Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
Falling away from grace
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dorothy Mae" data-source="post: 75988209" data-attributes="member: 409954"><p>The word does not exist and so the state does not exist. The word to describe the state of "unborn" is died or die. A man can die. A faith can die. This playing with making up words that do not exist and say therefore the faith cannot undergo that word that does not exsit in the language is really a very weak argument and mere semantics. SHows me that the position is theologically weak if one has to resort to making up non-existance words.</p><p></p><p>Again, I know all the arguments from the OSAS crowd. They are all cookie-cutter the same so I know none of those who hold this position ever thought about it but simply learned the arguments from men and swallowed them hook, line and sinker. There is no point in discussing this because it has a deeply emotional hold on those who believe it. I can see why. They think their whole eternity in Heaven stands on that theology being true so they defend it to the teeth and they line out every verse that challenges that emotionally held theology. So I leave you to your position as I know nothing could convince you otherwise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dorothy Mae, post: 75988209, member: 409954"] The word does not exist and so the state does not exist. The word to describe the state of "unborn" is died or die. A man can die. A faith can die. This playing with making up words that do not exist and say therefore the faith cannot undergo that word that does not exsit in the language is really a very weak argument and mere semantics. SHows me that the position is theologically weak if one has to resort to making up non-existance words. Again, I know all the arguments from the OSAS crowd. They are all cookie-cutter the same so I know none of those who hold this position ever thought about it but simply learned the arguments from men and swallowed them hook, line and sinker. There is no point in discussing this because it has a deeply emotional hold on those who believe it. I can see why. They think their whole eternity in Heaven stands on that theology being true so they defend it to the teeth and they line out every verse that challenges that emotionally held theology. So I leave you to your position as I know nothing could convince you otherwise. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
Falling away from grace
Top
Bottom