- Aug 3, 2012
- 29,555
- 29,264
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
I typically vote Dem, but I'm a technocrat at heart. As such, I'm much more interested in solutions than I am in any sort of partisan orthodoxy. Because of my media consumption, I'm exposed to (and am, thus, more familiar with the pro's and cons of) more center-left policy ideas than I am center-right and beyond.
I'm curious: What conservative policies implemented within the last, say, 20-25 years, have had the effects they were predicted to or claimed to have had? Heck, we can even include happy accidents - successes that weren't necessarily predicted, but turned out good anyways. I'm not looking for vague claims like "unemployment fell under Trump" or "Texas has great job growth." I'm looking for examples that are specific and measurable. A center-left example of what I'm looking for would be that Obamacare reduced the number of people without health insurance and slowed the growth of total health care expenditures. An example from the right would be that Trump's tax cuts increased GDP growth.
Citations would be preferred. Op-eds are not preferred as a source unless they happen to provide a lot of citations themselves (as Paul Krugman tends to do, for example).
I'm curious: What conservative policies implemented within the last, say, 20-25 years, have had the effects they were predicted to or claimed to have had? Heck, we can even include happy accidents - successes that weren't necessarily predicted, but turned out good anyways. I'm not looking for vague claims like "unemployment fell under Trump" or "Texas has great job growth." I'm looking for examples that are specific and measurable. A center-left example of what I'm looking for would be that Obamacare reduced the number of people without health insurance and slowed the growth of total health care expenditures. An example from the right would be that Trump's tax cuts increased GDP growth.
Citations would be preferred. Op-eds are not preferred as a source unless they happen to provide a lot of citations themselves (as Paul Krugman tends to do, for example).