Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
"The Last Question" was also an amazing short.
MoonlessNight said:I liked that one, but not as much as most people because I thought the ending was rather predictable about halfway through, which kind of lessens the impact.
As a mathematician with some training in computer science I found "The Feeling of Power" both funny and sad (it is really quite shocking to remember that it was written in 1957, which probably makes it Asimov's most visionary in the sense that it predicted a social change long before it happened.)
I am also fond of "It's Such a Beautiful day" (for reasons that are likely similar to the reasons that I like "The Feeling of Power") and the early part of the Foundation series (up to and through the Mule).
Just out of curiousity, what are your feelings on those pun stories that Asimov was fond of writing (you know, the ones that are usually 1-2 pages and whose only purpose is to set up a bad pun at the end)?
I can't think of his name, but he writes Talon of the Silver Hawk, anyone know his name?
Rygel said:What? No David Drake?
I had to pick other, so he would get on the list.
Rabidone said:Larry Niven - Nobody does hard core sci-fi better.
Personally I liked Sphere and the Andromeda Strain the best. I felt that those were his two books where he stopped writing so much on auto-pilot and actually tried to write an original and thought provoking science fiction work. The rest of his stuff was enjoyable for me, but ultimately largely forgettable.rosemerry said:Hey don't forget Micheal Chriton. Yes his books are sold as mainstream but how sci-fi can you get with genetically engineered dinosaurs.
He's not considered Sci-Fi????rosemerry said:Hey don't forget Micheal Chriton. Yes his books are sold as mainstream but how sci-fi can you get with genetically engineered dinosaurs.
What people are classified as is pretty arbitrary and usually based off their first book. No matter what Clive Barker writes, that book is going to end up in the horror section (and he's actually pretty mad about this situation). Many of Crichton's early works (particularly if you count stuff he wrote under a pseudonym) are more thrillers with sci-fi elements (the Terminal Man being a good example of this), and some don't even have sci-fi elements (for example, The Great Train Robbery). Of his early work the only one you really had to call science fiction was The Andromeda Strain, and even that could be called a medical thriller if you wanted to. So his early stuff naturally got put in the thriller section and to keep his books together in stores the rest have been put there.rosemerry said:well he is printed under action/thriller I think not a sci-fi label. But if you read his stuff classic science fiction or something.
Nienor said:That's why I created Science Fantasy![]()
I don't know, I just decided that books (like Dune) that used both should be in a genre that includes both. I don't know if there is an official science fantasy genre, or what would be in it.spacedout said:I always thought the term "science-fantasy" best described "dying earth" tales, or fantasy-like stories where "magic" is often synonymous with "wisdom/science of the Ancients, forgotten for aeons."
My favorite sci-fi (or science fantasy) authors are Jack Vance, Gene Wolfe and Frank Herbert.