Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
With science one cannot test the future or far past laws and forces. The way we test what the past was like is the bible. That...or nothing.
We should see what we see.
Do you mean truth or Truth?
And what is the difference between "truth" and "Truth", other than the capital letter on the latter?
It was the American media that dubbed it the God particle since Higgs Boson had named it the "God@#$ particle" and the American reporters said that such a name will not be accepted in America, and renamed it to the God particle.The Internet isn't the media?
Maybe some of us don't like to talk technobabble all the time.
Was Pluto truth/reality from 1930-2006?I mean reality. What is actually correct.
It's about time American reporters stood up to a scientist.It was the American media that dubbed it the God particle since Higgs Boson had named it the "God@#$ particle" and the American reporters said that such a name will not be accepted in America, and renamed it to the God particle.
Yes it was until science redefined Pluto due to the increased knowledge of our solar system. AV, why are you so obsessed with the evolution of science? This is how it works; Science defines the physical world in accordance to the knowledge it has at any given time. As more knowledge is acquired the so does the definitions science gives changes to conform to the new knowledge.Was Pluto truth/reality from 1930-2006?
If not, did scientists think they had the truth/reality ... but really didn't?
Then don't tell me science has the truth/reality, when science "improves" itself with each new discovery.Yes it was until science redefined Pluto due to the increased knowledge of our solar system.
Jesus is Truth ... science claims "truth," then quickly Arab-phones it to "reality" when questioned; as this thread demonstrates.Reporters are reporters and scientists are scientists. How would you judge a reporter coming to your church and renaming Jesus?
Page 48 of what? Doctrines & Covenants?Referring to page 48...
Likewise if I were to ask in Biblical times if the Earth is flat then undoubtedly the answer would have been "yes".Then don't tell me science has the truth/reality, when science "improves" itself with each new discovery.
In 2005, if a man was on the witness stand and was asked, "I want the truth. Is Pluto our 9th planet?" The answer would have been, "Of course it is."
In 2007, if a man was on the witness stand and was asked, "I want the truth. Is Pluto our 9th planet?" The answer would be, "No, it is not."
So how would that work, two gay first lifeforms got married in the beginning?
dad said:Well, Jesus also referred to it here
Mr 13:19 -For in those days shall be affliction, such as was not from the beginning of the creation which God created unto this time, neither shall be. And of course the other folks in the New Testament believed...
1Co 15:45 -And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul;
dad said:Since present physics is all you use, of course when a scramble for a new explanation is needed after getting busted, that is what you turn to.
dad said:?? I think you mean we would not see that..?
But if we see it around the sun, that is in our space. If we think we see it on two perhaps little objects not so far away, that we think are millions of light years away and huge...well, we might need to re look! No distance or size is known, unless the far space is known.
Would God have answered YES, if He would have answered?Likewise if I were to ask in Biblical times if the Earth is flat then undoubtedly the answer would have been "yes".
Until that quest is complete, I'm going to take it with a grain of salt when science claims they have the [overall] truth.Science is a quest for knowledge and if you have missed this point then I am sure that if you think about it you will see the err of your reasoning!
I would be very surprised if he actually answered.Would God have answered YES, if He would have answered?
there is no end to the quest for new knowledge. Have you stopped learning? The day science stops learning is the day science will cease to exist.Until that quest is complete, I'm going to take it with a grain of salt when science claims they have the [overall] truth.
You're not addressing what I've been railing against ... that's the problem.I would be very surprised if he actually answered.
there is no end to the quest for new knowledge. Have you stopped learning? The day science stops learning is the day science will cease to exist.
I simply cannot understand why you fear science so
I would be very surprised if he actually answered.
there is no end to the quest for new knowledge. Have you stopped learning? The day science stops learning is the day science will cease to exist.
I simply cannot understand why you fear science so
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?