Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
Falling away from grace
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ldonjohn" data-source="post: 75991208" data-attributes="member: 339395"><p>There is no #4 other than that which you added for the sake of your argument.</p><p></p><p>Now you think you can read my mind. Wrong again. You twisted my words to fit your argument. In post #21 I stated the following</p><p></p><p><em>"I have 2 grown children. When they were young children, living in my home, I would discipline them whenever they were disobedient or did something wrong, and they were still my child. <strong>If one or both of them decide to denounce me as his or her parent, he or she would still be my child. </strong>Neither one could ever become unborn as my child."</em></p><p><em></em></p><p>The last sentence is saying that if my child makes the choice to denounce me as his/her parent that decision does NOT change the position in the life of my child as forever being my child. In the same way, your inability to understand that reasoning does NOT change the validity of the argument. <em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p>Then in your post #31<em>,</em> You said this about what I think:<em> "None of the definitions you site fit how you use the word. <strong>You think it means inability to decide to abandon the Christian faith</strong>. That state doesn’t exist."</em></p><p><em></em></p><p>Again you are twisting the truth of my words to fit your argument. Please re-read the related quotes above.<em></em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Regards,</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>John</em></p><p><em></em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ldonjohn, post: 75991208, member: 339395"] There is no #4 other than that which you added for the sake of your argument. Now you think you can read my mind. Wrong again. You twisted my words to fit your argument. In post #21 I stated the following [I]"I have 2 grown children. When they were young children, living in my home, I would discipline them whenever they were disobedient or did something wrong, and they were still my child. [B]If one or both of them decide to denounce me as his or her parent, he or she would still be my child. [/B]Neither one could ever become unborn as my child." [/I] The last sentence is saying that if my child makes the choice to denounce me as his/her parent that decision does NOT change the position in the life of my child as forever being my child. In the same way, your inability to understand that reasoning does NOT change the validity of the argument. [I] [/I] Then in your post #31[I],[/I] You said this about what I think:[I] "None of the definitions you site fit how you use the word. [B]You think it means inability to decide to abandon the Christian faith[/B]. That state doesn’t exist." [/I] Again you are twisting the truth of my words to fit your argument. Please re-read the related quotes above.[I] Regards, John [/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
Falling away from grace
Top
Bottom