• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Evolutionist Fraud

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes

TK2005

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2005
746
4
55
Henderson, KY
✟23,403.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
The use of forensic science (good science) to help the evolutionary idea is not helpful to the cause. It simply serves to prove my point. We base our observation in forensic science on events and results that are directly observable by man today. We have not even once witnessed one species changing into a completely new species. That's bad science and speculative.
 
Upvote 0
E

Elduran

Disruptive influence
May 19, 2005
1,773
64
43
✟24,830.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html

Observations of species becoming new species.
 
Upvote 0

Lord Emsworth

Je ne suis pas une de vos élèves.
Oct 10, 2004
51,745
421
Through the cables and the underground ...
✟76,459.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private



Pika, Pika!

 
Upvote 0

Pete Harcoff

PeteAce - In memory of WinAce
Jun 30, 2002
8,304
72
✟9,884.00
Faith
Other Religion

You've got it wrong. A good amount of evolutionary theory is based on current observation including the formation of new species (in both lab and nature settings).
 
Upvote 0
C

caravelair

Well-Known Member
Mar 22, 2004
2,107
77
46
✟25,119.00
Faith
Atheist

if a species ever turned into something completely different, it would disprove evolution, not prove it. evolution says that things only change by gradual modification of existing structures.
 
Upvote 0
D

Dannager

Back in Town
May 5, 2005
9,025
476
40
✟11,829.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Democrat
See Elduran's link for a series of refutations to your claim that we've never observed speciation. We have.
 
Upvote 0

Gracchus

Senior Veteran
Dec 21, 2002
7,199
821
California
Visit site
✟38,182.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
JohnR7 said:
With teachers like you it is no wonder I have not learned a thing.
Click to expand...

You are not equipped to learn, JohnR7, anymore than pigs are equipped to learn to play a piano sonata. We can't blame the teacher, the piano, or the pig.

 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
JohnR7 said:
The theory of embryonic recapitulation asserts that the human fetus goes through various stages of its evolutionary history as it develops.
Click to expand...


Actually, "Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" is more specific than that. It states that embryonic development will go in the same order ans evolutionary development. It was later discovered that the orders do not match up, and some stages are missing altogether.

While ontogeny (embryonic development) does not recapitulate phylogeny (evolutionary development), it does reflect phylogeny. For instance, dolphins actually develop leg buds, reflecting their terrestrial heritage. Humans develop brachial arches which reflects their common ancestory with all other vertebrates.

While the pics were misrepresentative, it is important to note that it was evolutionists that uncovered the fraud. This is in stark contrast to the current situation where creationists such as those in the RATE group continue to propogate bad science and fraud which is repeated by creationists over and over.
 
Upvote 0
J

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Gracchus said:
anymore than pigs are equipped to learn to play a piano sonata.
Click to expand...

Or anymore then a pigs tooth is the "missing link". If all evols have to learn is nonsense like that, then what is there to learn? Here are a few links that talk about more fraud that is peddled in the name of evolution.
 
Upvote 0

Asimov

Objectivist
Sep 9, 2003
6,014
258
41
White Rock
✟7,455.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
CA-Others
JohnR7 said:
Or anymore then a pigs tooth is the "missing link". If all evols have to learn is nonsense like that, then what is there to learn? Here are a few links that talk about more fraud that is peddled in the name of evolution.
Click to expand...

So, another compulsively expressed lie and a bad cut and paste job.
 
Upvote 0

Pete Harcoff

PeteAce - In memory of WinAce
Jun 30, 2002
8,304
72
✟9,884.00
Faith
Other Religion
First of all, you've done a nice copy 'n paste, but I doubt you've read any of those links, John.

Second, the actual frauds in those links are the usual creationist suspects: Piltdown, Archaeorator, etc. And it should be noted that Archaeoraptor was a fraud perpetuated by a Chinese farmer in an attempt to increase the value of the fossil he found. It was NOT a fraud in an attempt to prove evolution.

The rest of those links seem to be a hodge-podge of the usual creationist suspects. And most of those aren't even frauds (peppered moths, horse series, Nebraska man...).

This proves how desperate creationists are that they keep re-cycling the same attemps at claims of forgery. Not to mention it also proves how reactionary creationists are. They have nothing original to bring to the table, so they keep trying to discredit everything else.
 
Upvote 0
J

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Loudmouth said:
[/font]

Actually, "Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" is more specific than that. It states that embryonic development will go in the same order ans evolutionary development.
Click to expand...

The point is that what evos teach changes from day to day, week to week, month to month and year to year. They have even gone beyond neodarwinism in a vain attept to keep their theory believeable in light of the most recent discoverys. They keep grinding out theory and then science itself falsifys the theory so they just grind out a new theory that in time will be falsified.
 
Upvote 0

Asimov

Objectivist
Sep 9, 2003
6,014
258
41
White Rock
✟7,455.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
CA-Others

More unsupported claims. *yawn*
 
Upvote 0
J

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Pete Harcoff said:
And most of those aren't even frauds (peppered moths, horse series, Nebraska man...)
Click to expand...

Creationists know that evos are deceived. They know that evos buy into their own deception and are not able to admit their fraud. There is a lot of fraud. I quit trying to figure out the reason why there is so much fraud. But even if we do not know why evos do what they do, that still does not change the fraud and the deception.

Romans 1:22-23
Professing to be wise, they became fools, [23] and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man--and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Evolution conflict and division
Replies
79
Views
3K
Creation & Theistic Evolution
The Barbarian
Shameless instrumentalization of Cardinal Newman as progressive poster boy
Replies
2
Views
333
One Bread, One Body - Catholic
RileyG
Transfiguration Reimagined: A Flat Canvas That Reaches Heaven
Replies
0
Views
101
One Bread, One Body - Catholic
Michie
The music we make or listen to has serious moral and spiritual implications
Replies
1
Views
361
One Bread, One Body - Catholic
fide
What is your theory, belief around Foreknowledge?
Replies
6
Views
627
Salvation (Soteriology)
FutureAndAHope
Menu
Log in
Register