The fossil issue was settled on page one, with the video.
The other 11 pages are you claiming creationism FTW, without one shred of support for your claims.
That's because I'm well aware of the fossil evidence and have a very different perspective on this. If you think that the question of human origins and evolution has been definitively settled I say go in peace, I have no problem with you. If on the other hand you would be willing to hear a little honest skepticism that what I post here looking for. I've just been convinced over the years that the stone age tool wielding ape man is contrived. I must admit, at one time I was nearly convinced by the fossil record alone and was fully prepared to make some requisite changes to my theology. Comparative genomics changed all of that for me, since then I grown increasingly skeptical of the motives and bias in the scientific community regarding origins. Darwinism is riddled with fallacious reasoning, very often creationism is little better.
“It is disconcerting to realize that as their intellects were shaped and limited by the dogmas—often scientific—of their day, so may the intellect of the modern investigator be shaped by the a priori judgments of his time” (The Fossil Chronicles, Dean Falk)
That's a died in the wool Darwinian being skeptical of paleontologists. This Taung Child fossil has been called the most important hominid fossil ever unearthed, I tend to agree. Raymond Dart was the first person to suggest the term, 'Homo habilis' or the famous 'handy man' tool wielding ape. Louis Leakey cites him in Latest News From Oldovia Gorge in the early sixties in the same paper that rejected the cerebral rubicon as a basis for inclusion in human lineage, loosely described as hominid.
You want to talk fossils I'm fully prepared to do so, I've gleaned a ton of stuff over the years. It's been my experience that first you have to wade through the fallacious reasoning and posturing in order to get that far. So if your interested, lets talk fossils, I would thoroughly enjoy it. I just really don't think you would enjoy my critique of that video in the OP, I try to be reasonable but I'm a stickler for logical progression in an argument.
You want to get evidential, lets do it.
Grace and peace,
Mark
