Explaining the God particle

[Tiberius]

Everything you see from your spacetime seems like your spacetime. Wow, big surprise. The question is how would you know?

Because if it operated under different laws it would look different.

No need. God talks of things that indicate more than your fishbowl physics are at work.Unless you know better and have proof you are done. God talks of a way that man and woman should be...Obama has other ideas. Who should we believe?

Unless you can prove a shred of what you are saying, you are done.

How much time does light take to travel in deep space? How do you know? Distance to a star...how do you know?

Redshift, triangulation.

Now, no doubt, you are going to declare these wrong without giving any reasonable explanation why they are wrong. Because you just want them to be wrong.

 

[dad]

The fact that everything we see in the universe behaves as though it is operating in spacetime identical to our own.

Kids please note that everything he sees of the universe is near earth! That is, light and etc travel and need to get here and here is where we see them or the light from them.

Now, your turn. Prove that space time in any other part of the universe operates differently.

How would I know? No one has been there. All we need to do is show your claims are belief.

My goodness. I've heard things that make more sense in a children's sci-fi cartoon show about hamsters.

The indicates your level of comprehension.

No they aren't.

Yes. It is certain that man uses near eath space and time and laws to interpret the stuff far far away.

You are busted.

 

[dad]

Its a particle scientists are looking for that could explain how other particles work. And they think they've spotted it.

OK. But does some vague field in earth space really explain anything much?

 

[dad]

Because if it operated under different laws it would look different.

Where? To the fishbowl observer? How would energy and etc in the fishbowl not be what can exist here?

Redshift, triangulation.

Not applicable unless our space existed. That is not known! For example, do not both of these involve time?

 

[Amber Bird]

Does anyone ever wonder if there would be less controversy over this discovery if, rather than being referred to as the "God" particle, someone had thought instead to call it something benign that would hold less chance of inflaming the religious community.

Something like, the WOW spark

That pre-squeakie before the big bang let go.

Nah, probably too optimistic.

 

[dad]

Does anyone ever wonder if there would be less controversy over this discovery if, rather than being referred to as the "God" particle, someone had thought instead to call it something benign that would hold less chance of inflaming the religious community.

Something like, the WOW spark

That pre-squeakie before the big bang let go.

Nah, probably too optimistic.

But science is all about replacing God and is inspired by Satan.

 

[florida2]

All we need to do is show your claims are belief.

No, YOU'RE the one making the wild claims who needs to show evidence and proof for them.

The universality of the laws of physics is an accepted mainstream part of science.

You're challenging that, so you need to provide evidence.

 

[Elendur]

But science is all about replacing God and is inspired by Satan.

So that is why you're so opposed to science. Then I can calm you, that's not what science is about and satan is not its inspiration.

Now you can continue your life and learn what science is really about

 

[Tiberius]

But science is all about replacing God and is inspired by Satan.

Then, by using that computer, aren't you supporting Satan? RUN, DAD!!!!

 

[Gracchus]

Then, by using that computer, aren't you supporting Satan? RUN, DAD!!!!

Hey! Lay off. He's already running as fast as he can, but it's just that he's getting nowhere. It's hard to get anywhere when you are running in such small circles.

 

[freezerman2000]

talking to dad is like..

 

[dad]

No, YOU'RE the one making the wild claims who needs to show evidence and proof for them.

My claim is that science knows not what laws existed. That is evident.

The universality of the laws of physics is an accepted mainstream part of science.

Bingo. That is their death.

You're challenging that, so you need to provide evidence.

Not unless and untill they prove what laws existed.

 

[dad]

So that is why you're so opposed to science. Then I can calm you, that's not what science is about and satan is not its inspiration.

Prove it. If the shoe fits....

 

[dad]

Then, by using that computer, aren't you supporting Satan? RUN, DAD!!!!

No. I am attacking his lies if you notice. With vigor and relish.

 

[Tiberius]

Yes. You are using Satan's own tools to attack him. What a brilliant idea. I'm sure he's kicking himself right now, wondering how he never saw such tactics coming.

 

[florida2]

My claim is that science knows not what laws existed. That is evident.
Bingo. That is their death.
Not unless and untill they prove what laws existed.

Modern science is built upon the idea that the laws of physics are the same anywhere.

You are challenging that idea. Provide evidence.

 

[Elendur]

Prove it. If the shoe fits....

Stop using the term prove.

 

[dad]

Yes. You are using Satan's own tools to attack him. What a brilliant idea. I'm sure he's kicking himself right now, wondering how he never saw such tactics coming.

OK.

 

[dad]

Stop using the term prove.

Start using it.

 

[Elendur]

Start using it.

I'm using it, but in the correct context. I'm studying mathematics.