Evolution's Brick Wall

[Paul of Eugene OR]

Evolution plays connect-the-dots.

Creationists play erase the connections.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

Be good soil. Let God's word reside and grow within your heart. Let others take on these void of the Spirit evolutionists who push God's faithful around.

We should accept every word from God, including the natural world that is here because He spoke it into existence, and not deny the Word of God seen in His rocks, His genomes, His stars.

 

[Ophiolite]

Fall in line to what is requsted to be presented.

Show the detailed morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another lifeform over time.

This includes a sequence of your favorite ammonite - show someting that evolved from ammonites - show us all how an ammonite started to morphologically change into another lifeform. You know, what evolution says has happened to all creatures we see on earth.

Why do you not show any sequence of fossils between lifeforms that shows by detailed evolution from one lifeform into another lifeform over time in the fossil record to show evolution happened?

Step in line to the post requests - and show the major obvious evidence that should exist to prove evolution by clear observation.

Is this clear? Fossil evidence between any two lifeforms that shows by detailed evolution occurred.

Why do you not supply the obvious for proving evolution? Is it because the fossils between lifeforms do not exist? Is that the reason?

Is it because the missing fossils show evolution never occurred?

Are you saying that the fossils do not exist and godless Earth scientists are playing connect the dots by use of conjecture in place of scientific evidence?

Finally you reply. No apology for ignoring half a dozen requests. Insted a pathetic attempt at avoidance.

Ammonites are an Order. Primates are an Order. Progressive development of ammonites throughout the Mezozoic are an example of the morphological sequence you are seeking. One ammonite evolving into another kind of ammonite is no different from an early primate evolving into an ape, such as a human.

You want a morphological sequence. Go seek out The Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology volume concerned with Ammonites in your nearest university geology department. Then come back and continue with your fatuous denials.

I am not going to present the details here, because I do not have the time to type out hundreds of pages and dozens of illustrations, apart from the copyright issues. The information is there. Be stubborn, be intransigent, be selective in your vision. Ignore the data. But know in your heart of hearts, even when you ignore it, the evidence is still there, and the evidence is conclusive.

Thank you again for finally responding, even if you couldn't be bothered replying to my question. I'm now done with your nonsense.

A lot of chit chat talk that looks like you want to be an Elite in godless evolution knowledge.

Elite over the less informed or educated.

It is evident that I am much better informed and better educated than you, so in that sense I might be described as elite. However, I think it would be more accurate to describe me as average and you as deluded by choice. But that's just an opinion. My comments on evolution are factual.

Goodbye.

 

[NBB]

We should accept every word from God, including the natural world that is here because He spoke it into existence, and not deny the Word of God seen in His rocks, His genomes, His stars.

But the problem with evolution (not the theistic one) is that it pretends to be enough to grow life without the need for the creator.

 

[Heissonear]

Creationists play erase the connections.

Show the fossils inbetween two different creatures showing morphological changes of one lifeform changing into another lifeform over time.

You know, the proof of evolution you stand on. Or are the fossils missing and you stand on conjecture?

 

[Heissonear]

But the problem with evolution (not the theistic one) is that it pretends to be enough to grow life without the need for the creator.

It may be best to start a thread to present your topic points. This thread is about the fossil record, and fossils that are missing inbetween creatures.

 

[NBB]

It may be best to start a thread to present your topic points. This thread is about the fossil record, and fossils that are missing inbetween creatures.

Let me derail a bit a thread, it is not that bad.

 

[Heissonear]

Finally you reply. No apology for ignoring half a dozen requests. Insted a pathetic attempt at avoidance.

Ammonites are an Order. Primates are an Order. Progressive development of ammonites throughout the Mezozoic are an example of the morphological sequence you are seeking. One ammonite evolving into another kind of ammonite is no different from an early primate evolving into an ape, such as a human.

You want a morphological sequence. Go seek out The Treatise on Invertebrate Palaeontology volume concerned with Ammonites in your nearest university geology department. Then come back and continue with your fatuous denials.

I am not going to present the details here, because I do not have the time to type out hundreds of pages and dozens of illustrations, apart from the copyright issues. The information is there. Be stubborn, be intransigent, be selective in your vision. Ignore the data. But know in your heart of hearts, even when you ignore it, the evidence is still there, and the evidence is conclusive.

Thank you again for finally responding, even if you couldn't be bothered replying to my question. I'm now done with your nonsense.

It is evident that I am much better informed and better educated than you, so in that sense I might be described as elite. However, I think it would be more accurate to describe me as average and you as deluded by choice. But that's just an opinion. My comments on evolution are factual.

Goodbye.

Goodbye.

I do not need a treatise showing the radiation of dogs - I mean ammonites - life forms, and how they vary.

You still have not provided detailed fossils inbetween even one set of different lifeforms on Earth that show evolution happened.

Your goodbye is your failure to support evolution by evidence within the past.

And the goodbye is in recognition that evolution has hit a wall, and all we see is conjecture scattered about. Words without proof. The very foundation of evolution is manmade, and but words of conjecture.

Godless Naturalists of the past have jumped the gun before obtaining the necessary evidence of proof evolution happened.

For fossils to be around for over 600 million years (yes, a very long period of time and extreme amount of sedimental depositional events to bury things) and at this point to have no (zero) detailed fossil evidence that proves evolution - well - the wall supporting evolution has been hit; and we can now know garbage conjecture has been presented as fact in Historical Geology books. Even public school Earth science books.

 

[Tinker Grey]

Creationists play erase the connections.

and the dots ... and then burn the paper.

 

[Heissonear]

Let me derail a bit a thread, it is not that bad.

The forum rules state to not derail but open a topic thread dealing with the other matter.

 

[Tinker Grey]

We should accept every word from God, including the natural world that is here because He spoke it into existence, and not deny the Word of God seen in His rocks, His genomes, His stars.

When I was a believer, this was my line. Nature is God's word direct to your 'ear'; scripture is second-hand knowledge.

 

[Heissonear]

and the dots ... and then burn the paper.

The best you and others can do!

Because there is zero morphologically detailed evidence showing evolution between different lifeforms.

Evolution has a foundation of sand - conjecture.

 

[Heissonear]

We should accept every word from God, including the natural world that is here because He spoke it into existence, and not deny the Word of God seen in His rocks, His genomes, His stars.

Thin ice that has given way below them is the predicament evolutionists now find themselves.

 

[Heissonear]

There is a reason there is not one fossil sequence inbetween any two different lifeforms that shows evolution has occurred on God's Earth.

And it is not evolutionists that have such understanding in the Last Days.

Many Christians have been shipwrecked and have unfaithfully followed the words of Godless Naturalists (mere words of men) rather than waiting on God to bear witness and waiting on true proof (not conjecture) evolution happened.

Bad soil is subject to the influence of men and their words.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

The best you and others can do!

Because there is zero morphologically detailed evidence showing evolution between different lifeforms.

Evolution has a foundation of sand - conjecture.

The above post denying morphologically detailed evidence showing evolution was written by a human with vestigial ear wiggling muscles which he probably cannot even activate (some of us can). Useless to us humans, they are mute witnesses of a past ancestral species that could move its ears to good effect.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

But the problem with evolution (not the theistic one) is that it pretends to be enough to grow life without the need for the creator.

Evolution is a description of life events . . . and the life events, themselves, don't make claims like that. Evolution is also a theory . . . and the theory does not speak to how life started, with or without a Creator. Only actual scientists, speaking not as scientists, can express opinions about Our Creator.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

There is a reason there is not one fossil sequence inbetween any two different lifeforms that shows evolution has occurred on God's Earth.

And it is not evolutionists that have such understanding in the Last Days.

Many Christians have been shipwrecked and have unfaithfully followed the words of Godless Naturalists (mere words of men) rather than waiting on God to bear witness and waiting on true proof (not conjecture) evolution happened.

Bad soil is subject to the influence of men and their words.

Every time a fossil bridging a gap between other species is found people like you merely assert it creates two more gaps. Many such fossils have been found, and many such denials have been uttered.

 

[NBB]

Evolution is a description of life events . . . and the life events, themselves, don't make claims like that. Evolution is also a theory . . . and the theory does not speak to how life started, with or without a Creator. Only actual scientists, speaking not as scientists, can express opinions about Our Creator.

We already discussed this to the death in the other thread lol, but why atheist love evolution? because it does not need God to function and grow life.

 

[Tinker Grey]

We already discussed this to the death in the other thread lol, but why atheist love evolution? because it does not need God to function and grow life.

Atheist's don't "love" evolution. They simply don't deny reality for the sake of some ideology.

 

[NBB]

Atheist's don't "love" evolution. They simply don't deny reality for the sake of some ideology.

For me is backwards, the reality is with God existing and atheism is the ideology.