The duckbill platypus has more genera on it than the Frankenstein monster.
I'm sure it's just a conglomeration of "species," isn't it?
QV: http://www.christianforums.com/t7790249-2/#post64583417
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The duckbill platypus has more genera on it than the Frankenstein monster.
I'm sure it's just a conglomeration of "species," isn't it?
Not clicking on any goofy links.
Ok, then refer to post #17 of this thread. That's what it links to.
The post links to an interactive chart of the tree of life. Find the platypus on there and you'll get your answer. It's not my problem if you refuse to learn.
The link in Post 17 is the one I'm referring to ...
Just out of curiosity, how many times has it been upgraded?
(Probably more times than the Periodic Table.)
Anymore attempts at "gotchya" questions or are you about finished being deliberately obtuse?
By "updated," I mean how much of Linnaeus' junk gets shuffled around the branches?
This is a Whatever unameit.
Oh, wait, it's now a Somet hingelsis.
Hold it! It's now a Movit elswear.
Intelligent design?How do creationists think we got from this:
To this:
Intelligent design?
Exactly, knowledge, experience and intelligence and the ability to think, the correction of mistakes and a wish to move forward and shine a light rather than stagnate and stay in the dark,Intelligent design?
I can't tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing with me here:Really? You think that the first plane was designed intelligently using the same knowledge base as was used to design the second? Or maybe that mere "Pluto-ing" (whatever that means) of that database improves our ability to design?
No, the database evolves as we add new discoveries, and as we tweak things that we did not understand as well as we thought we did.
It sounds to me like you're agreeing with me (minus the "junk," that is).By "updated," I mean how much of Linnaeus' junk gets shuffled around the branches?
This is a Whatever unameit.
Oh, wait, it's now a Somet hingelsis.
Hold it! It's now a Movit elswear.
So then how much of Linnaeus' ... um ... stuff gets shuffled around the branches like a woodpecker looking for a place to eat?Exactly, knowledge, experience and intelligence and the ability to think, the correction of mistakes and a wish to move forward and shine a light rather than stagnate and stay in the dark,
Aren't they sterile though?
What happened to saying they are incompatible because they fall into two different genera?
Are evolutionists implying that animals in two different genera can breed?
Exactly, knowledge, experience and intelligence and the ability to think, the correction of mistakes and a wish to move forward and shine a light rather than stagnate and stay in the dark,
what does religion want? fear, darkness and ignorance, the exact opposite.
I agree, the flooted pelgrin will only whisle on a Wednesday.So then how much of Linnaeus' ... um ... stuff gets shuffled around the branches like a woodpecker looking for a place to eat?
What is the offspring called? Leotig? Tigerpard?Asian leopards (genus Pantherine) can breed with tigers (genus Panther).
What is the offspring called?African leopards (genus Panther) can breed with North American cougars (genus Puma).
From the perspective of these "great cats," wouldn't the offspring look like a "crocoduck"?In fact, almost every Great Cat can breed with at least one Great Cat of a different genus.
No argument there.Creationism demands a static belief in a static dogma based on a static account of a creation story. Science is exactly the opposite!
Really? You think that the first plane was designed intelligently using the same knowledge base as was used to design the second? Or maybe that mere "Pluto-ing" (whatever that means) of that database improves our ability to design?
No, the database evolves as we add new discoveries, and as we tweak things that we did not understand as well as we thought we did.