• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Evolution vs. Creation: The Great Debate

KTatis

Well-Known Member
Mar 17, 2007
1,302
27
The Heavenly Abode
✟1,923.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I think I mistyped everything. What I was saying is Scientist spend all their hard work and money on collage to study the things around us but when it comes to christianity they claim that they know everything just by reading the Bible. True although I am a Christian I do believe in evolution.

P.S. Sorry for all the confusion but continue on. You guys had some very interesting points... even though they kind of targeted me. But all thats been cleared up now. : )
 
Upvote 0

TheBear

NON-WOKED
Jan 2, 2002
20,653
1,812
✟312,481.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Thank you for clarifying, KTatis.
 
Upvote 0

Baggins

Senior Veteran
Mar 8, 2006
4,789
474
At Sea
✟22,482.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
Even the title of this thread is off-beam.

There is no great debate between evolution and religious literalism in any non-theocratic state apart from the USA.

There is no great debate about evolution and biblical literalism in the USA amongst the educated ( scientifically literate )segment of the population.

And the educated segment of the population have little desire to debate such nonsense with those people who do wish to believe fairy tales.

Even most of those people who wish to push biblical literalism in the states do so for largely self serving reasons, they make money from it.

There is no real debate here at all. How can you debate reality versus the supernatural?
 
Upvote 0

cwalla5

Member
Apr 20, 2007
8
0
✟22,618.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Well, if you are talking about professors of evolution yes, they would have to go to school for years, but there are proponents of evolution who haven't even finished high school yet, and there who people who believe in evolution who study things like physics and astronomy.

Similarily there are people who study the creation, they are called creationists. Likewise there are people who believe in creation who haven't finished high school yet.

Maybe i'm confused, do you have to go to school for all that time to believe in evolution? No, someone can read you a story in science class and try to drill it into your head, no matter how illogical it seems to your innocent mind.

It takes more faith to believe in the "BIG BANG" and "EVOLUTION" than it is to believe that there is a creator. Do you realize how intricate of a process that is to have just happened by mistake? How many complicated life-changing events have occurred in your life by mistake?
 
Upvote 0

cwalla5

Member
Apr 20, 2007
8
0
✟22,618.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
How can someone say that evolution is any more real than creation?

Just like I haven't seen God and believe in Him, you haven't seen anything evolve lately, but you still believe. Oh, i guess your answer to that is wait another gazillion years and we'll see a flea turn into a tick.

I believe that the creatures created by God make physiological changes based on their environment, but it seems like Darwin took that concept and ran with it a little to far..
 
Upvote 0

Pete Harcoff

PeteAce - In memory of WinAce
Jun 30, 2002
8,304
72
✟9,884.00
Faith
Other Religion
cwalla5 said:
It takes more faith to believe in the "BIG BANG" and "EVOLUTION" than it is to believe that there is a creator.

Wherever I see someone make this glib statement (and that's all it really is), it suggests a huge lack of understanding of either of those theories.

Do you realize how intricate of a process that is to have just happened by mistake? How many complicated life-changing events have occurred in your life by mistake?

If things weren't the way they were, they'd be different. What you are suggesting is that everything is the way it is because of divine fiat. And you claim we are the ones with faith? Yeah, sure.
 
Upvote 0

Pete Harcoff

PeteAce - In memory of WinAce
Jun 30, 2002
8,304
72
✟9,884.00
Faith
Other Religion

Evolution, especially common descent, is backed by empirical evidence gained through over 150 years of scientific investigation. Genetics, in particular, plays a pretty significant role.

Not only that, but evolution, including common descent, is an applied science that has real-world usefulness (particularly in agriculture and medical research). To really appreciate all that, however, requires a decent understanding of the various aspects of the theory (and there are many), as well as your ear to the ground of the biotech industry.
 
Upvote 0

thecountrydoc

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2006
2,745
58
85
San Marcos, CA
✟70,664.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
OH ME, OH MY!!! What a discussion!

May I suggest to all who have posted here that there is one element that has been overlooked by all. That element is LOGIC. I say this with a fairly good understanding of both creation and evolution. I also say this with a fairly good understanding of human nature.

It should be noted that neither viewpoint can be proven by observation. Observation is a required component for a scientific study as defined in the world of academia by academic definition. Therefore I will not attempt to present my thoughts as a doctorial presentation. Rather, I will share somthing with you that I once shared with a young man who ask if creation was indeed done in seven litteral days who claimed to be a Christian. I must also tell you that for me personaly to accept any theory, or teaching, it must be logical.


Respectfully,
Doc

Lord put your arms around my sholders and your hand over my mouth.
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
How can someone say that evolution is any more real than creation?

Are you sure you're not conflating "Creation" with "Creationism?" You do understand there's a very big difference between the two right?

Just like I haven't seen God and believe in Him, you haven't seen anything evolve lately, but you still believe. Oh, i guess your answer to that is wait another gazillion years and we'll see a flea turn into a tick.

Now it seems like you're confusing evolution and atheism. You do understand there's a difference right? And no, we don't need to wait even a single minute longer to observe speciation since we already do in the fossil/molecular record and we have observed speciation in the wild and laboratory.

I believe that the creatures created by God make physiological changes based on their environment, but it seems like Darwin took that concept and ran with it a little to far..

How so, because that's the extent of what Darwin wrote about in Origin of the Species and what the Modern Synthesis continues to claim to this day (with the exception of beings being created by God of course)?
 
Upvote 0

Paulos23

Never tell me the odds!
Mar 23, 2005
8,462
4,824
Washington State
✟375,473.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
This is still just a statement of faith based off the belief that the bible is infallible. There is nothing logical about it.

And observation of an event is not a requirement of science, evidence is. Observation of an event can help and is preferred, but evidence the event left behind is required as well. If this wasn't the case the folks of CSI would be out of a job.
 
Upvote 0

thecountrydoc

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2006
2,745
58
85
San Marcos, CA
✟70,664.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Well Paulos23,

I find your response most interesting. Why do I say that? Because you have used the introduction to my last post while avoiding the body of the post. Your action reminds me of many so-called christians who pick and choose what they want from the Bible while ignoring the complete text. It would seem that your response is as illogicial as your theory.

To declare something to be scientific the following definition isused: The ability to demonstrate and observe an action or reaction, then by reproduction of said action or reaction observe the same results.

Respectfully,
Doc
 
Upvote 0

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
79
Visit site
✟30,931.00
Faith
Unitarian
This is wrong. Organisms around deep sea vents are independant of solar energy. The food source at the base of the food chain is bacteria that utlize H2S from the vents.
This was a fairly fundamental discovery, because this was the first very well defined ecosystem, and very elaborate ecosystem, that was completely independent of sunlight at any level of the food chain.
 
Upvote 0

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
79
Visit site
✟30,931.00
Faith
Unitarian
I don't think we all know that but some people do think that may be the case. I am not so sure.
 
Upvote 0

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
79
Visit site
✟30,931.00
Faith
Unitarian

How is the creation of plant life the day before the sun is created in any way LOGICAL?

Do you think the first plants thrived on starlight?
 
Upvote 0

thaumaturgy

Well-Known Member
Nov 17, 2006
7,541
882
✟12,333.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
It should be noted that neither viewpoint can be proven by observation. Observation is a required component for a scientific study as defined in the world of academia by academic definition.


Doc,
Might I ask if you have ever heard of "forensics"? Certainly you have seen television shows that discuss "crime investigations"?

While you are technically correct, neither evo nor creation can be proven 100.0...0% what we can do is develop a MODEL based on the available evidence.

Said model has as its inputs those things we see happening today and recorded in the "soft sediments" today and then look for that data in the ROCK RECORD. Which we find. We find exact replicas of dunes, ripple marks, raindrop impressions preserved in the rock record.

When it comes to evolution what we DO see are numerous lifeform changing over time reflected in the rock record. We see some animals that are NEVER found in earlier rocks and some NEVER found in later rocks.

The model that is developed is FAR superior to a "supernatural" model predicated on an imaginary being. While one may firmly believe in God they are incapable of presenting evidence of their particular conception of God that will significantly carry weight for all objective observers. Otherwise we'd all be one religion, right?

Face it, the creation hypothesis rests INITIALLY on the presence of God. It goes forward to draw out conclusions on God's nature based on verses from the Bible. However this cannot prove:

1. God exists
2. Who wrote Genesis
3. That Genesis is in any way a reliable source for information.

And further, there is no evidence anywhere in the rock record of the Genesis account of creation, nor is there evidence for other massive geologic events recorded in Genesis such as the Noachian flood.

You are perfectly free to hypothesize all you want. And you are correct that without "observation" we do have an unknowable past. But what people often FAIL to understand is that science can and does extrapolate graphs and extrapolate data and build workable, testable models predicated on literally mountains of evidence, both present and past.

Otherwise you are lost in the extremes of Hume's Empiricism. The falling-off point at which no claim can ever be verified until observed.
 
Upvote 0