• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Fantastic Adventist Today Article!

RC_NewProtestants

Senior Veteran
May 2, 2006
2,766
63
Washington State
Visit site
✟25,750.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Therefore it is no longer necessary to think logically to acknowledge actual history or to speak well of your fellow Christians. Because the Traditional SDA church is founded by God in the 1800's.

Yes you are in trouble.
 
Upvote 0

honorthesabbath

Senior Veteran
Aug 10, 2005
4,067
78
76
Arkansas
✟27,180.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Therefore it is no longer necessary to think logically to acknowledge actual history or to speak well of your fellow Christians. Because the Traditional SDA church is founded by God in the 1800's.

Yes you are in trouble.
ONLY in your mind RC--only in your mind. God is in control, not you.
 
Upvote 0

Sophia7

Tall73's Wife
Site Supporter
Sep 24, 2005
12,364
456
✟84,145.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Perhaps your personal background has led you to be unduly critical of emotional expressions in worship. The fact that some churches take emotionalism too far does not mean that all contemporary worship styles and music are evil. I've been to many worship services in which people were praising God with great feeling, but it was nothing like what I observed in the Pentecostal church that I visited with a friend in high school.
 
Upvote 0

RC_NewProtestants

Senior Veteran
May 2, 2006
2,766
63
Washington State
Visit site
✟25,750.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The funny thing is Sophia, it is to emotionalism that Honor bases most of her posts. When I noted the illogical nature of her statement she responded with emotionalism based upon her belief that God established the SDA church in the 1800's. Most logical people would say that Christ established the church about 1750 years before the 1800's. She produces little documentary evidence for her statements yet expects people to simply believe them unquestioningly and if they don't she restates the same thing over and over again as if that will make it more acceptable.

When you deal in that kind of emotionalism you can't deal with reason and logic because they are two different poles in the process of thinking. Since emotions are the guide it matters little what other people regard as right or wrong it is defined by her own emotionalism as being right or wrong. This is summed up well in our previous conversation. She does not deal with what is stated but plays to her emotional claims that God is on her side.

 
Upvote 0

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Typical trad response. More proud to be an Adventist than a Christian.

Interesting you should say that Mankin. Check this out:

Do you consider yourself an Adventist first or a Christian first?



I am absolutely, positively, and primarily a Christian. By that I mean that Christ, and Christ alone, is my reason for living here and my hope for enjoying eternity in the hereafter. I’m an Adventist because it is one of the best vehicles I know of for expressing my faith in the love, mercy, grace, and justice of Jesus Christ. And while some Adventists detour into matters of secondary importance (health, prophecy, lifestyle, etc.), only faith in Christ can rescue us from this earthly experience. That’s why I will always be first and foremost a Christian.
—Steve Chavez, managing editor, Adventist Review, Silver Spring, Maryland



Christian first; Adventist second. Adventism finds its identity within Christianity, not Christianity within Adventism. The ongoing remnant of true Biblebelieving Christians down through the centuries has gone by all kinds of different names, but always in the context of being Christian.
—Clarissa Worley, pastor, singer, speaker, and writer, Salem, Oregon



I have accepted Christ as my Savior; therefore, I am first a Christian. I have become a member of His church—the Seventh-day Adventist Church. Simply stated, I believe the Adventist Church, though only 1 percent of all the Christian community, is most like the early New Testament Church in its biblical teachings and acceptance of the Great Commission to take the gospel to every creature on earth. I am in a covenant relationship with Christ. I express that publicly by being a part of and supporting His Church. Therefore I am a Seventh-day Adventist Christian.
—G. Edward Reid, stewardship director, North American Division of Seventh-day Adventists, Silver Spring, Maryland



Hands down, I consider myself a Christian first. It is important to keep organized religion “in its place.” The non-sacred culture and dogma of an organized religion can easily overwhelm the joy of Christianity. I refuse to allow this to happen in my life.
—Lynn Caldwell, American Humanics Campus Director, Southern Adventist University, Collegedale, Tennessee



I consider myself a Christ-follower. As this overlaps with Adventists and Christians, I am part of those communities as well.
—A. Allan Martin, associate professor of Discipleship and Family Ministry, Andrews University, Berrien Springs, Michigan

Liberal and moderate Adventists all concur, Christian first. Makes sense, that's the way it should be with all of us, right?

Not so fast...
 
Upvote 0

NightEternal

Evangelical SDA
Apr 18, 2007
5,639
127
Toronto, Ontario
✟6,559.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives


If by Adventist, we mean the most biblically consistent Christian, then absolutely yes—I’m an Adventist first. This kind of Adventism is radically Bible-based, lifetransforming, intelligent, authentically evangelical and ecumenical, mission-driven but humble, gutsy but irenic, and spiritually vibrant! I call it Adventisque, because it is Christianity at its best. As a theologically conservative body, it is the only credible eschatological movement capable of actually preparing a holy people to meet their holy Lord at His second coming. The Bible points to these “Adventing” Christians in the following words: Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus (Revelation 14:12; cf. 12:17; 19:10).
—Samuel Koranteng-Pipim, Ph.D., director, Public Campus Ministries, Michigan Conference

Leave it to the ultra-right Trads to ruin the consensus!

It's clear where thier allegiance lies, and that is to Adventism first and foremost. We have it in writing from one of thier very own prominent leaders!
 
Upvote 0

honorthesabbath

Senior Veteran
Aug 10, 2005
4,067
78
76
Arkansas
✟27,180.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Sophia--where is ANY of my posts have you read me say that I was opposed to ALL expressions of emotions in worship? NO WHERE!

So once again I am subjected to you and a few others radical interpretations of what I say.

 
Upvote 0

mva1985

Senior Veteran
Jun 18, 2007
3,448
223
58
Ohio
Visit site
✟27,128.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican

Great quote thanks for posting it!!!

By his definition an Adventist = most Biblically consistent Christian.
 
Upvote 0

RC_NewProtestants

Senior Veteran
May 2, 2006
2,766
63
Washington State
Visit site
✟25,750.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Great quote thanks for posting it!!!

By his definition an Adventist = most Biblically consistent Christian.
Ah yes, if by Adventist you mean my private definition... That is what Pipim said. But he is not the only one with a silly answer. The guy who said he is a Christ follower is an equally foolish answer. What does he think the word Christian means?
 
Upvote 0

Lebesgue

Senior Member
Feb 25, 2008
717
28
✟23,529.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat

The Adventism movement was borne of a mistake by William Miller, trying to set a date for the return of Jesus, when the Bible EXPLICITLY states NOT to do that.

The IJ was made to rationalise this and salve the "wounds" of those who suffered the "Great Disappointment". I understand how they must have felt, they gave up EVERYTHING thinking Jesus would return on October 22, 1844 and when He didn't it must have really hurt.

But the Investigative Judgement HURTS too.
I have shared that when I realised there was NO WAY I could pass the Investigative Judgement no matter what I did or didn't do, I was ready to just give up on G-d and be an atheist. I figured I couldn't be saved, so why no just do whatever I want to do it's a "wash" anyway.
I COULD NOT and DID NOT have any assurance of salvation when I was an Adventist and this NEARLY DESTROYED me spiritually.

Do you know what it's like to not be able to go to sleep at night because you are so worried that if you forgot to confess a sin or was ignorant of one and if you died in your sleep, G-d would unforgive everything He had forgiven before as Ellen White said in Chapter 28 of the Great Controversy? Well I do and it was a truly horrid way to live

Maybe your experience wasn't like that but I spent 14 years in HARDCORE Trad SDA churches that beat people over the head with Ellen White and taught the IJ and character perfection and all that other stuff.

Yes there are good things in Adventism. The Sabbath is
one of them and the food laws are another.

I think if the SDA church made the changes mentioned in the article mentioned in the OP it would improve much for the better. Not enough to win me back, but I think the need for magazines like Proclamtion would go away.

G-d Bless.

Shalom,

Lebesgue
 
Upvote 0

Lebesgue

Senior Member
Feb 25, 2008
717
28
✟23,529.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat

I do think Proclamation goes too far at times. I also think that IF the SDA church made the changes mentioned in the article mentioned in the OP it would improve much for the better. Not enough that I would come back but I think you would see Proclamtion lightening up some on Adventism.

But, make no mistake about it, there is some Adventist invective directed at Proclamtion magazine.
I started reading it when I was procession out of the Adventist Church and when the Pastor of my former church found out about it, he waved a copy of Proclamtion in front of me and yelled that they are doing the work of Satan and that I would be disfellowshipped and branded an enemy of the SDA church if I didn't stop reading it and he further threatend that my wife would divorce me if that happend.(Hmmmm I left the church and my marriage is STRONGER than ever).
This same pastor did a sermon which he later admitted was directed at moi(duh! I had already figured that out),where he was telling the congregation to only go to SDA church officers and Pastors with questions and not to "outside" sources, their salvation could depend on that.

While Proclamation may go too far at times, The SDA chuch DOES need to reform and become like what the article in the OP mentions.

G-d Bless.

Shalom,

Lebesgue
 
Upvote 0