• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Evolution's Brick Wall

Status
Not open for further replies.

pitabread

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2017
12,920
13,373
Frozen North
✟351,833.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
I’m not sure you got my inference with the video... that things can have a ‘somewhat’ similar design, and yet not be the same.

Like different species of ammonites? Why believe they evolved? Why not believe they were individually created?
 
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
10,037
3,434
Hartford, Connecticut
✟403,810.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I’m not sure you got my inference with the video... that things can have a ‘somewhat’ similar design, and yet not be the same. And a fictional character as an example shouldn’t be too foreign to conjecture. The bottom line is nothing else acts like a human, nothing else reasons like a human, and despite all that, it's ironic that only a human (or some anyway) would ever consider themselves as having been ‘something else’ at one time.

Well, i mean, its a movie. Realistically, a true alien from outer space, if it existed, most likely wouldnt look like the predator. The predator was made human like because its the only way a human could fit in the predator costume. Realistically, the only reason the predator looks human like is because we imagined it to be human like. And this is the case in a lot of cartoons and movies. Like the marvel movies, a lot of the aliens look just like people with makeup on (in fact they are). Its just the way we imagine and create them. But theres really no telling what a true alien would look like. It most likely wouldnt be bipedal with two eyes, 5 fingers and toes with glasses and a bad back. Because this form is something unique to our lineage. Not even other animals on the same planet look remotely close to us, aside from our direct relatives.

The fact that we are able to reason and think and understand complex systems, is precisely the reason that we are able to consider that we were at one time, something else. No other living species on earth has the mental capacity to understand our origins like we do. Its a gift.
 
Upvote 0

pitabread

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2017
12,920
13,373
Frozen North
✟351,833.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Arnold probably developed muscles he didn't have before for the movie, but he was still human... micro.

Not sure what the Arnold reference has to do with the price of tea in China, I'll just cut to the chase:

In a round about way you appear to be trying to assert that there are biological limits in nature to evolutionary change. If you want to assert that, then I repeat the question I asked you earlier in the thread: what are those biological limits? What defines them? How can such limits can be tested?

Because I don't know what those limits are.
 
Upvote 0

inquiring mind

and a discerning heart
Site Supporter
Dec 31, 2016
7,221
3,311
U.S.
✟720,194.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Not sure what the Arnold reference has to do with the price of tea in China, I'll just cut to the chase:

In a round about way you appear to be trying to assert that there are biological limits in nature to evolutionary change. If you want to assert that, then I repeat the question I asked you earlier in the thread: what are those biological limits? What defines them? How can such limits can be tested?

Because I don't know what that is.

The only biological limit to evolution that I have asserted is a 'brick wall.' It's been tested every time hopeful proof of a 'big change' busts its nose on it.
 
Upvote 0

pitabread

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2017
12,920
13,373
Frozen North
✟351,833.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
The only biological limit to evolution that I have asserted is a 'brick wall.' It's been tested every time hopeful proof of a 'big change' busts its nose on it.

No idea what you mean by a "big change". You're not invoking the strawman money-giving-birth-a-human version of evolution are you? :scratch:

But what you're really telling me is that you can't point to any biological barriers in nature insofar as evolutionary change goes.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

inquiring mind

and a discerning heart
Site Supporter
Dec 31, 2016
7,221
3,311
U.S.
✟720,194.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
No idea what you mean by a "hopeful change". :scratch:

The only biological limit to evolution that I have asserted is a 'brick wall.' It's been tested every time evolution's attempted march to mankind busts its nose on it. Is that any clearer for you?
 
Upvote 0

pitabread

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2017
12,920
13,373
Frozen North
✟351,833.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
The only biological limit to evolution that I have asserted is a 'brick wall.' It's been tested every time evolution's attempted march to mankind busts its nose on it. Is that any clearer for you?

"Brick wall" is an analogy. I have no idea what that means with respect to actual biology. I'm asking you to explain what the biological limits are with respect to biology (i.e. living organisms). In other words, what is the mechanism that is supposed to be limiting evolutionary change?

If all you have are analogies or vague references to sci-fi movies, then I have my answer already.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0

inquiring mind

and a discerning heart
Site Supporter
Dec 31, 2016
7,221
3,311
U.S.
✟720,194.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
"Brick wall" is an analogy. I have no idea what that means with respect to actual biology. I'm asking you to explain what the biological limits are with respect to biology (i.e. living organisms).

If all you have are analogies or vague references to sci-fi movies, then I have my answer already.

Well... goodbye.
 
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
10,037
3,434
Hartford, Connecticut
✟403,810.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Precisely. ^.

Recent research suggests that speciation in nature, for most species occurs within 100-200 thousand years.

And with that, peoe will be people, and will not clearly evolve into something else in our life time. But this is not to say that it hasn't happened nor does it mean that speciation will not continue to happen in mankind or life around the globe. Indeed we have observed speciation occurring. There is no reason to believe that it (mutations, morphological change) would ever stop. Nor any reason to believe that it is a recent phenomenon that hasn't happened in the past (we have a fossil record).

It is what it is. And the sooner people accept this reality, the sooner we can move forward out of the stone age in our understanding of science and technology.

And for many, including myself, this has been a hard pill to swallow when first introduced to it. But, denial certainly isn't a better alternative.
 
Upvote 0

Colter

Member
Nov 9, 2004
8,711
1,408
62
✟107,811.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
The ministry of the mind spirits plays a role in the evolution of life.


65:6.2 "There is original endowment of adaptation in living things and beings. In every living plant or animal cell, in every living organism—material or spiritual—there is an insatiable craving for the attainment of ever-increasing perfection of environmental adjustment, organismal adaptation, and augmented life realization. These interminable efforts of all living things evidence the existence within them of an innate striving for perfection."

65:6.7 "The lower forms of plant life are wholly responsive to physical, chemical, and electrical environment. But as the scale of life ascends, one by one the mind ministries of the seven adjutant spirits become operative, and the mind becomes increasingly adjustive, creative, co-ordinative, and dominative. The ability of animals to adapt themselves to air, water, and land is not a supernatural endowment, but it is a superphysical adjustment."
 
Upvote 0

Colter

Member
Nov 9, 2004
8,711
1,408
62
✟107,811.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Do you talk to plants?
No, plants can’t talk. Although I must be honest, when I was a pot head I use to grow weed, I was kind of infatuated with the plant. Now I see it for what it is, just a plant.

Btw, in Gen. when God formed Adam from the dust, was God talking to dust?
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,737
10,571
✟323,677.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
You mention so many creatures - but you supply zero set sequence between any two different creatures showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another lifeform over time.

Is that clear? You and other evolutionists are void of proof that evolution has occurred.

And do not face up to your dilemma, and seem to pretend your not standing on conjecture.
Any casual reader who is inclined to believe this deluded nonsense should take the time to make a diligent study of the evidence. If you are so inclined please feel free to contact me by pm and I shall be happy to recommend, based on your educational background, books, articles or other materials that would allow you to make an informed decision.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,857,858
52,890
Guam
✟5,242,735.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Any casual reader who is inclined to believe this deluded nonsense should take the time to make a diligent study of the evidence. If you are so inclined please feel free to contact me by pm and I shall be happy to recommend, based on your educational background, books, articles or other materials that would allow you to make an informed decision.
Microevolution (reproducing after its own kind) is mentioned in Genesis 1.

Macroevolution (reproducing into another kind) is not.

* kind = genus
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,737
10,571
✟323,677.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Microevolution (reproducing after its own kind) is mentioned in Genesis 1.

Macroevolution (reproducing into another kind) is not.

* kind = genus
My post was not directed at those who wish to sully their faith with reprehensible, fatuous attempts to distort science in support of their views. It was directed at those with sincere doubts in either direction who wish objective guidance. Please feel free to place me on Ignore. You'll suffer less disturbance that way.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,857,858
52,890
Guam
✟5,242,735.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
My post was not directed at those who wish to sully their faith with reprehensible, fatuous attempts to distort science in support of their views.
Science can take a hike.
Ophiolite said:
It was directed at those with sincere doubts in either direction who wish objective guidance.
Good.

2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
Ophiolite said:
Please feel free to place me on Ignore. You'll suffer less disturbance that way.
I don't have anyone on IGNORE. I did years ago, but my curiosity kept prompting me to read what they wrote.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.