First real image of a black hole

[Michael]

Still not "fillaments. And still not anywhere close to your non-scientific beliefs. You are also mixing photographs. Why use such a misleading tactic?

There's nothing misleading about it.

That's the quintessential example of a current carrying plasma filament, and it's specifically predicted by Alfven's homopolar generator model of objects inside of a plasma universe.

You'll find that current carrying filaments scale quite nicely, from the small current carrying filaments that form inside of an ordinary plasma ball, to the massive current carrying filaments that wire the universe together. That particular filament is somewhere in the middle in terms of current flow.

In an effort to deny the electrical aspects of space, and the current flow aspect of "Birkeland currents" in space, the mainstream erroneously calls them everything *except* their proper scientific term. They euphemistically use phrases like "space slinky" or "jets", or "magnetic ropes", "filaments", and even "STEVE". What they absolutely refuse to call them are their proper scientific name, "Birkeland currents", lest they are forced to acknowledge the actual current that causes them to exist, and the electrical nature of the universe itself.

The whole field of Geospace Science already understands the electrical nature of space:

Electric Currents in Outer Space Run the Show - Eos

Astronomers are still playing catch up.

 

[Subduction Zone]

There's nothing misleading about it.

That's the quintessential example of a current carrying plasma filament, and it's specifically predicted by Alfven's homopolar generator model of objects inside of a plasma universe.

You'll find that current carrying filaments scale quite nicely, from the small current carrying filaments that form inside of an ordinary plasma ball, to the massive current carrying filaments that wire the universe together. That particular filament is somewhere in the middle in terms of current flow.

In an effort to deny the electrical aspects of space, and the current flow aspect of "Birkeland currents" in space, the mainstream erroneously calls them everything *except* their proper scientific term. They euphemistically use phrases like "space slinky" or "jets", or "magnetic ropes", "filaments", and even "STEVE". What they absolutely refuse to call them are their proper scientific name, "Birkeland currents", lest they are forced to acknowledge the actual current that causes them to exist, and the electrical nature of the universe itself.

The whole field of Geospace Science already understands the electrical nature of space:

Electric Currents in Outer Space Run the Show - Eos

Astronomers are still playing catch up.

Your desperate grasping at the thinnest of straws is quite sad. An image is posted that is nowhere near to what is posted by someone that posted some EU nonsense and yet you can't admit it. Your beliefs are weaker than those of the worst of creationists at times.

 

[Michael]

Your desperate grasping at the thinnest of straws is quite sad. An image is posted that is nowhere near to what is posted by someone that posted some EU nonsense and yet you can't admit it. Your beliefs are weaker than those of the worst of creationists at times.

LOL! From my perspective you're the one grasping at straws and your irrational attempt to associate me with creationism is a really pitiful debate tactic.

Even when you can see the current carrying filament with your own eyes, you still refuse to believe that it exists? Talk about a weak position.

FYI, the mainstream model also assumes that those massive jets are composed of moving charged particles, AKA current and they have already been shown to carry a *huge* amount of current.

Universe's highest electric current found
Measurement of the Electric Current in a Kpc-Scale Jet

 

[Subduction Zone]

LOL! From my perspective you're the one grasping at straws and your irrational attempt to associate me with creationism is a really pitiful debate tactic.

Even when you can see the current carrying filament with your own eyes, you still refuse to believe that it exists? Talk about a weak position.

FYI, the mainstream model also assumes that those massive jets are composed of moving charged particles, AKA current and they have already been shown to carry a *huge* amount of current.

Universe's highest electric current found
Measurement of the Electric Current in a Kpc-Scale Jet

That is because you have nothing but misinterpretation at best. Try again.

 

[Michael]

That is because you have nothing but misinterpretation at best. Try again.

Explain to us how I "misinterpreted" this paper:

Measurement of the Electric Current in a Kpc-Scale Jet
Universe's highest electric current found

 

[Subduction Zone]

Explain to us how I "misinterpreted" this paper:

Measurement of the Electric Current in a Kpc-Scale Jet
Universe's highest electric current found

You lost the ability to make demands a long time ago. Now I merely humor you now and then.

 

[Michael]

You lost the ability to make demands a long time ago. Now I merely humor you now and then.

Translation: You can't handle the paper at all, nor it's findings, so you simply ignore it. Those aren't current-less "jets", those "jets" carry *massive currents* that are flowing through the plasma.

We basically see massive currents at the largest scales just as Geospace science predicts.

Electric Currents in Outer Space Run the Show - Eos

 

[Subduction Zone]

Translation: You can't handle the paper at all, nor it's findings, so you simply ignore it. Those aren't current-less "jets", those "jets" carry *massive currents* that are flowing through the plasma.

We basically see massive currents at the largest scales just as Geospace science predicts.

Electric Currents in Outer Space Run the Show - Eos

No, I find you tiresome. If you were willing to learn from your errors @essentialsaltes would have convinced you a long time ago.

 

[Michael]

No, I find you tiresome. If you were willing to learn from your errors @essentialsaltes would have convinced you a long time ago.

Which errors? You're just handwaving at this point.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Which errors? You're just handwaving at this point.

Nope, your errors have been pointed out to you time after time after time by countless posters here. People whose beliefs are a house of cards cannot afford to admit to even one error. You earlier made an error with the "filaments" claim. One that you cannot support and can only wave your hands in explanation. You really should not accuse other of waving their hands.

 

[Michael]

Nope, your errors have been pointed out to you time after time after time by countless posters here. People whose beliefs are a house of cards cannot afford to admit to even one error.

I didn't make any errors with respect to Birkeland's solar model, and it works reliably and predictably in the lab, unlike anything based on mainstream models. You can't logically claim that a working model is an 'error'.

You earlier made an error with the "filaments" claim. One that you cannot support and can only wave your hands in explanation. You really should not accuse other of waving their hands.

Which filament error?

 

[Smithi]

I didn't make any errors with respect to Birkeland's solar model,

There is no such model.

 

[RDKirk]

Very cool!

Haters gonna say it's fake.

In a way it is faked, because it's an interpretation of data to create a visual appearance where there is no actual visual appearance.

The data is real, but the appearance is not.

 

[GoldenBoy89]

In a way it is faked, because it's an interpretation of data to create a visual appearance where there is no actual visual appearance.

The data is real, but the appearance is not.

Hater!!!

Jk.

 

[Ttalkkugjil]

View attachment 254398
This is what a black hole looks like.

Look at that. There it is, in its less-than-6,000-year-old glory.

 

[Brightmoon]

Look at that. There it is, in its less-than-6,000-year-old glory.

Ummmm , no.