A predicate contingent on things, or a self-subsisting reality?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It could be that the former is a sub-set of the latter, or simply that the term "existence" has more that one meaning.A predicate contingent on things, or a self-subsisting reality?
A predicate contingent on things, or a self-subsisting reality?
The fact that we can form a noun from any verb seems to be a curse when it comes to philosphy.A predicate contingent on things, or a self-subsisting reality?
I don't think that I would consider existence a property. Rather, it is a way of noting that there are properties present. Existence isn't an additional property.
eudaimonia,
Mark
If something that doesn't exist in the physical world can be hypothesized, does it exist in some form?
No.
My point is that "existence" isn't a property on top of other properties, but simply the recognition that there is something there, something that has properties.
eudaimonia,
Mark
Is "hypothetical" or "conceptual" not a property?
Does existence exist?
So existence contains itself?If existence means "the sum of all existents and their relations", then yes. Existing things exist, and they exist in relation to each other.
So existence contains itself?