FBI and Biden Admin on rampage

[JacksBratt]

Looks like the FBI and the Biden administration are on a rampage as they know that they have to do something radical to stop the coming karma..

Tell me what you think of Dr. Steves predictions.

https://www.youtube.com/c/DrSteveTurleyTV/videos

 

[SarahsKnight]

as they know that they have to do something radical to stop the coming karma..

Umm ... karma for what?

 

[DerSchweik]

Looks like the FBI and the Biden administration are on a rampage as they know that they have to do something radical to stop the coming karma..

Tell me what you think of Dr. Steves predictions.

https://www.youtube.com/c/DrSteveTurleyTV/videos

I guess I'm missing your point (though I agree in general with the statement about them being on a rampage against Republicans). The link takes you to ALL of Turley's videos on YouTube. Was there one in particular that prompted this thread?

 

[brinny]

I guess I'm missing your point (though I agree in general with the statement about them being on a rampage against Republicans). The link takes you to ALL of Turley's videos on YouTube. Was there one in particular that prompted this thread?

The first one on the list.

*waves*

 

[DerSchweik]

The first one on the list.

*waves*

I saw that and figured that *might* be the one to which he's referring - but then, why not just share that link?

 

[brinny]

I saw that and figured that *might* be the one to which he's referring - but then, why not just share that link?

i dunno.....i'm just thankful that it's being posted at all lol

(it's good seeing you again.)

 

[DerSchweik]

i dunno.....i'm just thankful that it's being posted at all lol

Agreed

(it's good seeing you again.)

Thank you. You too!

We'll see how long it lasts this time...

 

[brinny]

Agreed

Thank you. You too!

We'll see how long it lasts this time...

LOL!

 

[Landon Caeli]

@JacksBratt, did you have a better link?

 

[Pavel Mosko]

Umm ... karma for what?

That's easy. Just because you do not like someone, or find them obnoxious or even think they are some kind of derogatory term that is banned by this site.... That does not mean they do not have their Constitutional rights.

It interesting to see that convicted criminals, terrorist nations and groups etc. often have been treated better than how Donald Trunp has in the media, social media, FBI and Justice Department.


This also very interesting when you compare the various things Donald Trump has said or did to other Democratic politicians and Democrats cabinet members.

Like one of Bill Clinton's staffers who intentionally smuggled documents out of the National archives, congressman Erick Swallel sleeping with a Chinese spy, congresswoman Maxine Waters making direct comments that were directly inciting violence against Trump's cabinet (angrily telling her supporters "to push in on them and tell them they are not welcome").

There were lots of things going on in Obama's administration that were scandals worthy of investigation that were never really pursued, "Fast and Furious", the Lois Lerner IRS scandal

Not to mention Hunter Biden's ties to China, Ukraine and the action taken to impeachment Trump based on Ukraine and the efforts by the IRS to suppress the laptop from being in the news which would have swung the election if it was widely reported.

 

[Fantine]

If it takes a rampage to catch a thief, bring it on.
I don't think "karma" will assault the angels of justice. They will be instruments of justice for someone whose misdeeds are finally catching up with him--despite teams of high paid lawyers, lawsuits, ignoring subpoenas, postponements, prior executive privilege, and accomplices in high places.

 

[Trusting in Him]

He that diggeth a pit shall fall into it; and whoso breaketh an hedge, a serpent shall bite him.
(Ecclesiastes 10:8)

Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolleth a stone, it will return upon him.
(Proverbs 26:27)

For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known. Therefore whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness shall be heard in the light; and that which ye have spoken in the ear in closets shall be proclaimed upon the housetops. (Luke 12:2-3)

Opps!

 

[childeye 2]

That's easy. Just because you do not like someone, or find them obnoxious or even think they are some kind of derogatory term that is banned by this site.... That does not mean they do not have their Constitutional rights.

I tend to agree with Fantine about karma. I don't think karma would be against the angels of justice. What justice looks like when the merciful will receive mercy because they were merciful, is a nuance that would make karma incongruent with any power coming from a hypocritical vengeance. We all reason on a fundamental dichotomy of Good/bad. Those of sound reasoning would all agree that stopping someone who is doing harm to others does not qualify as vendetta, but as stopping the harm and the suffering it causes. That's also what compassion does.

The issue of the OP is therefore traversing the semantics that occur in the dichotomies of Good/bad, Light/dark. And there are no differentiating qualifications for words claiming to be the light, since they could just as well be propaganda posing as the light. A sound reasoning doesn't conclude that lies are harmless, and that the heart is not troubled with being misguided. In other words, our political feelings are not always legitimate in the sense that they can be manifested through belief in false information that of itself isn’t real to begin with.

For example, how do we know the FBI so called 'rampage' isn't the karma? The presentation is therefore a spin (a particular interpretation). And because it is supporting a personal bias it is not the Light, it is propaganda. The semantics make it clear that "karma" in the context of the op is an insinuation because it omits the issue of whether the FBI has a just reason for any actions the op is referring to. It therefore insinuates that the FBI is unjust in those actions and their intentions. That's an ad hominem logical fallacy. Moreover, since the common interest in justice is that the damage that the harm done in the world be minimized, any suggestion that there will be pay-back for what is happening to "Trump", qualifies as a personal vendetta, not karma.

 

[JacksBratt]

I guess I'm missing your point (though I agree in general with the statement about them being on a rampage against Republicans). The link takes you to ALL of Turley's videos on YouTube. Was there one in particular that prompted this thread?

OH, I'm very sorry. There was only one that I was speaking to. This one.

 

[JacksBratt]

Umm ... karma for what?

The Karma for all of the kangaroo courts on DT that have turned out to be no more than distractions, click bait, news fodder for viewers and plain out mud slingning.

 

[JacksBratt]

@JacksBratt, did you have a better link?

See post... #14

 

[JacksBratt]

He that diggeth a pit shall fall into it; and whoso breaketh an hedge, a serpent shall bite him.
(Ecclesiastes 10:8)

Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolleth a stone, it will return upon him.
(Proverbs 26:27)

For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known. Therefore whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness shall be heard in the light; and that which ye have spoken in the ear in closets shall be proclaimed upon the housetops. (Luke 12:2-3)

Opps!

Very true words..

 

[JacksBratt]

I tend to agree with Fantine about karma. I don't think karma would be against the angels of justice. What justice looks like when the merciful will receive mercy because they were merciful, is a nuance that would make karma incongruent with any power coming from a hypocritical vengeance. We all reason on a fundamental dichotomy of Good/bad. Those of sound reasoning would all agree that stopping someone who is doing harm to others does not qualify as vendetta, but as stopping the harm and the suffering it causes. That's also what compassion does.

The issue of the OP is therefore traversing the semantics that occur in the dichotomies of Good/bad, Light/dark. And there are no differentiating qualifications for words claiming to be the light, since they could just as well be propaganda posing as the light. A sound reasoning doesn't conclude that lies are harmless, and that the heart is not troubled with being misguided. In other words, our political feelings are not always legitimate in the sense that they can be manifested through belief in false information that of itself isn’t real to begin with.

For example, how do we know the FBI so called 'rampage' isn't the karma? The presentation is therefore a spin (a particular interpretation). And because it is supporting a personal bias it is not the Light, it is propaganda. The semantics make it clear that "karma" in the context of the op is an insinuation because it omits the issue of whether the FBI has a just reason for any actions the op is referring to. It therefore insinuates that the FBI is unjust in those actions and their intentions. That's an ad hominem logical fallacy. Moreover, since the common interest in justice is that the damage that the harm done in the world be minimized, any suggestion that there will be pay-back for what is happening to "Trump", qualifies as a personal vendetta, not karma.

It will all be determined in God's time..

 

[childeye 2]

It will all be determined in God's time..

We can be certain that God is not unjust and also that the Buddhist term 'karma' does not mean vendetta.

 

[lifepsyop]

If it takes a rampage to catch a thief, bring it on.
I don't think "karma" will assault the angels of justice. They will be instruments of justice for someone whose misdeeds are finally catching up with him--despite teams of high paid lawyers, lawsuits, ignoring subpoenas, postponements, prior executive privilege, and accomplices in high places.

Just out of curiosity, did you believe in the Trump-Russia collusion hoax back in its media heyday?

Do you care that law enforcement was rigging what are now admitted to be fraudulent FISA warrants to go after Trump's administration? Or following leads that they knew were products of his political opposition? That the lead operators of the counter-intelligence investigation into Trump were privately texting how much they detested him and his supporters?

Does it matter that the politicians leading the public advance of "Trump-Russia Conspiracy" knew and admitted in private sessions that there was no actual evidence of it?

Does any of this matter to you?

Is it not logical to assume there is more going on here than the one-sided cartoonish narrative that Trump is always guilty of everything?

At this point it seems clear to me and may others that none of this hostility against Trump is really about facts or evidence. A lot of people just really hate Trump on an ideological level, and they are willing to sacrifice the credibility of all America's institutions to take him down. It doesn't actually matter if he is guilty of what he is accused of... Donald Trump's mere existence makes him automatically guilty and so his enemies are justified in making up crimes to destroy him and his followers.

Today the same people who were wringing their hands about Trump's supposed 'threat to democracy', are now nodding in enthusiastic agreement about the idea of launching an official state-sponsored domestic war on his tens of millions of supporters. And they don't even recognize a shred of irony in this.

What a sad and embarrassing end to America.