I have multiple choices if I'm willing to give up some things I do on the Internet. I'm a gamer which means I have to have a solid Internet connection. In my case, it's Cox Cable. I cannot go with anything else that provides the level of service I need. Cox has been granted basically a monopoly in my area and other options can't get in. So, it's either Cox or nothing.
Break up that system and I'd be willing to see net neutrality go because Cox would have to compete with other providers and they'd have incentive to not charge more for streaming Netflix or whatever.
I'm not sure I understand what net neutrality is overall.
It was in place for a while, and now it is not again.
Has anything changed between those two periods of time? I'm totally serious.
Did you have competition prior to net neutrality, and don't anymore?
I don't get it I suppose. Did they charge more to stream stuff before, and didn't after - and now will do it again? Is that all net neutrality is? Throttling?
I live in the sticks and have no cable or DSL, yet I have several options including multiple cell phone plans and at least two satellite plans to choose from.
I'm familiar with this scenario. People that live a couple of miles away - not considered the sticks - don't have any options....and never have.
They can get a hot spot from the cell companies. I haven't heard of any satellite locally, although that doesn't mean it isn't there. Although, Satellite is HUGELY expensive.
Many places don't have cable, fiber, dsl, etc. They didn't have it prior to this, nor afterwards. As far as the digital divide? That's something I would bet they never address. It will leave children behind in technology, but big companies like Cox, Comcast, ATT, etc? Its not their concern.
I wish they would find something that addresses that.