Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What you think someone "suggested" does not alter the facts. The DOJ has been ordered to release the warrant and from everything I read the DOJ has not yet obeyed the order of the federal court.You're citing Christiana Bobb (formerly with OAN), the same lawyer who suggested the FBI planted evidence?
Does it say that in your article?But when they eventually let the attorney SEE the warrant they REFUSED to provide a copy
What you think someone "suggested" does not alter the facts. The DOJ has been ordered to release the warrant and from everything I read the DOJ has not yet obeyed the order of the federal court.
This clip from Attorney General Garland's press conference today will show that the warrant and an inventory of what was taken was indeed given at the time the warrant was executed (50 second mark). Also, the Justice Department has requested the court unseal the search warrant.the attorney asked to SEE a copy of the warrant. They initially would not let the attorney SEE the warrant. But when they eventually let the attorney SEE the warrant they REFUSED to provide a copy.
Thanks for posting this video. Excellent, now we know that the DOJ will be releasing the warrant and the inventory list and that Trump got copies right away.This clip from Attorney General Garland's press conference today will show that the warrant and an inventory of what was taken was indeed given at the time the warrant was executed (50 second mark). Also, the Justice Department has asked a court to unseal the search warrant.
It is now up to the Trump appointed judge.Thanks for posting this video. Excellent, now we know that the DOJ will be releasing the warrant and the inventory list and that Trump got copies right away.
Do you think Trump will try to beat the DOJ to the punch?
False. All he claimed was "on the day of search." As was reported, they first refused to let Trump's attorney even look at the warrant. Eventually, after some talk by the attorney, they let the attorney LOOK at the warrant but refused to provide a copy. People were outraged. We don't know when during the day a warrant was eventually provided. They should be prosecuted for not immediately providing the warrant. As I also reported, the judge ordered the DOJ to make the warrant public.This clip from Attorney General Garland's press conference today will show that the warrant and an inventory of what was taken was indeed given at the time the warrant was executed (50 second mark). Also, the Justice Department has requested the court unseal the search warrant.
False. As per my previous point we know no such thing.Thanks for posting this video. Excellent, now we know that the DOJ will be releasing the warrant and the inventory list and that Trump got copies right away.
Do you think Trump will try to beat the DOJ to the punch?
False. All he claimed was "on the day of search." As was reported, they first refused to let Trump's attorney even look at the warrant. Eventually, after some talk by the attorney, they let the attorney LOOK at the warrant but refused to provide a copy. People were outraged. We don't know when during the day a warrant was eventually provided. They should be prosecuted for not immediately providing the warrant. As I also reported, the judge ordered the DOJ to make the warrant public.
Read this post again: Federal Judge Orders DOJ to Provide Copy of Trump Raid WarrantFalse. All he claimed was "on the day of search." As was reported, they first refused to let Trump's attorney even look at the warrant.
Even Christina Bobb said she received a copy. Her recollection of events seems to bounce all over the place.Eventually, after some talk by the attorney, they let the attorney LOOK at the warrant but refused to provide a copy.
Do you really believe the FBI would fail to present a warrant at the time of its execution when it's being served at a property owned by a former president? There's no way they would risk violating federal law in a case as sensitive as this.They should be prosecuted for not immediately providing the warrant.
Only people who get their news from right-wing sources that tend to distort facts to get a rise out of their readers and viewers.People were outraged.
No, a judge requested that the DOJ respond to the requests made by media and Judicial Watch to make the warrant public, which Attorney General Garland did today. He requested a court to unseal it. He doesn't have the power to unseal it himself and while I doubt the courts will turn his request down, there's still the chance that Trump will file a motion to block it.As I also reported, the judge ordered the DOJ to make the warrant public.
Quibble, my understanding is that the DOJ asked the Judge to release the warrant info as it is the judge that actually issues the warrant. Normally the judge will keep the warrant confidential so as to avoid appearances of impropriety, but this isn't normally.Read this post again: Federal Judge Orders DOJ to Provide Copy of Trump Raid Warrant
Even Christina Bobb said she received a copy. Her recollection of events seems to bounce all over the place.
Christina Bobb, a lawyer and aide to Mr. Trump who said she received a copy of the search warrant, told one interviewer that the agents were looking for “presidential records or any possibly classified material.”
F.B.I. Search of Trump’s Home Pushes Long Conflict Into Public View - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Do you really believe the FBI would fail to present a warrant at the time of its execution when it's being served at a property owned by a former president? There's no way they would risk violating federal law in a case as sensitive as this.
Only people who get their news from right-wing sources that tend to distort facts to get a rise out of their readers and viewers.
No, a judge requested that the DOJ respond to the requests made by media and Judicial Watch to make the warrant public, which Attorney General Garland did today.
I can only tell you what Trump's attorney said and the Attorney General said.Read this post again:
Do you really believe the FBI would fail to present a warrant at the time of its execution when it's being served at a property owned by a former president? There's no way they would risk violating federal law in a case as sensitive as this.
Trump's attorney said she received it one of her interviews, and the Attorney General said it was provided. Sounds like everyone's in agreement.I can only tell you what Trump's attorney said and the Attorney General said.
Well if you haven't realized by now, Trump's attorneys are not a reliable source of information.I can only tell you what Trump's attorney said and the Attorney General said.
Do you have proof that no copy has yet been given?False. All he claimed was "on the day of search." As was reported, they first refused to let Trump's attorney even look at the warrant.
Eventually, after some talk by the attorney, they let the attorney LOOK at the warrant but refused to provide a copy.
Die-hard MAGA fans were outraged, you mean.People were outraged.
And so all this bees-in-bonnet excitement is over a few hours delay?We don't know when during the day a warrant was eventually provided.
Are you sure it was not provided to some representative of Trump immediately?They should be prosecuted for not immediately providing the warrant.
No, that's not what the judge ordered. The judge ordered the DOJ to respond with reasons for not making the warrant public or make it public.As I also reported, the judge ordered the DOJ to make the warrant public.
The full text of the relevant rule was posted up thread, and it explicitly allows for electronic service of the warrant.By law, the officers carrying out the warrant are required to leave a physical copy of the warrant and inventory of everything they took from the premises. It can either be given to the owner of the premises, a representative of the owner, or if no one is available at the time the warrant is carried out, it can be left at a location on the property where it can easily be seen and found by the owner.
That's for when a computer or other electronic storage device is being remotely accessed. Search of physical property requires a physical warrant.The full text of the relevant rule was posted up thread, and it explicitly allows for electronic service of the warrant.
We do now, The DOJ has requested that the judge allow the warrant to be made public unless Donald objects by 3PM tomorrow.False. As per my previous point we know no such thing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?