Utter nonsense, nowhere even hinted at in Scripture.There will be a third temple built in Jerusalem, the Antichrist will set up an abomination that desolates in, according to the Scriptures. Jesus will build the fourth, Millennial temple, according to the Scriptures. They will both be stone buildings. Prophecy iis not interpreted by allegorical spiritualization.
There won't. This is simply a Dispensationalist delusion. The idea is blasphemous.
This is the result of making "Israel" the center of the universe rather than our Lord Christ. Y'all are abandoning Christianity to follow some pseudo-Jewish fantasy. How anyone who claims to follow Christ can believe that Christless Temple Judaism will return to replace the Church (talk about a diabolical form of "replacement theology"!) is beyond my ken. Read Hebrews 10! If you don't understand it, read it again! If you still don't understand it, try a different translation! Keep reading it until you get it. Read the whole epistle, it isn't that long! Understand that CHRIST IS THE CENTER OF EVERYTHING! NOT ISRAEL, NOT A NEW TEMPLE (OR AN OLD ONE), NOT ANYTHING IN THE OLD TESTAMENT, NO DAMNABLE BLASPHEMOUS UNHOLY UNCLEAN UNTHINKABLE ANIMAL SACRIFICES, NOTHING! Our Lord Christ is the Be All and End All!
This will NEVER be! The idea is abominable. CHRIST IS OUR SACRIFICE, ONCE AND FOR ALL!
How about EVIL and SATANIC? Here's a bit of what old Zeke had to say:
21In the first month, in the fourteenth day of the month, ye shall have the passover, a feast of seven days; unleavened bread shall be eaten. 22And upon that day shall the prince prepare for himself and for all the people of the land a bullock for a sin offering. 23And seven days of the feast he shall prepare a burnt offering to the LORD, seven bullocks and seven rams without blemish daily the seven days; and a kid of the goats daily for a sin offering.24And he shall prepare a meat offering of an ephah for a bullock, and an ephah for a ram, and an hin of oil for an ephah. 25In the seventh month, in the fifteenth day of the month, shall he do the like in the feast of the seven days, according to the sin offering, according to the burnt offering, and according to the meat offering, and according to the oil.
Same old offerings, and no mention of them being "memorials", which idea is ridiculous in any case.
A sheer fantasy, designed to make the idea of this fictional Temple that DFs dote on so much not seem like such rank heresy.
READ HEBREWS, and abandon this horrid deception!
We'd have the New Testament, which it seems may have escaped your notice.
The preterist views you hold to have been refuted in my post #131. There will be a third temple built in Jerusalem, the Antichrist will set up an abomination that desolates in, according to the Scriptures. Jesus will build the fourth, Millennial temple, according to the Scriptures. They will both be stone buildings. Prophecy iis not interpreted by allegorical spiritualization.
Quaar92
There won't. This is simply a Dispensationalist delusion. The idea is blasphemous.
This is the result of making "Israel" the center of the universe rather than our Lord Christ. Y'all are abandoning Christianity to follow some pseudo-Jewish fantasy. How anyone who claims to follow Christ can believe that Christless Temple Judaism will return to replace the Church (talk about a diabolical form of "replacement theology"!) is beyond my ken. Read Hebrews 10! If you don't understand it, read it again! If you still don't understand it, try a different translation! Keep reading it until you get it. Read the whole epistle, it isn't that long! Understand that CHRIST IS THE CENTER OF EVERYTHING! NOT ISRAEL, NOT A NEW TEMPLE (OR AN OLD ONE), NOT ANYTHING IN THE OLD TESTAMENT, NO DAMNABLE BLASPHEMOUS UNHOLY UNCLEAN UNTHINKABLE ANIMAL SACRIFICES, NOTHING! Our Lord Christ is the Be All and End All!
This will NEVER be! The idea is abominable. CHRIST IS OUR SACRIFICE, ONCE AND FOR ALL!
How about EVIL and SATANIC? Here's a bit of what old Zeke had to say:
21In the first month, in the fourteenth day of the month, ye shall have the passover, a feast of seven days; unleavened bread shall be eaten. 22And upon that day shall the prince prepare for himself and for all the people of the land a bullock for a sin offering. 23And seven days of the feast he shall prepare a burnt offering to the LORD, seven bullocks and seven rams without blemish daily the seven days; and a kid of the goats daily for a sin offering.24And he shall prepare a meat offering of an ephah for a bullock, and an ephah for a ram, and an hin of oil for an ephah. 25In the seventh month, in the fifteenth day of the month, shall he do the like in the feast of the seven days, according to the sin offering, according to the burnt offering, and according to the meat offering, and according to the oil.
Same old offerings, and no mention of them being "memorials", which idea is ridiculous in any case.
A sheer fantasy, designed to make the idea of this fictional Temple that DFs dote on so much not seem like such rank heresy.
READ HEBREWS, and abandon this horrid deception!
DeaconDean said:" First, Ezekiel nowhere stated or even hinted at the idea that these sacrifices will be memorial in nature. Second, Ezekiel specifically wrote that these offerings will make atonement (45:15, 17, 20). The word for “atonement” in Ezekiel is the same as the word used in Leviticus. Third, the parallel between sacrifices and the Lord’s Supper intimates that animal sacrifices had no efficacy whatsoever."
Source
Furthermore:
"With this background, we can better appreciate the significance of today’s passage and its description of worship in this new temple during the era of restoration. Note that the east gate of the inner court remains closed all day every day except the Sabbath and the day of the festival of the new moon (46:1). The north and south gates remain open on a daily basis so that worshippers can present daily offerings, but the east gate is closed. On the days that the east gate on the inner court is open all day, only the prince—the king and leader of Israel—can enter by it (vv. 2–8). Also, this east gate can be opened at any time the prince wants to make a freewill offering, but it only stays open for the duration of the offering (v. 12). Since only the prince can enter by the same east gate of the inner court that God entered in Ezekiel 43, the true prince of the restoration is identified with Yahweh in a special way.
Although the prince enters the inner court of the temple complex by the east gate, he enters the outer court with the people by the north gate or the south gate (vv. 9–10). The point is that the prince of the restoration identifies himself with his people in leading them into God’s presence. Moreover, the prince offers sacrifices (vv. 4–7). The king in ancient Israel occasionally offered sacrifices (1 Chron. 16:1–3), but the priests alone offered the regular offerings. Ezekiel’s prince has an even greater role in the community’s regular worship.
Jesus fulfills Ezekiel’s vision of the prince. He is identified with both Yahweh and His people, being truly God and truly man (John 1:1–18). And He offered the only sacrifice needed for us to come regularly before God—the once-for-all sacrifice of Himself (Heb. 9:11–28)."
Source
DeaconDean said:An Absurdity
However, it is absurd to say that such an object lesson or memorial will be needed. As we shall see, Scripture declares such a thing to be "useless". Premillennialists of all persuasions believe that Jesus Christ Himself, the full and final Sacrifice for sins, will be present on earth in Jerusalem, reigning during the millennium, His wounds on display to the entire world. It would be an insult to Christ to reinstitute the bloody type in the presence of the once-for-all Fulfillment.
Furthermore, Ezekiel 43 speaks of these sacrifices not as memorials, but in the same terms by which they were spoken of in the Pentateuch, as offerings for sin (verses 19, 21, 22, 25), the means of purifying the altar (26), and the basis of acceptance (27). This is very clearly Old Covenant, pre-Cross language.
Even the ordinance of the New Covenant, the Lord's Supper, is for the purpose of proclaiming "the Lord's death till He comes" (1 Corinthians 11:26, Acts 1:11). When Christ is once more visibly present, no such bloodless memorial - much less the bloody sacrifice of bulls and goats - will be needed.
The New Testament Interprets the Old
Dear Christian friend, regardless of your position on eschatology, you must always remember one thing as you look at Old Testament prophecy: The New Testament is God the Holy Spirit's commentary on the Old Testament. In the books of Acts, Romans, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and especially in the book of Hebrews, we find this central fact bannered before us: All of the Old Testament ceremonial system was done away, forever, by the person and work of our Lord Jesus Christ.
The NT authors are all Jewish, with the exception of Luke. Including Jesus Himself. Capiche?!
Quasar92
Paul was a Jew, so show me where he taught a re-institution of the sacrifices?
To whom was Paul sent?
Your case does not hold water.
God Bless
Till all are one.
Show me anywhere in the Bible supporting evidence for your claims; there will be no restoration of the kingdom of Israel, and no animal sacrificial system restoration during the Millennium.
The case I have presented speaks for itself. It not only holds water, but is fully supported by the Scripture to prove it, in total contrast to your views.
And where, may I ask, did you obtain your qualifications to teach the Bible, let alone eschatology?
Quasar92
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?