http://emporium.turnpike.net/C/cs/top.htm
Here are some points from a FORMER evolutionist.
I like the look of your photo,,peace
http://emporium.turnpike.net/C/cs/top.htm
a bit worse than the average PRATT list
Evidence #1
There are no transitional links and intermediate forms in either the fossil record or the modern world. Therefore, there is no actual evidence that evolution has occurred either in the past or the present.
that is simply not true.
every fossil is a transitional, in the same way that you are a transitional between your folks and your kids. it is a form of Zeno's paradox.
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.html
Evidence #2
Natural selection (the supposed evolution mechanism, along with mutations) is incapable of advancing an organism to a "higher-order".
first, there is no such thing as a high order in the TofE, higher is a moral and ethical term and has no place in a scientific discussion.
RM-NS has been shown to do specific things like the nylon bug and antibiotics resistance. i don't personally know how to show a negative like "incapable" nor it's opposite showing how RM-NS is a sufficient explanation. nor do i think anyone really claims that RM-NS is sufficient in the face of a half a dozen other known mechanisms like sexual selection and genetic drift.
Evidence #3
Although evolutionists state that life resulted from non-life, matter resulted from nothing, and humans resulted from animals, each of these is an impossibility of science and the natural world.
this is abiogenesis not the TofE, the TofE says nothing about how the first replicator was devised, only what happens when a sufficiently robust replicator does exist.
Evidence #4
The supposed hominids (creatures in-between ape and human that evolutionists believe used to exist) bones and skull record used by evolutionists often consists of `finds' which are thoroughly unrevealing and inconsistent. They are neither clear nor conclusive even though evolutionists present them as if they were.
my interests aren't in this field, there are lots of good rebuttals to this however.
Evidence #5
Nine of the twelve popularly supposed hominids are actually extinct apes/ monkeys and not part human at all.
same as above, my interests in biology are in molecular and genetics.
Evidence #6
The final three supposed hominids put forth by evolutionists are actually modern human beings and not part monkey/ ape at all. Therefore, all twelve of the supposed hominids can be explained as being either fully monkey/ ape or fully modern human but not as something in between.
this is simply a lie.
Evidence #7
Natural selection can be seen to have insurmountable social and practical inconsistencies.
science has no social or practical consistencies. metaphysics and philosophy do. what social darwinism does with the science is nothing to do with the truthfulness of the science.
Evidence #8
Natural selection has severe logical inconsistencies.
what, exactly?
Evidence #9
The rock strata finds (layers of buried fossils) are better explained by a universal flood than by evolution.
this is a bald faced lie.
Bias Towards Evolution
Evolutionists often have come forth and admitted their own and their colleagues' extreme degree of bias in this matter. Some have admitted that their approach has not been scientific or objective at all. Many admit to the severe lack of evidence for evolution and that they have accepted their conclusions only because they are unwilling to accept that evolution never occurred. (And other final considerations.)
more metaphysical bluster.
