disorganization.
Researchers have discovered the fossil of a fish with finger-like digits in its fin that lived 380 million years ago, according to a new study. And they believe it bridges the evolutionary gap between marine and land vertebrates as one of the oldest examples of a skeletal pattern resembling a hand.
Why are you so sensitive to this? Why not try to learn why creationists are wrong?Oh..."THEM" again.
No need for a "want". You should simply ask "why". The answer may be the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Life raises the general rate of entropy. It lowers energy available for work.Why would any chemical want to self replicate?
That would go against entropy and the trend toward disorganization.
Many Christians accept evolution. One does not have to believe the Adam and Eve story to be a Christian.I believe in Jesus. He bridges a big gap as well.
Still you are overly sensitive when it comes to this topic. It is not that hard to learn the basics. Why not start there?Most people have noticed I'm not a creation scientist.
Or they can with the forums search function.
It has no desires. It follows the laws of chemistry.
So does the formation of a snowflake, but it doesn't violate the law of entropy.
Because it dissipates and gives up heat, drops in energy, crystallizes
and becomes brittle and useless. This increases entropy. It also gives up movement and adaptability, both features of life.
No, it most certainly did not come from evolution. Evolution is the description of how life develops from generation to generation. Life from non-life is a different field with different factors.According to the so-called fact of evolution, it must have evolved otherwise did it just come spontaneously from nothing?
Because it dissipates and gives up heat, drops in energy, crystallizes and becomes brittle and useless. This increases entropy.
So it strikes out as the start of life.
Evolutionist Lynn Margulis (1938–2011), a famous University of Massachusetts biology professor and theThis is just factually incorrect, and I'm pretty sure I've given you examples to the contrary in prior discussions. Heck, I even recently posted how evolution is used in understanding the origins of the current coronavirus.
However, it seems all creationists have left these days is just denialism.
Oh well. Ce la vie.
Writer George V. Caylor interviewed Sam, a molecular biologist. George asked Sam about his work. Sam said he and his team were scientific detectives, working with DNA and tracking down the cause of disease. Here is their published conversation.Evolution is both. It's a fact that evolution occurs in populations of biological organisms. The theory is the explanation for how it occurs.
Many Christians accept evolution. One does not have to believe the Adam and Eve story to be a Christian.
When you have no viable argument, then attack an imaginary enemy
to try an make them look weaker than you.
Writer George V. Caylor interviewed Sam, a molecular biologist
And many creationists adopt that position as a rhetorical strategy, even knowing that it isn't true.Many creationists seem to think that evolution means that the universe and everything in it came from nothing, and that God doesn't exist.
I used to be an active YE Creationist. Been there done that.Still you are overly sensitive when it comes to this topic. It is not that hard to learn the basics. Why not start there?
I know enough to know that evolution is a con. For start, evolutionists found way too many flaws in the theory- including Darwin. So some genius decided to change the ground rules. So "adaptation" which was taught as scientific fact when I went to school, became "evolution". Garbage. Adaptation happens in very short time frames. Evolution supposedly takes billions of years. Adaptation is within species.
Evolution depends on life being present. No life, no evolution. You don't find rocks evolving. Now God has told humanity how life came about. He created it. Evolution is mankind's attempt to shove God out of the picture. There is nothing new about this. Just the methods have changed. Evolved if you like. Every argument in favour of evolution has been argued against by people just as educated and intelligent as evolutionists. The scientific community is bullied, bribed and blackmailed into silence. So relatively few will put their hand up and say that they reject evolution. But there are enough. I rarely see anyone argue the facts that anti evolutionists raise. It is usually an attack on the doubter. His credentials, intelligence, and sometimes his character. If the individual happens to be a believer, that is instant dismissal.
If evolution is so beyond doubt, what is there to fear? And who cares? It is of zero benefit to mankind. There are genetic researchers who utterly reject evolution doing just as valuable work as evolutionists.
I prefer to keep things simple. As Einstein said, as simple as possible but no simpler. God says that He created. That's good enough for me.They only reject the "randomness" argument. If you consider God is smart enough to make plans, then evolution works far better as a model.
Since nothing is random, it makes far more sense that mistakes are so rare.
Sam who is afraid to give his last name because it would end his career.So why are you doing that then?
Sam who?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?