Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Are you saying science isn't qualified to speak for (or against) God?If you were truly as concerned with intellectual honesty as you feign being, you would be angry with all science, not just biology.
Are you saying science isn't qualified to speak for (or against) God?
Because creationists insist that science speaks for the existence God. If you are going to get in the science game you have to ante up.If so, then why do scientific methodists ask for evidence of Him and His miracles?
This is strange to you?If so, then why do scientific methodists ask for evidence of Him and His miracles?
You mean no evidence you'll accept as evidence ... correct?Correct, because science is not qualified to speak for (or against) the existence of anything for which no evidence is available.
Actually, no.This is strange to you?
I think you may have skipped over step two.Actually, no.
The formula goes like this:
1. Request evidence.
2. Receive evidence.
3. Reject evidence.
4. Rinse and repeat.
This is what the empiricists did to Jesus from the time He first went public until His ascension into Heaven until today.
There is nothing new under the sun.
Evidence is evidence... it stands on it's own.You mean no evidence you'll accept as evidence ... correct?
Can you present evidence for creationism without requiring miracles or direct intervention by God?You mean working from naturalistic assumptions, which I am not limited to.
Creation was and is a miracle of the highest order, don't be ridiculous.Can you present evidence for creationism without requiring miracles or direct intervention by God?
It´s more like: "God" - as defined by the Abrahmic religions - isn´t qualified to be subject to scientific reasearch.Are you saying science isn't qualified to speak for (or against) God?
This only happens when someone requests science to deal with "God". Consequently they are reminded what´s required for something to become subject to scientific research. And evidence isn´t even the first criterium. It already starts with falisifiability of the hypothesis in question.If so, then why do scientific methodists ask for evidence of Him and His miracles?
So SEEKERS are what then?This only happens when someone requests science to deal with "God". Consequently they are reminded what´s required for something to become subject to scientific research. And evidence isn´t even the first criterium. It already starts with falisifiability of the hypothesis in question.
When your case is lost, you are trying to change the subject.So SEEKERS are what then?
No. Telling you that your God concept is - due to its definition - not subject to science.Seeking a god that can meet all the criteria of the scientific method?
No. Exactly my point.Do you think God is kidding when He says He is invisible?
Translation: You don't know what it is you are seeking?When your case is lost, you are trying to change the subject.
You ... you mean SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE!?quatona said:No. Telling you that your God concept is - due to its definition - not subject to science.
Then what's your point?quatona said:No. Exactly my point.
Inaccurate. What I personally seek wasn´t the topic. What science deals with was the topic.Translation: You don't know what it is you are seeking?
That´s probably becauseDon't feel bad.
In over ten years here, I've never seen a SEEKER answer that question.
No.And so far, you're no exception.You ... you mean SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE!?
I have expressed my point clearly several times. If you´d put more effort in trying to take it in rather than translating it into something else....Then what's your point?
So?I'm bragging when I say God is invisible;
Sounds aren´t transmitted on a message board. Where did you see me complaining, and about what? It´s more like you are complaining that science doesn´t deal with your God concept.it sounds like you're complaining though.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?