- Dec 17, 2006
- 27,285
- 4,084
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Peace be to you in Christ
I had just posted a shorter version of this at CARM (adding a little more into it for here)
But one of my questions (in respects to the two witnesses) was concerning what the fire is that is being shown proceeding out of the mouth of the two in Rev 11:5?
Would they be like human blow torches? Could they open their mouths and instantly become walking a human flame throwers?
That type thing.
Also, wouldnt their lips get burnt?
(Okay, just teasin' wit chu)
I'll be serious.
What if it can be shown elsewhere in scripture to be speaking after a different manner of fire?
I lean to the latter but usually some animosity will start between the two perspectives which is also understandable, that too is the outworking of a very biblical principal I believe.
But here for instance, God says this
Jerm 5:14 Wherefore thus saith the LORD God of hosts, Because ye speak this word, ((behold)) I will make my words in thy mouth fire, and this people wood, and it shall devour them.
And then here we see (of His two witnesses) this...
Rev 11:5 And if any man will hurt them, fire proceedeth out of their mouth, and devoureth their enemies: and if any man will hurt them, he must in this manner be killed.
So we have what can be comparable between the two
The word/ mouth/ fire/ men/ devoured/ and in this manner to be killed
Slain (meaning to be killed) here also
Hosea 6:5 Therefore have I hewed them by the prophets; I have slain them by the words of my mouth: and thy judgments are as the light that goeth forth.
So we have (in combination)
I have slain (killed) by the words of my mouth
And,
behold I will make my words in thy mouth fire, and this people wood, and it shall devour them.
And
if any man will hurt them, fire proceedeth out of their mouth, and devoureth their enemies:
And again,
if any man will hurt them, he must in this manner be killed.
It speaks there of "the manner" in which anyone who would "hurt them" must be killed
And then recall when the disciples said
Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did?
But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
So notice he says,
Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of
Wouldnt the spirit ye are of (in that thing) be reflective of this manner?
And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men
Those two look like a similar comparison
Because we have the disciples (when asking to the Lord if they should command fire to come down from heaven) Jesus pointed out that they really knew notthe manner of spirit they were of.
But where it speaks of the fire out of the mouth (of the two witnesses) it mentions there the manner in which those (who would seek to hurt them) were to be killed (but not the manner of spirit they are of).
Obviously these two belong to God.
So as I asked there is it considered out of the question that the words out of their mouths is that fire?
Since it can be shown elsewhere in scripture and speaks to "the manner" in which they would be killed (even by the fire out of the mouth) verses the other, "fire come down from heaven" (in the sight of men) which seems somewhat reflective of "the manner of" spirit that could be shown in the other comparisons?
Do you know what I mean jelly beans?
I figured I would post to ask this here (including a little more)
Our God richly bless you in Christ Jesus the Lord
I had just posted a shorter version of this at CARM (adding a little more into it for here)
But one of my questions (in respects to the two witnesses) was concerning what the fire is that is being shown proceeding out of the mouth of the two in Rev 11:5?
Would they be like human blow torches? Could they open their mouths and instantly become walking a human flame throwers?
That type thing.
Also, wouldnt their lips get burnt?
(Okay, just teasin' wit chu)
I'll be serious.
What if it can be shown elsewhere in scripture to be speaking after a different manner of fire?
I lean to the latter but usually some animosity will start between the two perspectives which is also understandable, that too is the outworking of a very biblical principal I believe.
But here for instance, God says this
Jerm 5:14 Wherefore thus saith the LORD God of hosts, Because ye speak this word, ((behold)) I will make my words in thy mouth fire, and this people wood, and it shall devour them.
And then here we see (of His two witnesses) this...
Rev 11:5 And if any man will hurt them, fire proceedeth out of their mouth, and devoureth their enemies: and if any man will hurt them, he must in this manner be killed.
So we have what can be comparable between the two
The word/ mouth/ fire/ men/ devoured/ and in this manner to be killed
Slain (meaning to be killed) here also
Hosea 6:5 Therefore have I hewed them by the prophets; I have slain them by the words of my mouth: and thy judgments are as the light that goeth forth.
So we have (in combination)
I have slain (killed) by the words of my mouth
And,
behold I will make my words in thy mouth fire, and this people wood, and it shall devour them.
And
if any man will hurt them, fire proceedeth out of their mouth, and devoureth their enemies:
And again,
if any man will hurt them, he must in this manner be killed.
It speaks there of "the manner" in which anyone who would "hurt them" must be killed
And then recall when the disciples said
Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did?
But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.
So notice he says,
Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of
Wouldnt the spirit ye are of (in that thing) be reflective of this manner?
And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men
Those two look like a similar comparison
Because we have the disciples (when asking to the Lord if they should command fire to come down from heaven) Jesus pointed out that they really knew notthe manner of spirit they were of.
But where it speaks of the fire out of the mouth (of the two witnesses) it mentions there the manner in which those (who would seek to hurt them) were to be killed (but not the manner of spirit they are of).
Obviously these two belong to God.
So as I asked there is it considered out of the question that the words out of their mouths is that fire?
Since it can be shown elsewhere in scripture and speaks to "the manner" in which they would be killed (even by the fire out of the mouth) verses the other, "fire come down from heaven" (in the sight of men) which seems somewhat reflective of "the manner of" spirit that could be shown in the other comparisons?
Do you know what I mean jelly beans?
I figured I would post to ask this here (including a little more)
Our God richly bless you in Christ Jesus the Lord