And we are back to your inability to distinguish between empirical and subjective evidence.
Not me, you, and I'll demonstrate it for you.
There is a difference between objective evidence used to build up empirical models, and subjective evidence. I can (in principle) check the redshift, measure it again, and reproduce the effects.
You can verify that "Yep, those photons are redshifted alright". That's all you can verify with a telescope.
You missed a step however. There is no cause/effect connection between photon redshift and any of the following 'claims' related to "cause".
"Space magically expanded"
"Inflation did it"
"Dark stuff does stuff to photons too"
I cannot do so for the reported testimonies.
Likewise I can't get a single astronomer to tell me where dark energy comes from so I can 'verify' their claims. I can't get them to tell me where to find any inflation or how to control it to see if has some effect on a photon. I can't verify that these things even exist in nature, let alone that they have some effect on a photon. All I have are the "testimonies" of a handful of old guys that think they see invisible stuff in the sky!
I am not ignoring them, I am pointing out that at best we cannot ascertain what is happening there, and distinguish between a genuine experience caused from the outside and an entirely psychological process.
Technically speaking, it's entirely possible for a living organism to control it's physical "self" down to a specific atom, which in this case could be *inside* my physical form for all I know. Already you've made an *assumption* that might not even be correct to begin with.
Now of course it *could be* an external EM field is used to affect us internally, but I can't even be *certain* of that from the start.
The whole point here however is that there is a 'natural' way to explain these experience via a *macroscopic* intelligence. If you accept the fact that humans can 'evolve', then you must also accept the possibility that a macroscopic intelligence can evolve and it's had more 'time' to evolve.
Of course, we know from the descriptions that these experiences are highly culturally colored, which would tentatively point toward a psycho-sociological explanation.
Jesus tends to transcend human cultures today. He has followers all over the planet, located in nearly every "culture" of the world. Why?
At levels much higher than occurring naturally. I did not state that EM fields cannot influence human thought. I stated that there is no evidence that they can at levels measured to occur naturally. Please respond to the claims I actually make, not the ones you dream up in your head.
I actually think it's dubious that you're requiring the EM field "communication process" to be created/initiated on the outside of the skull rather than resonating itself through atoms on the *inside*. Wireless communication has been a part of our technologies for a long time now.
I could not personally afford the experiments that would be required to 'empirically verify" that communication process, but at least it's physically *possible* with enough money.
I can't even "experiment" with dark energy and use real control mechanisms since nobody on Earth can name a source. You're imposing *greater* requirements on God than science imposes on it's "hypothetical entities".