Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
in that case i don't see your meaning on how my statement is ironic. could you explain?Nathan Poe said:The rest of your comment is based on the false statement which I joked about. It's hardly my fault you chose to build your house on the sand...
butxifxnot said:in that case i don't see your meaning on how my statement is ironic. could you explain?
oh. my point was that evolutionists try to make creationists prove their side and vice versa, while we pay for instruction through an evolution light. we pay for evolution science, and have no more proof for evolution than creationism (i say this from evulution perspective)Arikay said:I think because creationist groups Are trying to push creationism into our public schools.
although not ironic, I think there are more things than just how evolution is taught that we aren't getting our tax moneys worth when it comes to public schools. But thats a different topic.
I disagree there must be a link between abiogenesis and evolution for abiogenesis gives birth to the very organisms affected by evolution.Jet Black said:where the world came from has nothing to do with evolution.
abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution.
. abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution.
there is nothing to see here. move along, move along.
butxifxnot said:oh. my point was that evolutionists try to make creationists prove their side and vice versa, while we pay for instruction through an evolution light. we pay for evolution science, and have no more proof for evolution than creationism (i say this from evulution perspective)
If kind = species, then consider creationism that entails that only "each creature brings forth after its own kind" proved false as the evolution of new species has been observed.butxifxnot said:"Each creature brings forth after its own kind. Thats no theory; thats a fact. Why then should we believe that man comes from another species? If evolution is true, then it is proof that the Bible is false. However, the whole of creation stands in contradiction to the theory of evolution. " -The Evidence Bible
this is about as simple as the argument can get.
Evolution simply accepts this fact. When you want to learn drive you don't first learn how the car is assembeled, or who the first car created, you simply accept these facts that they did happen.The Son of Him said:I disagree there must be a link between abiogenesis and evolution for abiogenesis gives birth to the very organisms affected by evolution.
Other wise you do not have a complete picture of life.
Your position is like saying the origin of the universe has nothing to do with the universe we see today.
I don't understand anything you're saying.orange said:Be well in truth...........Be well with truth......
Evolutionism it is not science, fool hypothesis about this-
If we would accept that God not created the world, then how the world could begin to had been? So it is simply imagination.
You can also imagine so, if you were not born from your mother, then how you can be created in 10 billion years from the mud by Evolution?
Scientists counted probability of life by Evolution; it is equal 0.0000000000000000000000 . and so on.
Certainly this argument also means nothing for Evolutionists as all other scientific facts.
How billion dollars was wasted to prove this fool evolution
From all nations. Devil simply steal from us these billions ..
MY (((((((((Scientists counted probability of life by Evolution; it is equal 0.0000000000000000000000 . and so on. )))))))))
Yours (((((((((((((So are the odds of 50 people winning a lottery in a particular order. Does that mean that lotteries are impossible? This argument doesn't work orange...and it really is a PRATT.)))))))))
Thank you for these words from you. From 1 minus 0.00000000000000000...===1
It is probability that God had Created the world.
Buy your lottery with 0.000000000.....probability. but I would buy lottery with 1* probability..........Here what is mean to be fooled!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Orange in Christ
orange said:Be well in truth...........Be well with truth......
Evolutionism it is not science, fool hypothesis about this-
If we would accept that God not created the world, then how the world could begin to had been? So it is simply imagination.
You can also imagine so, if you were not born from your mother, then how you can be created in 10 billion years from the mud by Evolution?
Scientists counted probability of life by Evolution; it is equal 0.0000000000000000000000 . and so on.
Certainly this argument also means nothing for Evolutionists as all other scientific facts.
How billion dollars was wasted to prove this fool evolution
From all nations. Devil simply steal from us these billions ..
MY (((((((((Scientists counted probability of life by Evolution; it is equal 0.0000000000000000000000 . and so on. )))))))))
Yours (((((((((((((So are the odds of 50 people winning a lottery in a particular order. Does that mean that lotteries are impossible? This argument doesn't work orange...and it really is a PRATT.)))))))))
Thank you for these words from you. From 1 minus 0.00000000000000000...===1
It is probability that God had Created the world.
Buy your lottery with 0.000000000.....probability. but I would buy lottery with 1* probability..........Here what is mean to be fooled!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Orange in Christ
The Son of Him said:I disagree there must be a link between abiogenesis and evolution for abiogenesis gives birth to the very organisms affected by evolution.
Other wise you do not have a complete picture of life.
Your position is like saying the origin of the universe has nothing to do with the universe we see today.
For your horible usage of smilies you'll get a $10 fine. Have a nice day, sir.kevkev said:There is intelligent life on this planet!!!
no, evolutionary theory is a biogenic theory i.e. it assumes that life already exists. Wen we tak about life we mean an "object" which has the ability to reproduce, metabolize, maintain a form of homeostasis and so on. abiogenesis does not involve these things. the earliest replicators for example could only reproduce (fire can only reproduce) and from these replicators we start to edge towards life. Fine one can describe much of thi searly process in the same words as evolution i.e. the replicators mutate and are naturally selected, but the thing that is replicatong and being selected is different. Evolutionary theory does not require this kind of chemical abiogenesis to happen, and would survive equally well with the discovery that "in the beginning God created a bacterium and then let it get on with things" whereas abiogenesis could not survive that onslaught. So from this we can see that abiogenesis is not evolution, because the latter can survive without the former.The Son of Him said:I disagree there must be a link between abiogenesis and evolution for abiogenesis gives birth to the very organisms affected by evolution.
Other wise you do not have a complete picture of life.
Your position is like saying the origin of the universe has nothing to do with the universe we see today.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?